• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

资产分配过程中公平考量的大脑活动:初始所有权是否起作用?

Brain activity in fairness consideration during asset distribution: does the initial ownership play a role?

机构信息

Key Laboratory of Child Development and Learning Science, Ministry of Education, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e39627. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039627. Epub 2012 Jun 26.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0039627
PMID:22761850
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3383671/
Abstract

Previous behavioral studies have shown that initial ownership influences individuals' fairness consideration and other-regarding behavior. However, it is not entirely clear whether initial ownership influences the brain activity when a recipient evaluates the fairness of asset distribution. In this study, we randomly assigned the bargaining property (monetary reward) to either the allocator or the recipient in the ultimatum game and let participants of the study, acting as recipients, receive either disadvantageous unequal, equal, or advantageous unequal offers from allocators while the event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded. Behavioral results showed that participants were more likely to reject disadvantageous unequal and equal offers when they initially owned the property as compared to when they did not. The two types of unequal offers evoked more negative going ERPs (the MFN) than the equal offers in an early time window and the differences were not modulated by the initial ownership. In a late time window, however, the P300 responses to division schemes were affected not only by the type of unequal offers but also by whom the property was initially assigned to. These findings suggest that while the MFN may function as a general mechanism that evaluates whether the offer is consistent or inconsistent with the equity rule, the P300 is sensitive to top-down controlled processes, into which factors related to the allocation of attentional resources, including initial ownership and personal interests, come to play.

摘要

先前的行为研究表明,初始所有权会影响个体的公平考虑和他人关注行为。然而,初始所有权是否会影响接受者评估资产分配公平性时的大脑活动,目前还不完全清楚。在这项研究中,我们在最后通牒博弈中随机将谈判财产(货币奖励)分配给分配者或接受者,让作为接受者的研究参与者从分配者那里收到不利的不平等、平等或有利的不平等的提议,同时记录事件相关电位(ERP)。行为结果表明,与他们没有初始所有权时相比,当他们最初拥有财产时,他们更有可能拒绝不利的不平等和平等的提议。与平等提议相比,两种不平等提议在早期时间窗口中引起了更负向的 ERP(MFN),而初始所有权并不能调节这种差异。然而,在晚期时间窗口中,对分配方案的 P300 反应不仅受到不平等提议类型的影响,还受到最初分配财产的人影响。这些发现表明,虽然 MFN 可能作为评估提议是否符合公平规则的一般机制起作用,但 P300 对自上而下的控制过程敏感,包括初始所有权和个人利益在内的与注意力资源分配相关的因素开始发挥作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a617/3383671/e8b75d625084/pone.0039627.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a617/3383671/bea6cc399265/pone.0039627.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a617/3383671/af70b1cbaf0a/pone.0039627.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a617/3383671/e8b75d625084/pone.0039627.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a617/3383671/bea6cc399265/pone.0039627.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a617/3383671/af70b1cbaf0a/pone.0039627.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a617/3383671/e8b75d625084/pone.0039627.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Brain activity in fairness consideration during asset distribution: does the initial ownership play a role?资产分配过程中公平考量的大脑活动:初始所有权是否起作用?
PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e39627. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039627. Epub 2012 Jun 26.
2
Social Comparison Affects Brain Responses to Fairness in Asset Division: An ERP Study with the Ultimatum Game.社会比较影响资产分割公平性的大脑反应:来自最后通牒博弈的 ERP 研究。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2011 Nov 9;5:131. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00131. eCollection 2011.
3
Ingroup/outgroup membership modulates fairness consideration: neural signatures from ERPs and EEG oscillations.群体/群体外成员身份调节公平性考虑:来自 ERP 和 EEG 振荡的神经特征。
Sci Rep. 2017 Jan 4;7:39827. doi: 10.1038/srep39827.
4
I am entitled to it! Social power and context modulate disadvantageous inequity aversion.我有权这样做!社会权力和背景会调节不利的不公平厌恶。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2022 Nov;181:150-159. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2022.09.004. Epub 2022 Sep 19.
5
Taking it easy when playing ultimatum game with a Down syndrome proposer: Effects on behavior and medial frontal negativity.与唐氏综合征提议者玩最后通牒游戏时要放轻松:对行为和中前额负性的影响。
Soc Neurosci. 2017 Oct;12(5):530-540. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2016.1195772. Epub 2016 Jun 13.
6
Medial frontal negativity reflects advantageous inequality aversion of proposers in the ultimatum game: An ERP study.内侧前额叶负波反映了最后通牒博弈中提议者对有利不平等的厌恶:一项ERP研究。
Brain Res. 2016 May 15;1639:38-46. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2016.02.040. Epub 2016 Feb 27.
7
Counterfactual comparison modulates fairness consideration in the mini-ultimatum game: an event-related potentials study.反事实比较调节了小额最后通牒博弈中的公平考量:一项事件相关电位研究。
Scand J Psychol. 2015 Apr;56(2):124-31. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12191. Epub 2015 Jan 13.
8
Social value orientation modulates fairness processing during social decision-making: evidence from behavior and brain potentials.社会价值取向调节社会决策中的公平处理:来自行为和脑电潜力的证据。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2021 Jul 6;16(7):670-682. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsab032.
9
Social distance modulates recipient's fairness consideration in the dictator game: an ERP study.社会距离调节独裁者游戏中被试的公平考虑:一项 ERP 研究。
Biol Psychol. 2011 Dec;88(2-3):253-62. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.08.009. Epub 2011 Sep 2.
10
The P300 and reward valence, magnitude, and expectancy in outcome evaluation.事件相关电位P300与结果评估中的奖励效价、大小及预期
Brain Res. 2009 Aug 25;1286:114-22. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.06.032. Epub 2009 Jun 17.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of social comparison on self-deception: An event-related potentials study.社会比较对自欺的影响:一项事件相关电位研究。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2024 Oct;24(5):931-947. doi: 10.3758/s13415-024-01203-x. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
2
Belief Updating during Social Interactions: Neural Dynamics and Causal Role of Dorsomedial Prefrontal Cortex.社会互动中的信念更新:背内侧前额叶皮质的神经动力学和因果作用。
J Neurosci. 2024 May 29;44(22):e1669232024. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1669-23.2024.
3
Which is More Important, Proposer Identity or Allocation Motive? Event-Related Potential in Economic Decision-Making.

