Fattouch Khalil, Murana Giacomo, Castrovinci Sebastiano, Nasso Giuseppe, Mossuto Claudia, Corrado Egle, Ruvolo Giovanni, Speziale Giuseppe
Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2012 Oct;15(4):644-50. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivs195. Epub 2012 Jul 3.
The aim of this study was to assess the impact of aortic valve morphology and different surgical aortic valve repair techniques on long-term clinical outcomes.
Between February 2003 and May 2010, 216 patients with aortic insufficiency underwent aortic valve repair in our institution. Ages ranged between 26 and 82 years (mean 53 ± 15 years). Aortic valve dysfunctions, according to functional classification, were: type I in 55 patients (25.5%), type II in 126 (58.3%) and type III in 35 (16.2%). Sixty-six patients (27.7%) had a bicuspid valve. Aortic valve repair techniques included sub-commissural plasty in 138 patients, plication in 84, free-edge reinforcement in 80, resection of raphe plus re-suturing in 40 and the chordae technique in 52. Concomitant surgical procedures were CABG in 22 (10%) patients, mitral valve repair in 12 (5.5%), aortic valve-sparing re-implantation in 78 (36%) and ascending aorta replacement in 69 (32%). Mean follow-up was 42 ± 16 months and was 100% complete.
There were six early deaths (2.7%). Overall late survival was 91.5% (18 late deaths). There were 15 (6.9%) late cardiac-related deaths. NYHA functional class was ≤ II in all patients. At follow-up, 28 (14.5%) patients had recurrent aortic insufficiency ≥ grade II. The freedom from valve-related events was significantly different between bicuspid and tricuspid valve implantation (P < 0.01), between type I + II and type III (P < 0.001) dysfunction and between the chordae technique and plication, compared to free-edge reinforcement (P < 0.01). Statistically-significant differences were found between patients who underwent aortic valve repair plus root re-implantation, compared to those who underwent isolated aortic valve repair (P = 0.02).
Aortic valve repair including aortic annulus stabilization is a safe surgical option with either tricuspid or bicuspid valves; even more so if associated with root re-implantation. Patients with calcified bicuspid valves have poor results.
本研究旨在评估主动脉瓣形态及不同的外科主动脉瓣修复技术对长期临床结局的影响。
2003年2月至2010年5月期间,我院对216例主动脉瓣关闭不全患者实施了主动脉瓣修复术。患者年龄在26至82岁之间(平均53±15岁)。根据功能分类,主动脉瓣功能障碍情况为:I型55例(25.5%),II型126例(58.3%),III型35例(16.2%)。66例(27.7%)患者为二叶式主动脉瓣。主动脉瓣修复技术包括138例患者采用瓣下交界成形术,84例采用折叠术,80例采用游离缘加固术,40例采用嵴切除加重新缝合术,52例采用腱索技术。同期手术包括22例(10%)患者行冠状动脉旁路移植术,12例(5.5%)行二尖瓣修复术,78例(36%)行保留主动脉瓣的主动脉根部再植入术,69例(32%)行升主动脉置换术。平均随访时间为42±16个月,随访完整率达100%。
早期死亡6例(2.7%)。总体晚期生存率为91.5%(18例晚期死亡)。晚期心脏相关死亡15例(6.9%)。所有患者纽约心脏协会(NYHA)心功能分级均≤II级。随访时,28例(14.5%)患者出现≥II级的复发性主动脉瓣关闭不全。二叶式主动脉瓣与三叶式主动脉瓣植入、I + II型与III型功能障碍以及腱索技术与折叠术(与游离缘加固术相比)之间,瓣膜相关事件的无事件生存率存在显著差异(P < 0.01)。接受主动脉瓣修复加根部再植入术的患者与接受单纯主动脉瓣修复术的患者之间存在统计学显著差异(P = 0.02)。
包括主动脉瓣环稳定术的主动脉瓣修复术对于三叶式或二叶式主动脉瓣而言是一种安全的手术选择;若与根部再植入术联合应用则更是如此。钙化二叶式主动脉瓣患者预后较差。