Suppr超能文献

相似文献

1
2
Confounding adjustment via a semi-automated high-dimensional propensity score algorithm: an application to electronic medical records.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2011 Aug;20(8):849-57. doi: 10.1002/pds.2152. Epub 2011 Jun 30.
4
7
Performance of the High-dimensional Propensity Score in a Nordic Healthcare Model.
Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2017 Mar;120(3):312-317. doi: 10.1111/bcpt.12716. Epub 2017 Jan 16.
9
On the role of marginal confounder prevalence - implications for the high-dimensional propensity score algorithm.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2015 Sep;24(9):1004-7. doi: 10.1002/pds.3773. Epub 2015 Apr 10.
10
Comparison of high-dimensional confounder summary scores in comparative studies of newly marketed medications.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Aug;76:200-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.02.011. Epub 2016 Feb 27.

引用本文的文献

4
Evaluation of the impact of defining observable time in real-world data on outcome incidence.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2025 Sep 1;32(9):1434-1444. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaf119.
5
Drug combination-wide association studies of cancer.
Commun Med (Lond). 2025 Jul 9;5(1):285. doi: 10.1038/s43856-025-00991-8.
9
Risk of Thyroid Tumors With GLP-1 Receptor Agonists: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Diabetes Care. 2025 Aug 1;48(8):1386-1394. doi: 10.2337/dc25-0154.

本文引用的文献

2
Invited commentary: variable selection versus shrinkage in the control of multiple confounders.
Am J Epidemiol. 2008 Mar 1;167(5):523-9; discussion 530-1. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwm355. Epub 2008 Jan 27.
3
Use of propensity score technique to account for exposure-related covariates: an example and lesson.
Med Care. 2007 Oct;45(10 Supl 2):S143-8. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318074ce79.
5
Efficacy and safety of statin monotherapy in older adults: a meta-analysis.
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2007 Aug;62(8):879-87. doi: 10.1093/gerona/62.8.879.
6
Understanding secondary databases: a commentary on "Sources of bias for health state characteristics in secondary databases".
J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Jul;60(7):648-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.10.019. Epub 2007 Feb 26.
8
Selective prescribing led to overestimation of the benefits of lipid-lowering drugs.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Aug;59(8):819-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.12.012. Epub 2006 May 26.
10
Variable selection and raking in propensity scoring.
Stat Med. 2007 Feb 28;26(5):1022-33. doi: 10.1002/sim.2591.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验