• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与 2L 聚乙二醇加抗坏血酸相比,联合使用比沙可啶栓剂和 1L 聚乙二醇加抗坏血酸是一种非劣效且舒适的方案。

Combination of bisacodyl suppository and 1 L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid is a non-inferior and comfortable regimen compared to 2 L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Statistics and Data Center, Research Institute for Future Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Dig Endosc. 2020 May;32(4):600-607. doi: 10.1111/den.13548. Epub 2019 Nov 11.

DOI:10.1111/den.13548
PMID:31574170
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Appropriate bowel cleansing before colonoscopy is an important factor in increasing the detection rate of lesions. Low-volume polyethylene glycol (PEG) plus ascorbic acid (PEG-Asc) reduces the dosage of bowel preparation agent, but still presents discomfort to patients. The primary aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy of bowel cleansing between 2 L PEG-Asc (control) and 1 L PEG-Asc with bisacodyl suppository (suppository) groups, and the secondary aim was to investigate complications and tolerability between the two groups.

METHODS

This was a single-center prospective randomized controlled study. We identified 168 patients scheduled for colonoscopy between August 2017 and January 2018 and randomly assigned them to the control or to the suppository groups. Efficacy of bowel cleansing was assessed using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS), and side-effects were surveyed using questionnaires.

RESULTS

No significant difference was detected in baseline characteristics including insertion and withdrawal times, and adenoma detection rates between the two groups. Total BBPS score was 7.93 ± 1.06 and 7.74 ± 1.02 in the control and suppository groups, respectively (P = 0.22). Incidence of abdominal pain and nausea was not statistically different, whereas that of sleep disturbance and anal discomfort was higher in the control group. (P = 0.00).

CONCLUSIONS

One liter PEG-Asc with bisacodyl suppository resulted in an equivalent bowel-cleansing outcome with reduced patient discomfort compared to 2 L PEG-Asc. Therefore, PEG-Asc with bisacodyl suppository represents a potential alternative and increases patient compliance with bowel preparation.

摘要

背景与目的

结肠镜检查前进行适当的肠道清洁是提高病变检出率的重要因素。低容量聚乙二醇(PEG)联合维生素 C(PEG-Asc)可减少肠道准备剂的剂量,但仍会给患者带来不适。本研究的主要目的是比较 2L PEG-Asc(对照组)和 1L PEG-Asc 联合比沙可啶栓剂(栓剂组)两组肠道清洁效果,次要目的是调查两组之间的并发症和耐受性。

方法

这是一项单中心前瞻性随机对照研究。我们纳入了 2017 年 8 月至 2018 年 1 月间拟行结肠镜检查的 168 例患者,并将其随机分为对照组和栓剂组。采用波士顿肠道准备量表(BBPS)评估肠道清洁效果,并通过问卷调查了解不良反应。

结果

两组在插入和拔出时间以及腺瘤检出率等基线特征方面无显著差异。对照组和栓剂组的总 BBPS 评分分别为 7.93±1.06 和 7.74±1.02(P=0.22)。腹痛和恶心的发生率无统计学差异,而对照组睡眠障碍和肛门不适的发生率较高(P=0.00)。

结论

与 2L PEG-Asc 相比,1L PEG-Asc 联合比沙可啶栓剂可达到等效的肠道清洁效果,同时减轻患者的不适。因此,PEG-Asc 联合比沙可啶栓剂可能是一种替代方案,可提高患者对肠道准备的依从性。

