Suppr超能文献

CT 成像标准对结核性脑膜炎诊断的可靠性和诊断性能。

Reliability and diagnostic performance of CT imaging criteria in the diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis.

机构信息

Division of Neurology, Tygerberg Hospital, University of Stellenbosch, Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e38982. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038982. Epub 2012 Jun 29.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Abnormalities on CT imaging may contribute to the diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis (TBM). Recently, an expert consensus case definition (CCD) and set of imaging criteria for diagnosing basal meningeal enhancement (BME) have been proposed. This study aimed to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity and reliability of these in a prospective cohort of adult meningitis patients.

METHODS

Initial diagnoses were based on the CCD, classifying patients into: 'Definite TBM' (microbiological confirmation), 'Probable TBM' (diagnostic score ≥10), 'Possible TBM' (diagnostic score 6-9), 'Not TBM' (confirmation of an alternative diagnosis) or 'Uncertain' (diagnostic score of <6). CT images were evaluated independently on two occasions by four experienced reviewers. Intra-rater and inter-rater agreement were calculated using the kappa statistic. Sensitivities and specificities were calculated using both 'Definite TBM' and either 'Definite TBM' or 'Probable TBM' as gold standards.

RESULTS

CT scan criteria for BME had good intra-rater agreement (κ range 0.35-0.78) and fair to moderate inter-rater agreement (κ range 0.20-0.52). Intra- and inter-rater agreement on the CCD components were good to fair (κ  =  ranges 0.47-0.81 and 0.21-0.63). Using 'Definite TBM' as a gold standard, the criteria for BME were very specific (61.5%-100%), but insensitive (5.9%-29.4%). Similarly, the imaging components of the CCD were highly specific (69.2-100%) but lacked sensitivity (0-56.7%). Similar values were found when using 'Definite TBM' or 'Probable TBM' as a gold standard.

DISCUSSION

The fair to moderate inter-rater agreement and poor sensitivities of the criteria for BME suggest that little reliance should be placed in these features in isolation. While the presence of the CCD criteria of acute infarction or tuberculoma(s) appears useful as rule-in criteria, their absence is of little help in excluding TBM. The CCD and criteria for BME, as well as any new criteria, need to be standardized and validated in prospective cohort studies.

摘要

介绍

CT 影像上的异常可能有助于结核性脑膜炎(TBM)的诊断。最近,提出了一个专家共识病例定义(CCD)和一套用于诊断基底脑膜增强(BME)的成像标准。本研究旨在评估这些标准在一组成人脑膜炎患者前瞻性队列中的敏感性、特异性和可靠性。

方法

初始诊断基于 CCD,将患者分为:“明确 TBM”(微生物学确认)、“可能 TBM”(诊断评分≥10)、“可能 TBM”(诊断评分 6-9)、“非 TBM”(确认替代诊断)或“不确定”(诊断评分<6)。由四位有经验的评审员独立对 CT 图像进行两次评估。使用 Kappa 统计量计算内部和外部观察者的一致性。使用“明确 TBM”和“明确 TBM”或“可能 TBM”作为金标准,计算敏感性和特异性。

结果

BME 的 CT 扫描标准具有良好的内部观察者一致性(κ 范围 0.35-0.78)和适度至较差的外部观察者一致性(κ 范围 0.20-0.52)。CCD 成分的内部和外部观察者一致性良好至适度(κ=范围 0.47-0.81 和 0.21-0.63)。使用“明确 TBM”作为金标准,BME 的标准非常特异(61.5%-100%),但不敏感(5.9%-29.4%)。同样,CCD 的成像成分具有高度特异性(69.2-100%),但缺乏敏感性(0-56.7%)。使用“明确 TBM”或“可能 TBM”作为金标准时,也发现了类似的值。

讨论

BME 标准的适度至较差的外部观察者一致性和敏感性较低表明,不应孤立地依赖这些特征。虽然急性梗死或结核瘤的存在(多个)作为规则纳入标准似乎有用,但它们的缺失对排除 TBM 帮助不大。CCD 和 BME 的标准以及任何新的标准都需要在前瞻性队列研究中进行标准化和验证。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验