• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

序贯器官衰竭评估评分模型预测 ICU 收治癌症患者死亡率的验证。

Cross-validation of a Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score-based model to predict mortality in patients with cancer admitted to the intensive care unit.

机构信息

Department of Critical Care Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030-4009, USA.

出版信息

J Crit Care. 2012 Dec;27(6):673-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2012.04.018. Epub 2012 Jul 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcrc.2012.04.018
PMID:22762932
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aims to validate the performance of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score to predict death of critically ill patients with cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective observational study including adults admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2008. We randomly selected training and validation samples in medical and surgical admissions to predict ICU and in-hospital mortality. By using logistic regression, we calculated the probabilities of death in the training samples and applied them to the validation samples to test the goodness-of-fit of the models, construct receiver operator characteristics curves, and calculate the areas under the curve (AUCs).

RESULTS

In predicting mortality at discharge from the unit, the AUC from the validation group of medical admissions was 0.7851 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.7437-0.8264), and the AUC from the surgical admissions was 0.7847 (95% CI, 0.6319-0.937). The AUCs of the SOFA score to predict mortality in the hospital after ICU admission were 0.7789 (95% CI, 0.74-0.8177) and 0.7572 (95% CI, 0.6719-0.8424) for the medical and surgical validations groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The SOFA score had good discrimination to predict ICU and hospital mortality. However, the observed underestimation of ICU deaths and unsatisfactory goodness-of-fit test of the model in surgical patients to indicate calibration of the score to predict ICU mortality is advised in this group.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在验证序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分对预测癌症重症患者死亡的性能。

材料与方法

我们进行了一项回顾性观察性研究,纳入 2006 年 1 月 1 日至 2008 年 12 月 31 日期间入住重症监护病房(ICU)的成年人。我们随机选择了内科和外科入院患者的训练和验证样本,以预测 ICU 和院内死亡率。通过逻辑回归,我们计算了训练样本中死亡的概率,并将其应用于验证样本中,以检验模型的拟合优度,构建受试者工作特征曲线,并计算曲线下面积(AUC)。

结果

在预测从 ICU 出院时的死亡率方面,内科验证组的 AUC 为 0.7851(95%置信区间[CI],0.7437-0.8264),外科验证组的 AUC 为 0.7847(95%CI,0.6319-0.937)。SOFA 评分预测 ICU 后住院死亡率的 AUC 分别为内科验证组 0.7789(95%CI,0.74-0.8177)和外科验证组 0.7572(95%CI,0.6719-0.8424)。

结论

SOFA 评分对预测 ICU 和院内死亡率具有良好的区分能力。然而,观察到 ICU 死亡的低估以及外科患者模型拟合优度测试不理想,表明需要对该评分进行校准以预测 ICU 死亡率。