相似文献

1
Combination of bisacodyl suppository and 1 L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid is a non-inferior and comfortable regimen compared to 2 L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid.与 2L 聚乙二醇加抗坏血酸相比,联合使用比沙可啶栓剂和 1L 聚乙二醇加抗坏血酸是一种非劣效且舒适的方案。
Dig Endosc. 2020 May;32(4):600-607. doi: 10.1111/den.13548. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
2
Comparison of a split-dose bowel preparation with 2 liters of polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid and 1 liter of polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid and bisacodyl before colonoscopy.结肠镜检查前,对比 2 升聚乙二醇加维生素 C 与 1 升聚乙二醇加维生素 C 和比沙可啶的分剂量肠道准备。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Aug;86(2):343-348. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.10.040. Epub 2016 Nov 23.
3
Comparable Efficacy of a 1-L PEG and Ascorbic Acid Solution Administered with Bisacodyl versus a 2-L PEG and Ascorbic Acid Solution for Colonoscopy Preparation: A Prospective, Randomized and Investigator-Blinded Trial.与2升聚乙二醇(PEG)和抗坏血酸溶液相比,1升PEG与抗坏血酸溶液联合比沙可啶用于结肠镜检查准备的疗效相当:一项前瞻性、随机且研究者设盲的试验
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 2;11(9):e0162051. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162051. eCollection 2016.
4
Randomised clinical trial: low-volume bowel preparation for colonoscopy - a comparison between two different PEG-based formulations.随机临床试验:结肠镜检查用低容量肠道准备 - 两种不同 PEG 制剂的比较。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2012 Oct;36(8):717-24. doi: 10.1111/apt.12026. Epub 2012 Aug 28.
5
Polyethylene Glycol-3350 (Miralax®)+1.9-L sports drink (Gatorade®)+2 tablets of bisacodyl results in inferior bowel preparation for colonoscopy compared with Polyethylene Glycol-Ascorbic Acid (MoviPrep®).与聚乙二醇 - 抗坏血酸(MoviPrep®)相比,聚乙二醇 - 3350(Miralax®)+ 1.9升运动饮料(佳得乐®)+ 2片比沙可啶用于结肠镜检查的肠道准备效果较差。
Turk J Gastroenterol. 2018 Jan;29(1):67-74. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2018.17536.
6
The use of low-volume polyethylene glycol containing ascorbic acid versus 2 L of polyethylene glycol plus bisacodyl as bowel preparation for colonoscopy.低容量含抗坏血酸聚乙二醇与2升聚乙二醇加比沙可啶作为结肠镜检查肠道准备的比较。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2015 Aug;50(8):1039-44. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2014.1000961. Epub 2015 Apr 10.
7
Comparison of Two Intensive Bowel Cleansing Regimens in Patients With Previous Poor Bowel Preparation: A Randomized Controlled Study.既往肠道准备不佳患者两种强化肠道清洁方案的比较:一项随机对照研究。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2017 Jun;112(6):951-958. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2017.53. Epub 2017 Mar 14.
8
2-Litre polyethylene glycol-citrate-simethicone plus bisacodyl versus 4-litre polyethylene glycol as preparation for colonoscopy in chronic constipation.2升聚乙二醇-柠檬酸盐-西甲硅油加比沙可啶与4升聚乙二醇用于慢性便秘患者结肠镜检查前的肠道准备比较
Dig Liver Dis. 2015 Oct;47(10):857-63. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2015.06.008. Epub 2015 Jul 6.
9
Efficacy and Safety of Sodium Picosulfate/Magnesium Citrate for Bowel Preparation in a Physically Disabled Outpatient Population: A Randomized, Endoscopist-Blinded Comparison With Ascorbic Acid-Enriched Polyethylene Glycol Solution Plus Bisacodyl (The PICO-MOVI Study).在身体残疾的门诊人群中,以聚乙二醇电解质溶液联合比沙可啶作为对照,评价匹可硫酸钠/柠檬酸镁进行肠道准备的疗效和安全性:一项随机、内镜医师设盲比较的研究(PICO-MOVI 研究)。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2018 Feb;61(2):239-249. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000956.
10
Randomized trial of 2-L polyethylene glycol + ascorbic acid versus 4-L polyethylene glycol as bowel cleansing for colonoscopy in an optimal setting.在最佳条件下,2升聚乙二醇加抗坏血酸与4升聚乙二醇用于结肠镜检查肠道准备的随机试验。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Jun;29(6):1223-8. doi: 10.1111/jgh.12521.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of the combined use of linaclotide and oral sulfate solution in bowel preparation for patients with chronic constipation undergoing colonoscopy: protocol of a prospective, randomised, controlled, single-blind clinical trial from a single centre in China.利那洛肽与口服硫酸盐溶液联合应用于慢性便秘患者结肠镜检查肠道准备的效果:来自中国单中心的一项前瞻性、随机、对照、单盲临床试验方案
BMJ Open. 2025 May 6;15(5):e099687. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099687.
2
Cleaning effect and tolerance of 16 bowel preparation regimens on adult patients before colonoscopy: a network meta-analysis.结肠镜检查前成人患者 16 种肠道准备方案的清洁效果和耐受性的网状 Meta 分析。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023 Mar 11;38(1):69. doi: 10.1007/s00384-023-04355-3.
3
Comparison of optimal bowel cleansing effects of 1L polyethylene glycol with ascorbic acid versus sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate: A randomized controlled study.1L 聚乙二醇联合抗坏血酸与匹可硫酸钠联合柠檬酸钾用于肠道准备的效果比较:一项随机对照研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 30;17(12):e0279631. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279631. eCollection 2022.
4
The Prediction of Inadequate Colon Capsule Cleansing: A Cohort Selection Guided by CC-CLEAR.结肠胶囊清洁不充分的预测:基于CC-CLEAR的队列选择
GE Port J Gastroenterol. 2021 Sep 14;29(5):311-321. doi: 10.1159/000518588. eCollection 2022 Sep.
5
Same-day single-dose large-volume split-dose regimens of polyethylene glycol for bowel preparation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.聚乙二醇用于肠道准备的同日单剂量大容量分剂量方案:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Clin Cases. 2022 Aug 6;10(22):7844-7858. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i22.7844.
6
The Effectiveness and Tolerability of a Very Low-Volume Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy Compared to Low and High-Volume Polyethylene Glycol-Solutions in the Real-Life Setting.在实际应用中,与低容量和高容量聚乙二醇溶液相比,极低容量结肠镜肠道准备的有效性和耐受性
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 May 6;12(5):1155. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12051155.
7
Efficacy of ultra-low volume (≤1 L) bowel preparation fluids: Systematic review and meta-analysis.超低容量(≤1 升)肠道准备液的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Dig Endosc. 2022 Jan;34(1):13-32. doi: 10.1111/den.14015. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
8
Nobiletin promotes the pyroptosis of breast cancer via regulation of miR-200b/JAZF1 axis.川陈皮素通过调控 miR-200b/JAZF1 轴促进乳腺癌细胞焦亡。
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2021 Jul;37(7):572-582. doi: 10.1002/kjm2.12371. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
9
Comparison of 1L Adjuvant Auxiliary Preparations with 2L Solely Polyethylene Glycol plus Ascorbic Acid Regime for Bowel Cleaning: A Meta-analysis of Randomized, Controlled Trials.1L 辅助制剂与 2L 单纯聚乙二醇加维生素 C 方案用于肠道清洁的比较:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Biomed Res Int. 2021 Feb 18;2021:6638858. doi: 10.1155/2021/6638858. eCollection 2021.