Suppr超能文献

结肠镜检查的肠道准备:聚乙二醇低容量溶液与比沙可啶联用对比比沙可啶与甘露醇溶液的前瞻性随机对照研究。

Bowel preparation for performing a colonoscopy: prospective randomized comparison study between a low-volume solution of polyethylene glycol and bisacodyl versus bisacodyl and a mannitol solution.

作者信息

Vieira Manoel Carlos, Hashimoto Claudio Lyoiti, Carrilho Flair José

机构信息

Diagnostic Center of Gastroenterology, Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital das Clínicas University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

Arq Gastroenterol. 2012 Apr-Jun;49(2):162-8. doi: 10.1590/s0004-28032012000200012.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Colonoscopy is currently the gold standard method to examine the colon, the rectum and the terminal ileum. In order to perform the colonoscopy, it is necessary to clean the bowel and use medications that are generally poorly tolerated by the patients.

OBJECTIVE

Compare the tolerability, acceptability, safety and efficacy of two solutions used for intestinal preparation for a colonoscopy.

METHODS

One hundred patients matched for sex and age were prospective randomized into two groups. Polyethylene glycol group received bisacodyl 10 mg plus 1 L of polyethylene glycol the night before and 1 L on the day of the exam. Mannitol group received bisacodyl 20 mg the day before and 1 L of a 10% mannitol solution on the day of the exam. The diet was the same for both groups. Tolerability and acceptability were measured using previously validated questionnaires. In terms of safety, variations in vital signs before and after the preparation were recorded, in addition to any complications. The quality of the preparation was graded based on the Boston and Ottawa scales.

RESULTS

Ninety-six percent (96%) completed the study. As for tolerability, the mannitol preparation group exhibited a significantly higher frequency of nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and abdominal distension than polyethylene glycol group (P < 0.05). Acceptability was significantly better in polyethylene glycol group. The polyethylene glycol solution has also previously been shown to be safer than mannitol. No difference was observed in the quality of the preparation between the two preparation methods.

CONCLUSIONS

The following conclusions can be made: polyethylene glycol solution had higher tolerability, acceptability, and safety than the mannitol and should be used instead of mannitol. Both preparation solutions have similar efficacy.

摘要

背景

结肠镜检查目前是检查结肠、直肠和回肠末端的金标准方法。为了进行结肠镜检查,有必要清洁肠道并使用患者通常耐受性较差的药物。

目的

比较两种用于结肠镜检查肠道准备的溶液的耐受性、可接受性、安全性和有效性。

方法

将100名年龄和性别匹配的患者前瞻性随机分为两组。聚乙二醇组在检查前一晚服用10毫克比沙可啶加1升聚乙二醇,检查当天服用1升。甘露醇组在检查前一天服用20毫克比沙可啶,检查当天服用1升10%甘露醇溶液。两组饮食相同。使用先前验证的问卷测量耐受性和可接受性。在安全性方面,记录准备前后生命体征的变化以及任何并发症。根据波士顿和渥太华量表对准备质量进行分级。

结果

96%的患者完成了研究。在耐受性方面,甘露醇制剂组恶心、呕吐、腹痛和腹胀的发生率明显高于聚乙二醇组(P<0.05)。聚乙二醇组的可接受性明显更好。聚乙二醇溶液先前也已被证明比甘露醇更安全。两种准备方法在准备质量上未观察到差异。

结论

可以得出以下结论:聚乙二醇溶液比甘露醇具有更高的耐受性、可接受性和安全性,应使用聚乙二醇溶液代替甘露醇。两种准备溶液具有相似的有效性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验