Zahid R, Alalade A, Sylvestre Y, Leeson S C
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, Bangor, Wales, UK.
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012 Aug;32(6):572-5. doi: 10.3109/01443615.2012.689895.
The objective of the study was to see if colposcopy training can provide a measurable effect. A questionnaire containing 10 clinical scenarios requiring colposcopy was completed by delegates attending three colposcopy training courses in Europe. A total of 128 and 132 questionnaires were returned pre- and post-training, respectively. The means and standard deviations for the number of correctly assessed scenarios were M = 4.21, SD = 1.71 at pre-training and M = 5.05, SD = 1.82 at post-training. The χ(2)-test showed a statistically significant difference in the proportions of correct answers at pre- and post-training for five questions. The two factor ANOVA showed that there is a statistically significant difference between the pre- and post-training measures (F((2,124)) = 17.13, p < 0.001) although the effect of training is not the same for all three locations. Trainees' results show that there is a positive effect of training. The questionnaire may be used as a quality tool for measuring the effectiveness of training for colposcopy.
该研究的目的是确定阴道镜检查培训是否能产生可衡量的效果。参加欧洲三个阴道镜检查培训课程的学员完成了一份包含10个需要进行阴道镜检查的临床场景的问卷。培训前和培训后分别共收回128份和132份问卷。正确评估场景数量的均值和标准差在培训前为M = 4.21，SD = 1.71，培训后为M = 5.05，SD = 1.82。卡方检验显示，五个问题在培训前和培训后的正确答案比例存在统计学显著差异。双因素方差分析表明，培训前和培训后的测量结果存在统计学显著差异（F((2,124)) = 17.13，p < 0.001），尽管培训效果在所有三个地点并不相同。学员的结果表明培训有积极效果。该问卷可作为衡量阴道镜检查培训效果的质量工具。
