Suppr超能文献

挪威关于空气传播职业暴露与呼吸系统疾病的邮政调查:无回应的原因及后果

Postal survey on airborne occupational exposure and respiratory disorders in Norway: causes and consequences of non-response.

作者信息

Bakke P, Gulsvik A, Lilleng P, Overå O, Hanoa R, Eide G E

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Medicine, University of Bergen, Norway.

出版信息

J Epidemiol Community Health. 1990 Dec;44(4):316-20. doi: 10.1136/jech.44.4.316.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

The aim was to examine causes for non-response in a community survey, and how non-response influences prevalence estimates of some exposure and disease variables, and associations between the variables.

DESIGN

This was a cross sectional questionnaire study with two reminder letters. The questionnaire asked for information on smoking habits, occupational airborne exposure and respiratory disorders.

SETTING

A random sample of 4992 subjects from the general population aged 15-70 years of Hordaland County, Norway.

MAIN RESULTS

The overall response rate was 90%, with a 63% response to the initial letter. The response rates to the first and second reminder letters were 56% and 36% respectively. In 20% of the non-respondents an uncompleted questionnaire was returned with cause for non-response; in two thirds of these the cause for non-response was that the subject was not resident at the mailing address. A home visit to a random sample of 50 urban non-respondents provided further information on 29 subjects. A wrong address at the Central Population Registry and the subject's feeling of lack of personal benefit from a postal survey were the major reasons for non-response. Smokers were late respondents and subjects with respiratory disorders tended to be early respondents.

CONCLUSION

The main reasons for non-response were a wrong mailing address and a feeling of lack of personal benefit from responding. Using only the initial letter would have changed the estimated prevalence of smokers from 39% to 35%. Otherwise, the estimated prevalence of the exposure and disease variables as well as the associations between them were only slightly changed after including the respondents to the first and second reminder letters.

摘要

研究目的

本研究旨在调查社区调查中无应答的原因,以及无应答如何影响某些暴露和疾病变量的患病率估计,以及这些变量之间的关联。

设计

这是一项横断面问卷调查研究,并发送了两封催复信。问卷询问了吸烟习惯、职业空气传播暴露和呼吸系统疾病的信息。

研究地点

从挪威霍达兰郡15 - 70岁的普通人群中随机抽取4992名受试者。

主要结果

总体应答率为90%,对初始信件的应答率为63%。对第一封和第二封催复信的应答率分别为56%和36%。在20%的无应答者中,未完成的问卷被退回并说明了无应答的原因;其中三分之二无应答的原因是受试者不住在邮寄地址。对50名城市无应答者的随机样本进行家访,获得了另外29名受试者的更多信息。中央人口登记处的错误地址以及受试者认为邮政调查对个人无益处是无应答的主要原因。吸烟者回复较晚,患有呼吸系统疾病的受试者往往回复较早。

结论

无应答的主要原因是邮寄地址错误以及认为回复对个人无益处。仅使用初始信件会使吸烟者的估计患病率从39%变为35%。否则,在纳入对第一封和第二封催复信做出应答的人之后,暴露和疾病变量的估计患病率以及它们之间的关联仅略有变化。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

3
Unit Nonresponse in a Population-Based Study of Prostate Cancer.基于人群的前列腺癌研究中的单位无应答情况。
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 16;11(12):e0168364. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168364. eCollection 2016.

本文引用的文献

2
The blood pressure in a representative population sample.具有代表性的人群样本中的血压。
Acta Med Scand. 1968 Apr;183(4):293-305. doi: 10.1111/j.0954-6820.1968.tb10481.x.
5
Prevalence of respiratory symptoms in Norway.挪威呼吸道症状的患病率。
J Chronic Dis. 1972 Sep;25(9):519-44. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(72)90151-8.
6
Mail survey response by smoking status.按吸烟状况划分的邮寄调查回复情况。
Am J Epidemiol. 1974 Dec;100(6):453-7. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112057.
10
Atopy, smoking, and chronic bronchitis.特应性、吸烟与慢性支气管炎。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1987 Dec;41(4):300-5. doi: 10.1136/jech.41.4.300.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验