• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

仅仅接触金钱就会增加对自由市场体系和社会不平等的认可。

Mere exposure to money increases endorsement of free-market systems and social inequality.

机构信息

Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Gen. 2013 May;142(2):301-6. doi: 10.1037/a0029288. Epub 2012 Jul 9.

DOI:10.1037/a0029288
PMID:22774789
Abstract

The present research tested whether incidental exposure to money affects people's endorsement of social systems that legitimize social inequality. We found that subtle reminders of the concept of money, relative to nonmoney concepts, led participants to endorse more strongly the existing social system in the United States in general (Experiment 1) and free-market capitalism in particular (Experiment 4), to assert more strongly that victims deserve their fate (Experiment 2), and to believe more strongly that socially advantaged groups should dominate socially disadvantaged groups (Experiment 3). We further found that reminders of money increased preference for a free-market system of organ transplants that benefited the wealthy at the expense of the poor even though this was not the prevailing system (Experiment 5) and that this effect was moderated by participants' nationality. These results demonstrate how merely thinking about money can influence beliefs about the social order and the extent to which people deserve their station in life.

摘要

本研究旨在检验偶然接触金钱是否会影响人们对使社会不平等合法化的社会制度的认可。我们发现,与非金钱概念相比,金钱概念的微妙暗示会促使参与者更强烈地认可美国现行的社会制度(实验 1)和自由市场经济(实验 4),更强烈地断言受害者活该(实验 2),并更相信社会优势群体应该统治社会弱势群体(实验 3)。我们进一步发现,金钱的暗示会增加对有利于富人而牺牲穷人的自由市场器官移植制度的偏好,尽管这不是现行制度(实验 5),而且这种影响受到参与者国籍的调节。这些结果表明,仅仅思考金钱就可以影响人们对社会秩序的看法,以及人们对自己社会地位的认可程度。

相似文献

1
Mere exposure to money increases endorsement of free-market systems and social inequality.仅仅接触金钱就会增加对自由市场体系和社会不平等的认可。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2013 May;142(2):301-6. doi: 10.1037/a0029288. Epub 2012 Jul 9.
2
Capitalism ex cathedra. Sources of hope in tough economic times.权威的资本主义。经济困难时期的希望之源。
Health Prog. 1992 Apr;73(3):44-8.
3
Do subtle reminders of money change people's political views?金钱的微妙暗示会改变人们的政治观点吗?
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2015 Aug;144(4):e73-85. doi: 10.1037/xge0000058.
4
Through rose-colored glasses: system-justifying beliefs dampen the effects of relative deprivation on well-being and political mobilization.透过玫瑰色眼镜看世界:正当化系统的信念会削弱相对剥夺感对幸福感和政治动员的影响。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2013 Aug;39(8):991-1004. doi: 10.1177/0146167213487997. Epub 2013 May 29.
5
The psychological consequences of money.金钱的心理影响。
Science. 2006 Nov 17;314(5802):1154-6. doi: 10.1126/science.1132491.
6
Self-reported health in Poland and the United States: a comparative analysis of demographic, family and socioeconomic influences.波兰和美国的自我报告健康状况:人口、家庭和社会经济影响的比较分析。
Health (London). 2004 Jan;8(1):5-31. doi: 10.1177/1363459304038793.
7
Can everyone become highly intelligent? Cultural differences in and societal consequences of beliefs about the universal potential for intelligence.每个人都能变得非常聪明吗?智力普遍具有提升潜力的信念所存在的文化差异及其带来的社会后果。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012 Nov;103(5):787-803. doi: 10.1037/a0029263. Epub 2012 Jul 16.
8
Threat or boost? Social comparison affects older people's performance differently depending on task domain.威胁还是促进?社会比较会根据任务领域的不同,对老年人的表现产生不同的影响。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2013 Jan;68(1):23-30. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbs044. Epub 2012 Apr 18.
9
A choice mind-set increases the acceptance and maintenance of wealth inequality.选择心态会增加对财富不平等的接受和维持。
Psychol Sci. 2012 Jul 1;23(7):796-804. doi: 10.1177/0956797611434540. Epub 2012 Jun 14.
10
Associations between deprived life circumstances, wellbeing and self-rated health in a socially marginalized population.在一个社会边缘人群中,贫困生活环境、幸福感和自我评估健康之间的关联。
Eur J Public Health. 2012 Oct;22(5):647-52. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckr128. Epub 2011 Sep 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Materialism on Pro-environmental Behavior Among Youth in China: The Role of Nature Connectedness.物质主义对中国青少年环保行为的影响:自然联结的作用。
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 22;13:794816. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.794816. eCollection 2022.
2
Exposure to money modulates neural responses to outcome evaluations involving social reward.接触货币会调节涉及社会奖励的结果评估的神经反应。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2020 Jan 30;15(1):111-121. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsaa019.
3
What's next for psychology's embattled field of social priming.
陷入困境的心理学社会启动领域的下一步走向是什么。
Nature. 2019 Dec;576(7786):200-202. doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-03755-2.
4
Preventive Medicine for Person, Place, and Planet: Revisiting the Concept of High-Level Wellness in the Planetary Health Paradigm.人、地、星球的预防医学:在行星健康范式中重新审视高水平健康的概念。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jan 16;16(2):238. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16020238.
5
Limited Usefulness of Capture Procedure and Capture Percentage for Evaluating Reproducibility in Psychological Science.捕捉程序和捕捉百分比在评估心理科学可重复性方面的作用有限。
Front Psychol. 2018 Sep 11;9:1657. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01657. eCollection 2018.
6
Sociality Mental Modes Modulate the Processing of Advice-Giving: An Event-Related Potentials Study.社交心理模式调节建议给予过程:一项事件相关电位研究。
Front Psychol. 2018 Feb 6;9:42. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00042. eCollection 2018.
7
Transforming Life: A Broad View of the Developmental Origins of Health and Disease Concept from an Ecological Justice Perspective.改变生活:从生态正义视角看健康与疾病概念的发育起源的广义观点
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Nov 3;13(11):1075. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13111075.
8
Psychology, replication & beyond.心理学、复制与超越。
BMC Psychol. 2016 Jun 1;4(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s40359-016-0135-2.
9
The Effects of Activating the Money Concept on Perseverance and the Preference for Delayed Gratification in Children.激活金钱概念对儿童毅力及延迟满足偏好的影响
Front Psychol. 2016 Apr 27;7:609. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00609. eCollection 2016.
10
Selection bias, vote counting, and money-priming effects: A comment on Rohrer, Pashler, and Harris (2015) and Vohs (2015).选择偏差、计票与金钱启动效应:对罗勒、帕什勒和哈里斯(2015年)以及沃斯(2015年)的评论
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2016 May;145(5):655-63. doi: 10.1037/xge0000157.