• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在小样本中进行高维倾向评分分析治疗效果时的协变量选择。

Covariate selection in high-dimensional propensity score analyses of treatment effects in small samples.

机构信息

Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02120, USA.

出版信息

Am J Epidemiol. 2011 Jun 15;173(12):1404-13. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwr001. Epub 2011 May 20.

DOI:10.1093/aje/kwr001
PMID:21602301
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3145392/
Abstract

To reduce bias by residual confounding in nonrandomized database studies, the high-dimensional propensity score (hd-PS) algorithm selects and adjusts for previously unmeasured confounders. The authors evaluated whether hd-PS maintains its capabilities in small cohorts that have few exposed patients or few outcome events. In 4 North American pharmacoepidemiologic cohort studies between 1995 and 2005, the authors repeatedly sampled the data to yield increasingly smaller cohorts. They identified potential confounders in each sample and estimated both an hd-PS that included 0-500 covariates and treatment effects adjusted by decile of hd-PS. For sensitivity analyses, they altered the variable selection process to use zero-cell correction and, separately, to use only the variables' exposure association. With >50 exposed patients with an outcome event, hd-PS-adjusted point estimates in the small cohorts were similar to the full-cohort values. With 25-50 exposed events, both sensitivity analyses yielded estimates closer to those obtained in the full data set. Point estimates generally did not change as compared with the full data set when selecting >300 covariates for the hd-PS. In these data, using zero-cell correction or exposure-based covariate selection allowed hd-PS to function robustly with few events. hd-PS is a flexible analytical tool for nonrandomized research across a range of study sizes and event frequencies.

摘要

为了减少非随机数据库研究中残余混杂引起的偏倚,高维倾向评分(hd-PS)算法选择和调整以前未测量的混杂因素。作者评估了在暴露患者较少或结局事件较少的小队列中,hd-PS 是否仍具有其能力。在 1995 年至 2005 年期间进行的 4 项北美的药物流行病学队列研究中,作者反复对数据进行抽样,以产生越来越小的队列。他们在每个样本中确定了潜在的混杂因素,并估计了包括 0-500 个协变量的 hd-PS 和按 hd-PS 十分位数调整的治疗效果。对于敏感性分析,他们改变了变量选择过程,使用零单元校正,并且分别仅使用变量的暴露关联。在有>50 名暴露患者发生结局事件的情况下,小队列中的 hd-PS 调整后的点估计与全队列值相似。在有 25-50 名暴露事件的情况下,两种敏感性分析都得出了更接近全数据集的估计值。与全数据集相比,当为 hd-PS 选择>300 个协变量时,点估计值通常没有变化。在这些数据中,使用零单元校正或基于暴露的协变量选择允许 hd-PS 在事件较少的情况下稳健地运行。hd-PS 是一种灵活的分析工具,适用于各种研究规模和事件频率的非随机研究。

相似文献

1
Covariate selection in high-dimensional propensity score analyses of treatment effects in small samples.在小样本中进行高维倾向评分分析治疗效果时的协变量选择。
Am J Epidemiol. 2011 Jun 15;173(12):1404-13. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwr001. Epub 2011 May 20.
2
Effects of aggregation of drug and diagnostic codes on the performance of the high-dimensional propensity score algorithm: an empirical example.药物和诊断代码聚合对高维倾向评分算法性能的影响:实证示例。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Nov 19;13:142. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-142.
3
Confounding adjustment via a semi-automated high-dimensional propensity score algorithm: an application to electronic medical records.通过半自动化高维倾向评分算法进行混杂调整:在电子病历中的应用。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2011 Aug;20(8):849-57. doi: 10.1002/pds.2152. Epub 2011 Jun 30.
4
Studies with many covariates and few outcomes: selecting covariates and implementing propensity-score-based confounding adjustments.具有众多协变量和较少结局的研究:选择协变量并实施基于倾向评分的混杂调整。
Epidemiology. 2014 Mar;25(2):268-78. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000069.
5
High-dimensional versus conventional propensity scores in a comparative effectiveness study of coxibs and reduced upper gastrointestinal complications.高维与传统倾向评分在 Coxibs 与减少上消化道并发症的比较有效性研究中的应用。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2013 Mar;69(3):549-57. doi: 10.1007/s00228-012-1334-2. Epub 2012 Jul 5.
6
The implications of propensity score variable selection strategies in pharmacoepidemiology: an empirical illustration.倾向评分变量选择策略在药物流行病学中的意义:实证说明。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2011 Jun;20(6):551-9. doi: 10.1002/pds.2098. Epub 2011 Mar 10.
7
8
Propensity score balance measures in pharmacoepidemiology: a simulation study.药物流行病学中的倾向评分平衡测量:一项模拟研究。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2014 Aug;23(8):802-11. doi: 10.1002/pds.3574. Epub 2014 Jan 29.
9
On the role of marginal confounder prevalence - implications for the high-dimensional propensity score algorithm.论边缘混杂因素患病率的作用——对高维倾向评分算法的影响
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2015 Sep;24(9):1004-7. doi: 10.1002/pds.3773. Epub 2015 Apr 10.
10
Matching by propensity score in cohort studies with three treatment groups.倾向评分匹配在三处理组队列研究中的应用。
Epidemiology. 2013 May;24(3):401-9. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e318289dedf.

