• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于前颅底和中颅底病变的疾病特异性生活质量问卷的制定——颅底量表。

Development of a disease-specific quality-of-life questionnaire for anterior and central skull base pathology--the skull base inventory.

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

Laryngoscope. 2012 Sep;122(9):1933-42. doi: 10.1002/lary.23426. Epub 2012 Jul 9.

DOI:10.1002/lary.23426
PMID:22777574
Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Anterior and central skull base lesions and their surgical treatment (endoscopic or open approaches) can affect quality of life. A disease-specific instrument is needed to compare quality of life for different surgical approaches.

STUDY DESIGN

Items were generated using a composite strategy consisting of chart review, systematic review of skull base instruments, expert interviews, and qualitative analysis of patient focus groups. A cross-sectional survey study was performed to reduce items based on an item impact score.

METHODS

Charts of 138 patients who underwent skull base surgery were reviewed to identify physical items and domains. Five experts were interviewed for item and domain identification. Thirty-four patients were recruited into eight focus groups based on their surgical approach (open or endoscopic) and tumor location (anterior or central). Items were generated using a composite approach and then reduced into a final questionnaire using item impact scores.

RESULTS

Chart review identified 47 physical items. Systematic review revealed nine relevant instruments with 217 relevant items. Experts identified 11 domains with 69 additional items. Qualitative analysis of focus groups generated 49 items. A total of 382 items were identified and reduced to 77 items after eliminating overlapping and irrelevant items. Further item reduction using item impact scores yielded 41 items.

CONCLUSIONS

The Skull Base Inventory is a disease-specific quality-of-life instrument. Psychometric properties have yet to be tested. It may serve to compare quality of life for endoscopic or open procedures.

摘要

目的/假设:前颅底和中颅底病变及其手术治疗(内镜或开放入路)会影响生活质量。需要一种针对特定疾病的工具来比较不同手术方法的生活质量。

研究设计

使用综合策略生成项目,包括图表审查、颅底器械的系统回顾、专家访谈以及患者焦点小组的定性分析。进行横断面调查研究以根据项目影响评分减少项目。

方法

回顾了 138 例接受颅底手术患者的病历,以确定身体项目和领域。采访了 5 位专家以确定项目和领域。根据手术方法(开放或内镜)和肿瘤位置(前颅底或中颅底)将 34 例患者招募到 8 个焦点小组中。使用综合方法生成项目,然后使用项目影响评分将其减少为最终问卷。

结果

病历回顾确定了 47 个身体项目。系统回顾显示了 9 种相关仪器,其中包含 217 个相关项目。专家确定了 11 个领域,还有 69 个额外的项目。焦点小组的定性分析产生了 49 个项目。共确定了 382 个项目,在消除重叠和不相关的项目后,减少到 77 个。进一步使用项目影响评分减少项目,得出 41 个项目。

结论

颅底指数是一种针对特定疾病的生活质量工具。其心理测量学特性尚未得到测试。它可能有助于比较内镜或开放手术的生活质量。

相似文献

1
Development of a disease-specific quality-of-life questionnaire for anterior and central skull base pathology--the skull base inventory.一种用于前颅底和中颅底病变的疾病特异性生活质量问卷的制定——颅底量表。
Laryngoscope. 2012 Sep;122(9):1933-42. doi: 10.1002/lary.23426. Epub 2012 Jul 9.
2
Quality of life instruments for skull base pathology: systematic review and methodologic appraisal.颅底病理学的生活质量评估工具:系统评价和方法学评估。
Head Neck. 2013 Sep;35(9):1221-31. doi: 10.1002/hed.23120. Epub 2012 Sep 18.
3
Quality of life in patients with skull base meningiomas treated with microsurgery: a prospective observational study.采用显微手术治疗颅底脑膜瘤患者的生活质量:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2024 Oct 19;166(1):416. doi: 10.1007/s00701-024-06291-9.
4
The measurement of collaboration within healthcare settings: a systematic review of measurement properties of instruments.医疗机构内协作的测量:对测量工具属性的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):138-97. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-2159.
5
The endoscope-assisted ventral approach compared with open microscope-assisted surgery for clival chordomas.内镜辅助下经腹入路与开放显微镜辅助手术治疗颅底脊索瘤的比较。
World Neurosurg. 2011 Sep-Oct;76(3-4):318-27; discussion 259-62. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2011.02.026.
6
A systematic review of published evidence on expanded endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery and the risk of postoperative seizure.一篇关于经鼻内镜颅底扩大手术与术后癫痫风险的已发表证据的系统回顾。
J Clin Neurosci. 2013 Feb;20(2):197-203. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2012.06.010. Epub 2012 Dec 28.
7
Endoscopic Endonasal Anterior Skull Base Surgery: A Systematic Review of Complications During the Past 65 Years.鼻内镜下前颅底手术:过去65年并发症的系统评价
World Neurosurg. 2016 Nov;95:383-391. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.12.105. Epub 2016 Mar 4.
8
Psychometric validation and interpretation thresholds of the Hidradenitis Suppurativa Quality of Life (HiSQOL©) questionnaire using pooled data from the phase III BE HEARD I & II trials of bimekizumab in hidradenitis suppurativa.使用比美吉珠单抗治疗化脓性汗腺炎的III期BE HEARD I和II试验的汇总数据,对化脓性汗腺炎生活质量(HiSQOL©)问卷进行心理测量学验证和解释阈值分析。
Br J Dermatol. 2025 Jun 20;193(1):93-104. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljaf067.
9
The experience of adults who choose watchful waiting or active surveillance as an approach to medical treatment: a qualitative systematic review.选择观察等待或主动监测作为治疗方法的成年人的经历:一项定性系统评价。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Feb;14(2):174-255. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2016-2270.
10
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of enzyme replacement therapy for Gaucher's disease: a systematic review.戈谢病酶替代疗法的临床疗效和成本效益:一项系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Jul;10(24):iii-iv, ix-136. doi: 10.3310/hta10240.