本文引用的文献

1
Event-related brain potentials following incorrect feedback in a time-estimation task: evidence for a "generic" neural system for error detection.在时间估计任务中出现错误反馈后的事件相关脑电位:错误检测的“通用”神经系统证据。
J Cogn Neurosci. 1997 Nov;9(6):788-98. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1997.9.6.788.
2
Social Comparison Affects Brain Responses to Fairness in Asset Division: An ERP Study with the Ultimatum Game.社会比较影响资产分割公平性的大脑反应:来自最后通牒博弈的 ERP 研究。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2011 Nov 9;5:131. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00131. eCollection 2011.
3
Social distance modulates recipient's fairness consideration in the dictator game: an ERP study.
提议者身份与分配动机,哪个更重要?经济决策中的事件相关电位。
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2023 Sep 13;16:3845-3856. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S420608. eCollection 2023.
4
The Neural Response Process of Cognitive Decision Making: An ERP Study.认知决策的神经反应过程:一项事件相关电位研究
Brain Sci. 2023 Apr 11;13(4):648. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13040648.
5
Neural responses to social decision-making in suicide attempters with mental disorders.精神障碍自杀未遂者社会决策的神经反应。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Jan 9;23(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04422-z.
6
Neurocomputational evidence that conflicting prosocial motives guide distributive justice.神经计算证据表明,相互冲突的亲社会动机指导着分配公正。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Dec 6;119(49):e2209078119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2209078119. Epub 2022 Nov 29.
7
The brain dynamics of trust decisions and outcome evaluation in narcissists.自恋者信任决策与结果评估的大脑动力学
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 5;13:929674. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.929674. eCollection 2022.
8
Racial Ingroup Bias and Efficiency Consideration Influence Distributive Decisions: A Dynamic Analysis of Time Domain and Time Frequency.种族内群体偏见和效率考量影响分配决策:时域和时频的动态分析
Front Neurosci. 2021 May 10;15:630811. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.630811. eCollection 2021.
9
Morality and management: an oxymoron? fNIRS and neuromanagement perspective explain us why things are not like this.道德与管理:矛盾的统一体?功能近红外光谱技术和神经管理学视角解释了其中的缘由。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2020 Dec;20(6):1336-1348. doi: 10.3758/s13415-020-00841-1. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
10
Does unfairness sound wrong? A cross-domain investigation of expectations in music and social decision-making.不公平听起来不对吗?音乐与社会决策中期望的跨领域调查。
R Soc Open Sci. 2020 Sep 23;7(9):190048. doi: 10.1098/rsos.190048. eCollection 2020 Sep.
社会距离调节独裁者游戏中被试的公平考虑:一项 ERP 研究。
Biol Psychol. 2011 Dec;88(2-3):253-62. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.08.009. Epub 2011 Sep 2.
4
When "it" becomes "mine": attentional biases triggered by object ownership.当“它”变成“我的”:物体所有权引发的注意偏差。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Dec;23(12):3725-33. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00101. Epub 2011 Aug 3.
5
Empathic responses to others' gains and losses: an electrophysiological investigation.对他人得失的共情反应:一项电生理学研究。
Neuroimage. 2011 Feb 1;54(3):2472-80. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.10.045. Epub 2010 Oct 23.
6
To do or not to do? Action enlarges the FRN and P300 effects in outcome evaluation.做还是不做?行动会增强结果评估中的 FRN 和 P300 效应。
Neuropsychologia. 2010 Oct;48(12):3606-13. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.08.010. Epub 2010 Aug 19.
7
When decisions of others matter to me: an electrophysiological analysis.当他人的决策对我重要时:一项电生理学分析。
BMC Neurosci. 2010 Jul 29;11:86. doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-11-86.
8
Why humans deviate from rational choice.人类为何偏离理性选择。
Psychophysiology. 2011 Apr;48(4):507-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01081.x.
9
The influence of the diffusion of responsibility effect on outcome evaluations: electrophysiological evidence from an ERP study.责任扩散效应对结果评估的影响:来自 ERP 研究的电生理证据。
Neuroimage. 2010 Oct 1;52(4):1727-33. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.04.275. Epub 2010 May 7.
10
Unfair? It depends: neural correlates of fairness in social context.不公平?这取决于:社会情境中公平的神经相关物。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2010 Dec;5(4):414-23. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsq013. Epub 2010 Mar 28.