Suppr超能文献

药物洗脱支架置入术后患者 CT 分类的支架内再狭窄血管造影模式:与有创冠状动脉造影的相关性。

Angiographic patterns of in-stent restenosis classified by computed tomography in patients with drug-eluting stents: correlation with invasive coronary angiography.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Shanghai No. 6 People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, No. 600, Yishan Road, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Eur Radiol. 2013 Jan;23(1):101-7. doi: 10.1007/s00330-012-2559-2. Epub 2012 Jul 8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of Mehran's in-stent restenosis (ISR) classification by coronary computed angiography (CCTA), with reference to invasive coronary angiography (ICA).

METHODS

Consecutive symptomatic patients, who had clinically suspected ISR and implanted stent diameter ≥ 3 mm, were prospectively enrolled in our study. Mehran's classification was employed by CCTA and ICA to classify ISR lesions into four subtypes: focal, diffuse intrastent, diffuse proliferative and total occlusion. CCTA and ICA measurement of lesion length was further compared.

RESULTS

Sixty-one patients with 101 implanted stents were included in our study. The overall sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of CCTA diagnosis of binary ISR, as shown by patient-based analysis (n = 61), were 100 % (49/49), 75 % (8/12), 92.45 % (49/53) and 100 % (8/8) respectively. Mehran's classification of CCTA correlated well with ICA findings. The diagnostic accuracy of CCTA for class I, class II, class III and class IV lesions was 92.5 %, 91.67 %, 100 % and 100 % respectively. Lesion length was assessed to be significantly longer with CCTA than with ICA (11.03 ± 5.89 mm versus 8.56 ± 4.99 mm, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Angiographic patterns of in-stent restenosis can be accurately classified by coronary computed angiography. The lesion length measured by CCTA is longer than that assessed by invasive coronary angiography.

摘要

目的

通过冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影术(CCTA)评估 Mehran 的支架内再狭窄(ISR)分类的诊断准确性,并与血管内冠状动脉造影术(ICA)进行比较。

方法

本研究前瞻性纳入了临床疑似存在 ISR 且植入支架直径≥3mm 的有症状患者。采用 CCTA 和 ICA 将 ISR 病变分为 4 种亚型:局灶性、弥漫性支架内、弥漫性增殖性和完全闭塞性。进一步比较了 CCTA 和 ICA 对病变长度的测量。

结果

本研究共纳入 61 例患者的 101 个植入支架。以患者为基础的分析(n=61)显示,CCTA 诊断二分类 ISR 的整体敏感性、特异性、PPV 和 NPV 分别为 100%(49/49)、75%(8/12)、92.45%(49/53)和 100%(8/8)。CCTA 对 Mehran 分类与 ICA 结果相关性良好。CCTA 对 I 型、II 型、III 型和 IV 型病变的诊断准确率分别为 92.5%、91.67%、100%和 100%。CCTA 评估的病变长度明显长于 ICA(11.03±5.89mm 比 8.56±4.99mm,P<0.001)。

结论

冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影术能准确地对支架内再狭窄的血管造影模式进行分类。CCTA 测量的病变长度长于血管内冠状动脉造影术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验