Roetker Nicholas S, Yonker James A, Lee Chee, Chang Vicky, Basson Jacob J, Roan Carol L, Hauser Taissa S, Hauser Robert M, Atwood Craig S
Department of Sociology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
BMJ Open. 2012 Jul 2;2(4). doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-000944. Print 2012.
Single genetic loci offer little predictive power for the identification of depression. This study examined whether an analysis of gene-gene (G × G) interactions of 78 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in genes associated with depression and age-related diseases would identify significant interactions with increased predictive power for depression.
A retrospective cohort study.
A survey of participants in the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study.
A total of 4811 persons (2464 women and 2347 men) who provided saliva for genotyping; the group comes from a randomly selected sample of Wisconsin high school graduates from the class of 1957 as well as a randomly selected sibling, almost all of whom are non-Hispanic white.
Depression as determine by the Composite International Diagnostic Interview-Short-Form.
Using a classification tree approach (recursive partitioning (RP)), the authors identified a number of candidate G × G interactions associated with depression. The primary SNP splits revealed by RP (ANKK1 rs1800497 (also known as DRD2 Taq1A) in men and DRD2 rs224592 in women) were found to be significant as single factors by logistic regression (LR) after controlling for multiple testing (p=0.001 for both). Without considering interaction effects, only one of the five subsequent RP splits reached nominal significance in LR (FTO rs1421085 in women, p=0.008). However, after controlling for G × G interactions by running LR on RP-specific subsets, every split became significant and grew larger in magnitude (OR (before) → (after): men: GNRH1 novel SNP: (1.43 → 1.57); women: APOC3 rs2854116: (1.28 → 1.55), ACVR2B rs3749386: (1.11 → 2.17), FTO rs1421085: (1.32 → 1.65), IL6 rs1800795: (1.12 → 1.85)).
The results suggest that examining G × G interactions improves the identification of genetic associations predictive of depression. 4 of the SNPs identified in these interactions were located in two pathways well known to impact depression: neurotransmitter (ANKK1 and DRD2) and neuroendocrine (GNRH1 and ACVR2B) signalling. This study demonstrates the utility of RP analysis as an efficient and powerful exploratory analysis technique for uncovering genetic and molecular pathway interactions associated with disease aetiology.
单个基因位点对抑郁症的识别几乎没有预测能力。本研究探讨了对与抑郁症和年龄相关疾病相关的基因中的78个单核苷酸多态性(SNP)进行基因-基因(G×G)相互作用分析,是否能识别出与抑郁症预测能力增强相关的显著相互作用。
一项回顾性队列研究。
对威斯康星纵向研究的参与者进行的一项调查。
共有4811人(2464名女性和2347名男性)提供唾液用于基因分型;该组来自1957届威斯康星高中毕业生的随机抽样样本以及随机选择的兄弟姐妹,几乎所有人都是非西班牙裔白人。
通过综合国际诊断访谈简表确定的抑郁症。
使用分类树方法(递归划分(RP)),作者识别出了一些与抑郁症相关的候选G×G相互作用。在控制多重检验后,通过逻辑回归(LR)发现RP揭示的主要SNP分裂(男性中的ANKK1 rs1800497(也称为DRD2 Taq1A)和女性中的DRD2 rs224592)作为单一因素具有显著性(两者p = 0.001)。在不考虑相互作用效应的情况下,后续五个RP分裂中只有一个在LR中达到名义显著性(女性中的FTO rs1421085,p = 0.008)。然而,在通过对RP特定子集运行LR来控制G×G相互作用后,每个分裂都变得显著且效应大小增加(OR(之前)→(之后):男性:GNRH1新SNP:(1.43→1.57);女性:APOC3 rs2854116:(1.28→1.55),ACVR2B rs3749386:(1.11→2.17),FTO rs1421085:(1.32→1.65),IL6 rs1800795:(1.12→1.85))。
结果表明,检查G×G相互作用可改善对抑郁症预测性基因关联的识别。在这些相互作用中鉴定出的4个SNP位于两条众所周知会影响抑郁症的途径中:神经递质(ANKK1和DRD2)和神经内分泌(GNRH1和ACVR2B)信号传导。本研究证明了RP分析作为一种有效且强大的探索性分析技术,用于揭示与疾病病因相关的基因和分子途径相互作用的实用性。