Animal Welfare Laboratory, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil.
Altern Lab Anim. 2012 May;40(2):83-90. doi: 10.1177/026119291204000207.
The use of animals in education and research is a controversial issue that involves ethical considerations. In Brazil, Act 11,794, which was approved in 2008, established the National Council on the Control of Animal Experimentation (CONCEA) and a database of institutions that use animals for research and education (CIUCA). This legislation also set out the regulations for the use of animals. In this study, we have evaluated the ethical issues involved in the use of animals for educational purposes at the Federal University of Paraná, through a qualitative-quantitative analysis that relied on written questionnaires. Our objective was to find out the opinions of students and staff from different academic fields, and at different stages in their professional development, on the use of animals for educational purposes. The study involved 101 students and 20 lecturers (i.e. tenure-track professors and all those who teach the students) in Biology, Pharmacology, Medicine and Veterinary Medicine. Approximately half of the students (45.5%) did not know the legislation that regulates the use of animals in education, and most of the lecturers believed that learning goals could not be achieved with alternative methods. Only 38.9% of the lecturers and 31.9% of the students trusted the usefulness of alternative methods. Furthermore, recent graduates were as unaware of the legislation, as were students in the first two years of their university courses. These results suggest that it is necessary to considerably expand the discussion on alternatives to animal use in the academic environment.
在教育和研究中使用动物是一个涉及伦理考虑的有争议的问题。在巴西,2008 年批准的第 11794 号法案设立了国家动物实验控制委员会(CONCEA)和一个研究和教育用动物机构数据库(CIUCA)。该立法还规定了使用动物的规定。在这项研究中,我们通过依赖书面问卷的定性-定量分析,评估了在巴拉那联邦大学(Federal University of Paraná)出于教育目的使用动物所涉及的伦理问题。我们的目的是了解来自不同学术领域和不同职业发展阶段的学生和教职员工对出于教育目的使用动物的看法。该研究涉及生物学、药理学、医学和兽医学的 101 名学生和 20 名讲师(即终身教授和所有教授学生的人)。大约一半的学生(45.5%)不知道规范教育中使用动物的立法,大多数讲师认为无法通过替代方法实现学习目标。只有 38.9%的讲师和 31.9%的学生信任替代方法的有用性。此外,最近的毕业生和大学前两年的学生一样不了解立法。这些结果表明,有必要在学术环境中就替代动物使用进行更广泛的讨论。