• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高维与传统倾向评分在 Coxibs 与减少上消化道并发症的比较有效性研究中的应用。

High-dimensional versus conventional propensity scores in a comparative effectiveness study of coxibs and reduced upper gastrointestinal complications.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Epidemiology, BIPS-Institute for Epidemiology and Prevention Research, Achterstr. 30, 28359 Bremen, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2013 Mar;69(3):549-57. doi: 10.1007/s00228-012-1334-2. Epub 2012 Jul 5.

DOI:10.1007/s00228-012-1334-2
PMID:22763756
Abstract

PURPOSE

High-dimensional propensity score (hd-PS) adjustment has been proposed as a tool to improve control for confounding in pharmacoepidemiological studies using longitudinal claims databases. We investigated whether hd-PS matching improved confounding by indication in a study of Cox-2 inhibitors (coxibs) and traditional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (tNSAIDs) and their association with the risk of upper gastrointestinal complications (UGIC).

METHODS

In a cohort study of new users of coxibs and tNSAIDs we compared the effectiveness of these drugs to reduce UGIC using hd-PS matching and conventional propensity score (PS) matching in the German Pharmacoepidemiological Research Database.

RESULTS

The unadjusted rate ratio (RR) of UGIC for coxib users versus tNSAID users was 1.21 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.91-1.61]. The conventional PS matched cohort based on 79 investigator-identified covariates resulted in a RR of 0.84 (0.56-1.26). The use of the hd-PS algorithm based on 900 empirical covariates further decreased the RR to 0.62 (0.43-0.91).

CONCLUSIONS

A comparison of hd-PS matching versus conventional PS matching resulted in improved point estimates for studying an intended treatment effect of coxibs versus tNSAIDs when benchmarked against results from randomized controlled trials.

摘要

目的

高维倾向评分(hd-PS)调整被提议作为一种工具,以改善使用纵向索赔数据库进行药物流行病学研究的混杂控制。我们研究了在 COX-2 抑制剂(coxibs)和传统非甾体抗炎药(tNSAIDs)及其与上胃肠道并发症(UGIC)风险相关性的研究中,hd-PS 匹配是否改善了指示性混杂。

方法

在一项新使用 coxibs 和 tNSAIDs 的患者队列研究中,我们在德国药物流行病学研究数据库中比较了使用 hd-PS 匹配和传统倾向评分(PS)匹配来评估这些药物对降低 UGIC 的有效性。

结果

coxib 使用者与 tNSAID 使用者发生 UGIC 的未调整率比(RR)为 1.21[95%置信区间(CI)0.91-1.61]。基于 79 个研究者确定的协变量的传统 PS 匹配队列得出的 RR 为 0.84(0.56-1.26)。基于 900 个经验协变量的 hd-PS 算法的使用进一步将 RR 降低至 0.62(0.43-0.91)。