引用本文的文献

1
The skull base chordoma patient reported outcome survey (sbCPROS): a patient-centered, disease-specific tool for assessing quality of life in chordoma patients.颅底脊索瘤患者报告结局调查(sbCPROS):一种以患者为中心、针对特定疾病的工具,用于评估脊索瘤患者的生活质量。
J Neurooncol. 2025 May;173(1):157-166. doi: 10.1007/s11060-025-04974-6. Epub 2025 Feb 19.
2
Multi-Institutional Comparison of Quality of Life Between Open Versus Endoscopic Skull Base Approaches.开放手术与内镜颅底手术入路患者生活质量的多机构比较
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2025 Jan 21;10(1):e70082. doi: 10.1002/lio2.70082. eCollection 2025 Feb.
3
Quality of Life Considerations in Endoscopic Endonasal Management of Anterior Cranial Base Tumors.
前颅底肿瘤鼻内镜鼻内治疗中的生活质量考量
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Dec 28;15(1):195. doi: 10.3390/cancers15010195.
4
Integration of an enhanced recovery after surgery program for patients undergoing pituitary surgery.为垂体手术患者整合术后加速康复计划。
World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 May 2;8(4):330-338. doi: 10.1016/j.wjorl.2021.04.004. eCollection 2022 Dec.
5
Skull Base Registries: A Roadmap.颅底登记处:路线图。
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2022 Nov 12;83(6):561-578. doi: 10.1055/a-1934-9191. eCollection 2022 Dec.
6
Patient-Reported Outcomes in Endoscopic Endonasal Skull Base Surgery.内镜经鼻颅底手术中的患者报告结局。
Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2022 Dec;51(4):727-739. doi: 10.1016/j.ecl.2022.04.005. Epub 2022 Sep 24.
7
Averting Delayed Complications of Open Anterior Skull Base Surgery.避免开放性前颅底手术的延迟并发症
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2020 Aug 5;82(4):450-455. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1714097. eCollection 2021 Aug.
8
Functional Outcomes and Quality of Life in Patients with Sinonasal, Nasopharyngeal, and Anterior Skull Base Tumors.鼻窦、鼻咽和前颅底肿瘤患者的功能结局与生活质量
Curr Oncol Rep. 2022 Jun;24(6):775-781. doi: 10.1007/s11912-022-01214-2. Epub 2022 Mar 15.
9
Quality of Life and Morbidity after Endoscopic Endonasal Skull Base Surgeries Using the Sinonasal Outcomes Test (SNOT): A Tertiary Hospital Experience.使用鼻窦结局测试(SNOT)评估鼻内镜下鼻颅底手术后的生活质量和发病率:一家三级医院的经验
Int J Otolaryngol. 2021 May 8;2021:6659221. doi: 10.1155/2021/6659221. eCollection 2021.
10
Quality-of-life evaluation for patients submitted to nasal endoscopic surgery for resection of pituitary tumours.对接受鼻内镜手术切除垂体瘤的患者进行生活质量评估。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 May;278(5):1411-1418. doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-06381-1. Epub 2020 Sep 28.