• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用病历中的时间模式从适应症中识别药物不良事件。

Using temporal patterns in medical records to discern adverse drug events from indications.

作者信息

Liu Yi, Lependu Paea, Iyer Srinivasan, Shah Nigam H

机构信息

Stanford University, Stanford, CA.

出版信息

AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2012;2012:47-56. Epub 2012 Mar 19.

PMID:22779050
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3392062/
Abstract

Researchers estimate that electronic health record systems record roughly 2-million ambulatory adverse drug events and that patients suffer from adverse drug events in roughly 30% of hospital stays. Some have used structured databases of patient medical records and health insurance claims recently-going beyond the current paradigm of using spontaneous reporting systems like AERS-to detect drug-safety signals. However, most efforts do not use the free-text from clinical notes in monitoring for drug-safety signals. We hypothesize that drug-disease co-occurrences, extracted from ontology-based annotations of the clinical notes, can be examined for statistical enrichment and used for drug safety surveillance. When analyzing such co-occurrences of drugs and diseases, one major challenge is to differentiate whether the disease in a drug-disease pair represents an indication or an adverse event. We demonstrate that it is possible to make this distinction by combining the frequency distribution of the drug, the disease, and the drug-disease pair as well as the temporal ordering of the drugs and diseases in each pair across more than one million patients.

摘要

研究人员估计,电子健康记录系统记录了约200万起门诊药物不良事件,并且在大约30%的住院期间患者会遭遇药物不良事件。一些人最近利用患者病历和健康保险理赔的结构化数据库——超越了目前使用如AERS等自发报告系统的模式——来检测药物安全信号。然而,大多数努力并未在监测药物安全信号时使用临床记录中的自由文本。我们假设,从基于本体的临床记录注释中提取的药物-疾病共现情况,可以进行统计富集检查并用于药物安全监测。在分析此类药物和疾病的共现情况时,一个主要挑战是区分药物-疾病对中的疾病是代表适应症还是不良事件。我们证明,通过结合药物、疾病以及药物-疾病对的频率分布,以及超过100万名患者中每对药物和疾病的时间顺序,可以做出这种区分。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65dd/3392062/6830f2c41339/47-joint_summit_c2012f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65dd/3392062/1680e4ba711b/47-joint_summit_c2012f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65dd/3392062/2b373bb90907/47-joint_summit_c2012f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65dd/3392062/ceefda2ec1d0/47-joint_summit_c2012f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65dd/3392062/bf12ea5aa131/47-joint_summit_c2012f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65dd/3392062/951b235243e2/47-joint_summit_c2012f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65dd/3392062/6830f2c41339/47-joint_summit_c2012f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65dd/3392062/1680e4ba711b/47-joint_summit_c2012f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65dd/3392062/2b373bb90907/47-joint_summit_c2012f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65dd/3392062/ceefda2ec1d0/47-joint_summit_c2012f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65dd/3392062/bf12ea5aa131/47-joint_summit_c2012f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65dd/3392062/951b235243e2/47-joint_summit_c2012f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65dd/3392062/6830f2c41339/47-joint_summit_c2012f6.jpg

相似文献

1
Using temporal patterns in medical records to discern adverse drug events from indications.利用病历中的时间模式从适应症中识别药物不良事件。
AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2012;2012:47-56. Epub 2012 Mar 19.
2
Database size and power to detect safety signals in pharmacovigilance.药物警戒中检测安全信号的数据库规模与效能
Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2007 Nov;6(6):713-21. doi: 10.1517/14740338.6.6.713.
3
Drug-versus-drug adverse event rate comparisons: a pilot study based on data from the US FDA Adverse Event Reporting System.药物与药物不良事件发生率比较:一项基于美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统数据的试点研究。
Drug Saf. 2009;32(2):137-46. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200932020-00006.
4
Comparing drug safety of hepatitis C therapies using post-market data.利用上市后数据比较丙型肝炎治疗药物的安全性。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Aug 8;19(Suppl 4):147. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0860-6.
5
Structured assessment for prospective identification of safety signals in electronic medical records: evaluation in the health improvement network.用于前瞻性识别电子病历中安全信号的结构化评估:在健康改善网络中的评估
Drug Saf. 2015 Jan;38(1):87-100. doi: 10.1007/s40264-014-0251-y.
6
Use of screening algorithms and computer systems to efficiently signal higher-than-expected combinations of drugs and events in the US FDA's spontaneous reports database.在美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)的自发报告数据库中,使用筛查算法和计算机系统来有效地标记高于预期的药物与事件组合。
Drug Saf. 2002;25(6):381-92. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200225060-00001.
7
A signal detection method for temporal variation of adverse effect with vaccine adverse event reporting system data.一种基于疫苗不良事件报告系统数据的不良效应时间变化的信号检测方法。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 Jul 5;17(Suppl 2):76. doi: 10.1186/s12911-017-0472-y.
8
Using Probabilistic Record Linkage of Structured and Unstructured Data to Identify Duplicate Cases in Spontaneous Adverse Event Reporting Systems.利用结构化和非结构化数据的概率性记录链接来识别自发不良事件报告系统中的重复病例。
Drug Saf. 2017 Jul;40(7):571-582. doi: 10.1007/s40264-017-0523-4.
9
Learning signals of adverse drug-drug interactions from the unstructured text of electronic health records.从电子健康记录的非结构化文本中学习不良药物相互作用的信号。
AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2013 Mar 18;2013:83-7. eCollection 2013.
10
Learning signals of adverse drug-drug interactions from the unstructured text of electronic health records.从电子健康记录的非结构化文本中学习药物不良相互作用的信号。
AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2013 Mar 18;2013:98. eCollection 2013.