相似文献

1
Cross-validation of a Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score-based model to predict mortality in patients with cancer admitted to the intensive care unit.序贯器官衰竭评估评分模型预测 ICU 收治癌症患者死亡率的验证。
J Crit Care. 2012 Dec;27(6):673-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2012.04.018. Epub 2012 Jul 2.
2
Cross-validation of a modified score to predict mortality in cancer patients admitted to the intensive care unit.修正评分预测 ICU 癌症患者死亡率的交叉验证。
J Crit Care. 2011 Aug;26(4):388-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2010.10.016. Epub 2010 Dec 30.
3
Serial evaluation of the MODS, SOFA and LOD scores to predict ICU mortality in mixed critically ill patients.对多器官功能障碍综合征(MODS)、序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)和乳酸清除率(LOD)评分进行连续评估,以预测混合危重症患者的重症监护病房(ICU)死亡率。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2008 Sep;91(9):1336-42.
4
Prospective cohort study comparing sequential organ failure assessment and acute physiology, age, chronic health evaluation III scoring systems for hospital mortality prediction in critically ill cirrhotic patients.前瞻性队列研究,比较序贯器官衰竭评估和急性生理学与慢性健康状况评分系统Ⅲ在预测重症肝硬化患者医院死亡率方面的作用。
Int J Clin Pract. 2006 Feb;60(2):160-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2005.00634.x.
5
Comparison of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score with organ failure scores to predict hospital mortality.比较急性生理与慢性健康状况评估(APACHE)II评分与器官衰竭评分以预测医院死亡率。
Anaesthesia. 2007 May;62(5):466-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.04999.x.
6
Comparison of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scoring system, and Trauma and Injury Severity Score method for predicting the outcomes of intensive care unit trauma patients.比较序贯器官衰竭评估、急性生理学与慢性健康状况评分系统 II 和创伤和损伤严重程度评分方法在预测 ICU 创伤患者结局中的应用。
Am J Emerg Med. 2012 Jun;30(5):749-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2011.05.022. Epub 2011 Jul 29.
7
The prognostic value of the Modified Early Warning Score in critically ill patients: a prospective, observational study.改良早期预警评分对危重症患者预后的预测价值:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2012 Mar;29(3):152-7. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32835032d8.
8
A comparison of three organ dysfunction scores: MODS, SOFA and LOD for predicting ICU mortality in critically ill patients.三种器官功能障碍评分(MODS、SOFA和LOD)对危重症患者ICU死亡率预测的比较
J Med Assoc Thai. 2007 Jun;90(6):1074-81.
9
The Multiple Organ Dysfunction Score (MODS) versus the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score in outcome prediction.多器官功能障碍评分(MODS)与序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分在预后预测中的比较。
Intensive Care Med. 2002 Nov;28(11):1619-24. doi: 10.1007/s00134-002-1491-3. Epub 2002 Sep 6.
10
Multiple organ system failure in critically ill cirrhotic patients. A comparison of two multiple organ dysfunction/failure scoring systems.危重症肝硬化患者的多器官系统衰竭。两种多器官功能障碍/衰竭评分系统的比较。
Digestion. 2004;69(3):190-200. doi: 10.1159/000078789. Epub 2004 Jun 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of disease severity in hospitalized community-acquired pneumonia by the use of validated scoring systems.使用经过验证的评分系统评估住院社区获得性肺炎的疾病严重程度。
BMC Pulm Med. 2025 Mar 3;25(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s12890-025-03550-y.
2
Integrating ensemble and machine learning models for early prediction of pneumonia mortality using laboratory tests.整合集成模型和机器学习模型以利用实验室检查对肺炎死亡率进行早期预测。
Heliyon. 2024 Jul 14;10(14):e34525. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34525. eCollection 2024 Jul 30.
3
Machine learning for the prediction of in-hospital mortality in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage in intensive care unit.
机器学习在重症监护病房自发性脑出血患者院内死亡率预测中的应用。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 20;14(1):14195. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-65128-8.
4
SOFA score performs worse than age for predicting mortality in patients with COVID-19.SOFA 评分预测 COVID-19 患者死亡率的效果不如年龄。
PLoS One. 2024 May 17;19(5):e0301013. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301013. eCollection 2024.
5
The Clinical Utility of Albumin with Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) in Improving 30-Day Mortality Prediction in Patients with Infection in the Emergency Department.白蛋白联合序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)在改善急诊科感染患者30天死亡率预测中的临床应用
J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 14;12(24):7676. doi: 10.3390/jcm12247676.
6
Outcomes of CAR-T Cell Therapy Recipients Admitted to the ICU: In Search for a Standard of Care-A Brief Overview and Meta-Analysis of Proportions.入住重症监护病房的CAR-T细胞疗法接受者的治疗结果:寻求护理标准——比例的简要概述和荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2023 Sep 21;12(18):6098. doi: 10.3390/jcm12186098.
7
Sepsis Prediction Model for Determining Sepsis vs SIRS, qSOFA, and SOFA.用于区分脓毒症与全身炎症反应综合征(qSOFA 和 SOFA)的脓毒症预测模型。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Aug 1;6(8):e2329729. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.29729.
8
MELD-Na score, Acute Physiologic and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, and SOFA score and their association with mortality in critically ill COVID-19 patients with liver injury: A retrospective single-center study.终末期肝病模型钠评分、急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II评分及序贯器官衰竭评估评分及其与新冠肺炎合并肝损伤重症患者死亡率的关联:一项回顾性单中心研究
Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2022 Oct-Dec;12(4):222-228. doi: 10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_29_22. Epub 2022 Dec 26.
9
Machine learning for prediction of in-hospital mortality in lung cancer patients admitted to intensive care unit.机器学习在预测 ICU 收治的肺癌患者院内死亡率中的应用。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 26;18(1):e0280606. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280606. eCollection 2023.
10
Better Outcome of Off-Label High-Dose Ceftazidime in Hemato-Oncological Patients with Infections Caused by Extensively Drug-Resistant .非标签高剂量头孢他啶治疗血液肿瘤患者广泛耐药菌感染的疗效更佳
Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis. 2023 Jan 1;15(1):e2023001. doi: 10.4084/MJHID.2023.001. eCollection 2023.