结论

与随机对照试验的结果相比,hd-PS 匹配与传统 PS 匹配的比较导致了 coxibs 与 tNSAIDs 治疗效果的研究中,点估计值的改善。

相似文献

1
High-dimensional versus conventional propensity scores in a comparative effectiveness study of coxibs and reduced upper gastrointestinal complications.高维与传统倾向评分在 Coxibs 与减少上消化道并发症的比较有效性研究中的应用。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2013 Mar;69(3):549-57. doi: 10.1007/s00228-012-1334-2. Epub 2012 Jul 5.
2
Risk of upper gastrointestinal complications among users of traditional NSAIDs and COXIBs in the general population.普通人群中传统非甾体抗炎药和环氧化酶-2抑制剂使用者发生上消化道并发症的风险。
Gastroenterology. 2007 Feb;132(2):498-506. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.12.007. Epub 2006 Dec 3.
3
Confounding adjustment via a semi-automated high-dimensional propensity score algorithm: an application to electronic medical records.通过半自动化高维倾向评分算法进行混杂调整:在电子病历中的应用。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2011 Aug;20(8):849-57. doi: 10.1002/pds.2152. Epub 2011 Jun 30.
4
Performance of the High-dimensional Propensity Score in a Nordic Healthcare Model.高维倾向得分在北欧医疗保健模式中的表现
Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2017 Mar;120(3):312-317. doi: 10.1111/bcpt.12716. Epub 2017 Jan 16.
5
Effects of aggregation of drug and diagnostic codes on the performance of the high-dimensional propensity score algorithm: an empirical example.药物和诊断代码聚合对高维倾向评分算法性能的影响:实证示例。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Nov 19;13:142. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-142.
6
High-dimensional propensity score adjustment in studies of treatment effects using health care claims data.使用医疗保健理赔数据进行治疗效果研究中的高维倾向得分调整
Epidemiology. 2009 Jul;20(4):512-22. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181a663cc.
7
COX-2 inhibitors: complex association with lower risk of hospitalization for gastrointestinal events compared to traditional NSAIDs plus proton pump inhibitors.环氧化酶-2(COX-2)抑制剂:与传统非甾体抗炎药加质子泵抑制剂相比,其与胃肠道事件住院风险降低之间存在复杂关联。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2009 Oct;18(10):880-90. doi: 10.1002/pds.1782.
8
Generating and evaluating a propensity model using textual features from electronic medical records.利用电子病历中的文本特征生成和评估倾向模型。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 4;14(3):e0212999. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212999. eCollection 2019.
9
Risk Factors for Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Patients Taking Selective COX-2 Inhibitors: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study.服用选择性 COX-2 抑制剂的患者发生上消化道出血的风险因素:一项全国范围内基于人群的队列研究。
Pain Med. 2018 Feb 1;19(2):225-231. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnx097.
10
Evaluation of risk profiles for gastrointestinal and cardiovascular adverse effects in nonselective NSAID and COX-2 inhibitor users: a cohort study using pharmacy dispensing data in The Netherlands.非选择性非甾体抗炎药和COX-2抑制剂使用者胃肠道及心血管不良反应风险特征评估:一项利用荷兰药房配药数据的队列研究
Drug Saf. 2008;31(2):143-58. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200831020-00004.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and Validation of a Claims-Based Model to Predict Categories of Obesity.基于索赔数据的肥胖类别预测模型的建立与验证
Am J Epidemiol. 2024 Jan 8;193(1):203-213. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwad178.
2
Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Oral Anticoagulants by Dementia Status in Older Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.比较痴呆症对老年心房颤动患者口服抗凝药的有效性和安全性。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Mar 1;6(3):e234086. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.4086.
3
High-dimensional propensity scores for empirical covariate selection in secondary database studies: Planning, implementation, and reporting.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing the comparative effectiveness of newly marketed medications: methodological challenges and implications for drug development.评估新上市药物的比较疗效:方法学挑战及对药物开发的影响。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2011 Dec;90(6):777-90. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2011.235. Epub 2011 Nov 2.
2
Effects of adjusting for instrumental variables on bias and precision of effect estimates.调整工具变量对效应估计偏差和精度的影响。
Am J Epidemiol. 2011 Dec 1;174(11):1213-22. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwr364. Epub 2011 Oct 24.
3