引用本文的文献

1
Applying Natural Language Processing to Textual Data From Clinical Data Warehouses: Systematic Review.将自然语言处理应用于临床数据仓库中的文本数据:系统评价。
JMIR Med Inform. 2023 Dec 15;11:e42477. doi: 10.2196/42477.
2
An extensive survey on the use of supervised machine learning techniques in the past two decades for prediction of drug side effects.对过去二十年中使用监督式机器学习技术预测药物副作用的情况进行的一项广泛调查。
Artif Intell Rev. 2023 Feb 15:1-28. doi: 10.1007/s10462-023-10413-7.
3
Extraction of Temporal Information from Clinical Narratives.

本文引用的文献

1
Analyzing patterns of drug use in clinical notes for patient safety.分析临床记录中的用药模式以保障患者安全。
AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2012;2012:63-70. Epub 2012 Mar 19.
2
Unified Medical Language System term occurrences in clinical notes: a large-scale corpus analysis.临床记录中统一医学语言系统术语的出现:大规模语料库分析。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 Jun;19(e1):e149-56. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000744. Epub 2012 Apr 4.
3
Overcoming barriers to NLP for clinical text: the role of shared tasks and the need for additional creative solutions.
从临床叙述中提取时间信息
J Healthc Inform Res. 2019 Feb 27;3(2):220-244. doi: 10.1007/s41666-019-00049-0. eCollection 2019 Jun.
4
What Can We Learn About Drug Safety and Other Effects in the Era of Electronic Health Records and Big Data That We Would Not Be Able to Learn From Classic Epidemiology?在电子健康记录和大数据时代,我们能从经典流行病学中学到哪些关于药物安全性和其他影响的知识,而这些知识是我们无法从经典流行病学中学到的?
J Surg Res. 2020 Feb;246:599-604. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.09.053. Epub 2019 Oct 22.
5
Natural Language Processing for EHR-Based Pharmacovigilance: A Structured Review.基于电子健康记录的药物警戒中的自然语言处理:系统综述。
Drug Saf. 2017 Nov;40(11):1075-1089. doi: 10.1007/s40264-017-0558-6.
6
Dramatyping: a generic algorithm for detecting reasonable temporal correlations between drug administration and lab value alterations.药物作用模式分型:一种用于检测药物给药与实验室检查值变化之间合理时间相关性的通用算法。
PeerJ. 2016 Mar 24;4:e1851. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1851. eCollection 2016.
7
The Safety of Drug Therapy in Children.儿童药物治疗的安全性。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2015 Nov 13;112(46):781-7. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2015.0781.
8
Towards a Computable Data Corpus of Temporal Correlations between Drug Administration and Lab Value Changes.迈向药物给药与实验室值变化之间时间相关性的可计算数据语料库。
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 24;10(8):e0136131. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136131. eCollection 2015.
9
A method for systematic discovery of adverse drug events from clinical notes.一种从临床记录中系统发现药物不良事件的方法。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Nov;22(6):1196-204. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv102. Epub 2015 Jul 31.
10
Application of clinical text data for phenome-wide association studies (PheWASs).临床文本数据在表型全基因组关联研究(PheWAS)中的应用。
Bioinformatics. 2015 Jun 15;31(12):1981-7. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv076. Epub 2015 Feb 4.
克服临床文本自然语言处理的障碍:共享任务的作用及对其他创造性解决方案的需求。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Sep-Oct;18(5):540-3. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000465.
4
Realizing the full potential of electronic health records: the role of natural language processing.实现电子健康记录的全部潜力:自然语言处理的作用。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Sep-Oct;18(5):539. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000501.
5
A knowledge discovery and reuse pipeline for information extraction in clinical notes.临床笔记中信息抽取的知识发现和重用管道。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Sep-Oct;18(5):574-9. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000302. Epub 2011 Jul 7.
6
Detecting drug interactions from adverse-event reports: interaction between paroxetine and pravastatin increases blood glucose levels.从不良反应报告中检测药物相互作用:帕罗西汀和普伐他汀相互作用会增加血糖水平。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2011 Jul;90(1):133-42. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2011.83. Epub 2011 May 25.
7
Using information mining of the medical literature to improve drug safety.利用医学文献的信息挖掘来提高药物安全性。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Sep-Oct;18(5):668-74. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000096. Epub 2011 May 5.
8
'Global trigger tool' shows that adverse events in hospitals may be ten times greater than previously measured.“全球触发工具”显示,医院中的不良事件可能比之前测量的高出十倍。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Apr;30(4):581-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0190.
9
The FDA drug safety surveillance program: adverse event reporting trends.美国食品药品监督管理局药品安全监测项目:不良事件报告趋势
Arch Intern Med. 2011 Mar 28;171(6):591-3. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.89.
10
Biclustering of adverse drug events in the FDA's spontaneous reporting system.药物不良反应的 FDA 自发报告系统中的双聚类分析。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2011 Feb;89(2):243-50. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2010.285. Epub 2010 Dec 29.