Häuser W, Bernardy K, Wang H, Kopp I
Innere Medizin 1, Klinikum Saarbrücken gGmbH, Winterberg 1, 66119, Saarbrücken, Deutschland.
Schmerz. 2012 Jun;26(3):232-46. doi: 10.1007/s00482-012-1189-6.
The scheduled update to the German S3 guidelines on fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) by the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies ("Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften", AWMF; registration number 041/004) was planned starting in March 2011.
The development of the guidelines was coordinated by the German Interdisciplinary Association for Pain Therapy ("Deutsche Interdisziplinären Vereinigung für Schmerztherapie", DIVS), 9 scientific medical societies and 2 patient self-help organizations. Eight working groups with a total of 50 members were evenly balanced in terms of gender, medical field, potential conflicts of interest and hierarchical position in the medical and scientific fields. Literature searches were performed using the Medline, PsycInfo, Scopus and Cochrane Library databases (until December 2010). The grading of the strength of the evidence followed the scheme of the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. The formulation and grading of recommendations was accomplished using a multi-step, formal consensus process. Efficacy, risks, patient preferences and applicability of therapies available were summarized into a balance sheet. The guidelines were reviewed by the boards of the participating scientific medical societies.
The guidelines were published in several forms: complete and short scientific versions, clinical practice and patient versions. The English full-text version of this article is available at SpringerLink (under "Supplemental").
德国科学医学协会联合会(“Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften”,AWMF;注册号041/004)计划于2011年3月开始对德国关于纤维肌痛综合征(FMS)的S3指南进行定期更新。
该指南的制定由德国疼痛治疗跨学科协会(“Deutsche Interdisziplinären Vereinigung für Schmerztherapie”,DIVS)、9个科学医学协会和2个患者自助组织协调。8个工作组共有50名成员,在性别、医学领域、潜在利益冲突以及医学和科学领域的层级地位方面实现了均衡。使用Medline、PsycInfo、Scopus和Cochrane图书馆数据库(截至2010年12月)进行文献检索。证据强度分级遵循牛津循证医学中心的方案。推荐意见的制定和分级通过多步骤的正式共识过程完成。将现有疗法的疗效、风险、患者偏好和适用性汇总成一份资产负债表。这些指南由参与的科学医学协会的董事会进行审查。
这些指南以多种形式发布:完整和简短的科学版本、临床实践版本和患者版本。本文的英文全文版本可在SpringerLink上获取(在“补充材料”下)。