引用本文的文献

1
Receiving coupons and discounts for nicotine pouches is associated with current use of nicotine pouches among United States adults: Results from the population assessment of tobacco and health (PATH) study wave 7 (2022-2023).在美国成年人中,获得尼古丁袋的优惠券和折扣与当前使用尼古丁袋有关:烟草与健康人口评估(PATH)研究第7波(2022 - 2023年)的结果。
Drug Alcohol Depend Rep. 2025 Aug 6;16:100370. doi: 10.1016/j.dadr.2025.100370. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Evaluating the role of palliative care in emergency department opioid use among advanced cancer patients.评估姑息治疗在晚期癌症患者急诊科使用阿片类药物中的作用。
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Jul 19;33(8):706. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09711-3.
3
Comparative effectiveness of robot-assisted vs. open prostatectomy: a real-life nationwide study.机器人辅助前列腺切除术与开放性前列腺切除术的比较效果:一项全国性的真实世界研究。
World J Urol. 2025 Jun 10;43(1):367. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05715-0.
4
Uncovering the gut microbiota's role in temporomandibular joint disorders: A bidirectional Mendelian randomization study.揭示肠道微生物群在颞下颌关节紊乱症中的作用:一项双向孟德尔随机化研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Jun 6;104(23):e42590. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000042590.
5
Exposure to antibiotics and risk of latent autoimmune diabetes in adults and type 2 diabetes: results from a Swedish case-control study (ESTRID) and the Norwegian HUNT study.成人潜伏性自身免疫性糖尿病及2型糖尿病与抗生素暴露风险:瑞典病例对照研究(ESTRID)和挪威HUNT研究的结果
Diabetologia. 2025 Jan;68(1):69-81. doi: 10.1007/s00125-024-06302-5. Epub 2024 Oct 28.
6
Nonbenzodiazepine hypnotics and police-reported motor vehicle crash risk among older adults: a sequential target trial emulation.非苯二氮䓬类催眠药与老年人警方报告的机动车碰撞风险:一项序贯目标试验模拟研究
Am J Epidemiol. 2025 Mar 4;194(3):662-673. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwae168.
7
Benzodiazepine use in medical cannabis authorization adult patients from 2013 to 2021: Alberta, Canada.2013 年至 2021 年期间,加拿大艾伯塔省有医疗大麻授权的成年患者使用苯二氮䓬类药物的情况。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Mar 20;24(1):859. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18356-6.
8
Combining Super Learner with high-dimensional propensity score to improve confounding adjustment: A real-world application in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.结合超级学习者和高维倾向评分提高混杂调整效果:慢性淋巴细胞白血病真实世界研究中的应用。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2024 Jan;33(1):e5678. doi: 10.1002/pds.5678. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
9
Inference with non-probability samples and survey data integration: a science mapping study.非概率样本推断与调查数据整合:一项科学图谱研究。
Metron. 2023;81(1):83-107. doi: 10.1007/s40300-023-00243-6. Epub 2023 Apr 8.
10
High-dimensional propensity scores for empirical covariate selection in secondary database studies: Planning, implementation, and reporting.高维倾向得分在二次数据库研究中对经验协变量选择的应用:规划、实施和报告。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2023 Feb;32(2):93-106. doi: 10.1002/pds.5566. Epub 2022 Nov 22.

本文引用的文献

1
The comparative safety of analgesics in older adults with arthritis.镇痛药在老年关节炎患者中的比较安全性。
Arch Intern Med. 2010 Dec 13;170(22):1968-76. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.391.
2
A basic study design for expedited safety signal evaluation based on electronic healthcare data.基于电子医疗数据的加速安全性信号评估的基本研究设计。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2010 Aug;19(8):858-68. doi: 10.1002/pds.1926.
3
Confounding control in healthcare database research: challenges and potential approaches.医疗数据库研究中的混杂控制:挑战与潜在方法。
Med Care. 2010 Jun;48(6 Suppl):S114-20. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181dbebe3.
4
Variation in the risk of suicide attempts and completed suicides by antidepressant agent in adults: a propensity score-adjusted analysis of 9 years' data.成人使用抗抑郁药后自杀未遂和自杀死亡风险的差异:一项基于9年数据的倾向评分调整分析
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2010 May;67(5):497-506. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.39.
5
Comparative safety of antidepressant agents for children and adolescents regarding suicidal acts.抗抑郁药治疗儿童和青少年自杀行为的安全性比较。
Pediatrics. 2010 May;125(5):876-88. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-2317. Epub 2010 Apr 12.
6
High-dimensional propensity score adjustment in studies of treatment effects using health care claims data.使用医疗保健理赔数据进行治疗效果研究中的高维倾向得分调整
Epidemiology. 2009 Jul;20(4):512-22. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181a663cc.
7
Instrumental variables I: instrumental variables exploit natural variation in nonexperimental data to estimate causal relationships.工具变量法 I:工具变量利用非实验数据中的自然变化来估计因果关系。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Dec;62(12):1226-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.12.005. Epub 2009 Apr 8.
8
Some methods of propensity-score matching had superior performance to others: results of an empirical investigation and Monte Carlo simulations.一些倾向得分匹配方法的性能优于其他方法:实证研究与蒙特卡罗模拟结果
Biom J. 2009 Feb;51(1):171-84. doi: 10.1002/bimj.200810488.
9
Bias formulas for external adjustment and sensitivity analysis of unmeasured confounders.未测量混杂因素的外部调整和敏感性分析的偏倚公式。
Ann Epidemiol. 2008 Aug;18(8):637-46. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2008.04.003.
10
A sensitivity analysis using information about measured confounders yielded improved uncertainty assessments for unmeasured confounding.使用测量混杂因素信息进行的敏感性分析,对未测量的混杂因素产生了改进的不确定性评估。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Mar;61(3):247-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.05.006. Epub 2007 Oct 15.