Re: Confounding adjustment via a semi-automated high-dimensional propensity score algorithm: an application to electronic medical records.
高维倾向得分在二次数据库研究中对经验协变量选择的应用:规划、实施和报告。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2023 Feb;32(2):93-106. doi: 10.1002/pds.5566. Epub 2022 Nov 22.
4
Utility of automated data-adaptive propensity score method for confounding by indication in comparative effectiveness study in real world Medicare and registry data.自动化数据自适应倾向评分法在真实世界 Medicare 和注册研究中用于指示性混杂的比较有效性研究中的效用。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 15;17(8):e0272975. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272975. eCollection 2022.
5
A comparison of confounder selection and adjustment methods for estimating causal effects using large healthcare databases.利用大型医疗保健数据库估计因果效应的混杂因素选择和调整方法比较。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2022 Apr;31(4):424-433. doi: 10.1002/pds.5403. Epub 2022 Jan 7.
6
Timing of AKI after urgent percutaneous coronary intervention and clinical outcomes: a high-dimensional propensity score analysis.急性肾损伤在紧急经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的时间与临床结局:高维倾向评分分析。
BMC Nephrol. 2021 Sep 6;22(1):300. doi: 10.1186/s12882-021-02513-9.
7
Perspective: Big Data and Machine Learning Could Help Advance Nutritional Epidemiology.观点:大数据和机器学习有助于推进营养流行病学。
Adv Nutr. 2021 Jun 1;12(3):621-631. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmaa183.
8
Effectiveness and Safety of Rivaroxaban 15 or 20 mg Versus Vitamin K Antagonists in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.利伐沙班 15 或 20 毫克与维生素 K 拮抗剂在非瓣膜性心房颤动中的疗效和安全性。
Stroke. 2019 Sep;50(9):2469-2476. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.025824. Epub 2019 Aug 8.
9
Generating and evaluating a propensity model using textual features from electronic medical records.利用电子病历中的文本特征生成和评估倾向模型。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 4;14(3):e0212999. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212999. eCollection 2019.
10
Association between perioperative oral care and postoperative pneumonia after cancer resection: conventional versus high-dimensional propensity score matching analysis.围手术期口腔护理与癌症切除术后肺炎的关系:常规与高维倾向评分匹配分析。
Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Sep;23(9):3581-3588. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2783-5. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
回复:通过半自动高维倾向评分算法进行混杂因素调整:在电子病历中的应用
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2011 Oct;20(10):1110-1; author reply 1112. doi: 10.1002/pds.2238.
4
Beyond the intention-to-treat in comparative effectiveness research.超越比较效果研究中的意向治疗。
Clin Trials. 2012 Feb;9(1):48-55. doi: 10.1177/1740774511420743. Epub 2011 Sep 23.
5
Confounding adjustment via a semi-automated high-dimensional propensity score algorithm: an application to electronic medical records.通过半自动化高维倾向评分算法进行混杂调整:在电子病历中的应用。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2011 Aug;20(8):849-57. doi: 10.1002/pds.2152. Epub 2011 Jun 30.
6
Simultaneously assessing intended and unintended treatment effects of multiple treatment options: a pragmatic "matrix design".同时评估多种治疗方案的预期和非预期治疗效果:一种实用的“矩阵设计”。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2011 Jul;20(7):675-83. doi: 10.1002/pds.2121. Epub 2011 May 30.
7
Covariate selection in high-dimensional propensity score analyses of treatment effects in small samples.在小样本中进行高维倾向评分分析治疗效果时的协变量选择。
Am J Epidemiol. 2011 Jun 15;173(12):1404-13. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwr001. Epub 2011 May 20.
8
Treatment effects in the presence of unmeasured confounding: dealing with observations in the tails of the propensity score distribution--a simulation study.存在未测量混杂时的处理效应:处理倾向评分分布尾部的观测值——一项模拟研究。
Am J Epidemiol. 2010 Oct 1;172(7):843-54. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwq198. Epub 2010 Aug 17.
9
A basic study design for expedited safety signal evaluation based on electronic healthcare data.基于电子医疗数据的加速安全性信号评估的基本研究设计。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2010 Aug;19(8):858-68. doi: 10.1002/pds.1926.
10
Hospitalizations for gastrointestinal and cardiovascular events in the CADEUS cohort of traditional or Coxib NSAID users.CADEUS 队列中传统或 Coxib NSAID 用户的胃肠道和心血管事件住院治疗情况。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2010 Mar;69(3):295-302. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2009.03588.x.