Department of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Statistics and Data Center, Research Institute for Future Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Dig Endosc. 2020 May;32(4):600-607. doi: 10.1111/den.13548. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
Appropriate bowel cleansing before colonoscopy is an important factor in increasing the detection rate of lesions. Low-volume polyethylene glycol (PEG) plus ascorbic acid (PEG-Asc) reduces the dosage of bowel preparation agent, but still presents discomfort to patients. The primary aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy of bowel cleansing between 2 L PEG-Asc (control) and 1 L PEG-Asc with bisacodyl suppository (suppository) groups, and the secondary aim was to investigate complications and tolerability between the two groups.
This was a single-center prospective randomized controlled study. We identified 168 patients scheduled for colonoscopy between August 2017 and January 2018 and randomly assigned them to the control or to the suppository groups. Efficacy of bowel cleansing was assessed using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS), and side-effects were surveyed using questionnaires.
No significant difference was detected in baseline characteristics including insertion and withdrawal times, and adenoma detection rates between the two groups. Total BBPS score was 7.93 ± 1.06 and 7.74 ± 1.02 in the control and suppository groups, respectively (P = 0.22). Incidence of abdominal pain and nausea was not statistically different, whereas that of sleep disturbance and anal discomfort was higher in the control group. (P = 0.00).
One liter PEG-Asc with bisacodyl suppository resulted in an equivalent bowel-cleansing outcome with reduced patient discomfort compared to 2 L PEG-Asc. Therefore, PEG-Asc with bisacodyl suppository represents a potential alternative and increases patient compliance with bowel preparation.
结肠镜检查前进行适当的肠道清洁是提高病变检出率的重要因素。低容量聚乙二醇(PEG)联合维生素 C(PEG-Asc)可减少肠道准备剂的剂量,但仍会给患者带来不适。本研究的主要目的是比较 2L PEG-Asc(对照组)和 1L PEG-Asc 联合比沙可啶栓剂(栓剂组)两组肠道清洁效果,次要目的是调查两组之间的并发症和耐受性。
这是一项单中心前瞻性随机对照研究。我们纳入了 2017 年 8 月至 2018 年 1 月间拟行结肠镜检查的 168 例患者,并将其随机分为对照组和栓剂组。采用波士顿肠道准备量表(BBPS)评估肠道清洁效果,并通过问卷调查了解不良反应。
两组在插入和拔出时间以及腺瘤检出率等基线特征方面无显著差异。对照组和栓剂组的总 BBPS 评分分别为 7.93±1.06 和 7.74±1.02(P=0.22)。腹痛和恶心的发生率无统计学差异,而对照组睡眠障碍和肛门不适的发生率较高(P=0.00)。
与 2L PEG-Asc 相比,1L PEG-Asc 联合比沙可啶栓剂可达到等效的肠道清洁效果,同时减轻患者的不适。因此,PEG-Asc 联合比沙可啶栓剂可能是一种替代方案,可提高患者对肠道准备的依从性。