• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重症监护中的审计。疾病严重程度的急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统（APACHE II）分类。

Audit in intensive care. The APACHE II classification of severity of disease.

作者信息

Chisakuta A M, Alexander J P

机构信息

Intensive Care Unit, Belfast City Hospital.

出版信息

Ulster Med J. 1990 Oct;59(2):161-7.

PMID:2278113
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2448306/
Abstract

The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation System (APACHE II) was used in 451 patients admitted to the intensive care unit, Belfast City Hospital, in 1988 and 1989. Mortality in the patients studied was 15.5% which is slightly less than that predicted for patients with equal severity of disease (18.8%). Within the limitations discussed the APACHE II system has valuable potential both in terms of predictive power and as a means of audit.

摘要

1988年和1989年，贝尔法斯特市医院重症监护病房收治的451例患者采用了急性生理与慢性健康评估系统（APACHE II）。所研究患者的死亡率为15.5%，略低于疾病严重程度相同的患者所预测的死亡率（18.8%）。在所述局限性范围内，APACHE II系统在预测能力和作为一种审计手段方面都具有宝贵的潜力。

相似文献

1
Audit in intensive care. The APACHE II classification of severity of disease.重症监护中的审计。疾病严重程度的急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统（APACHE II）分类。
Ulster Med J. 1990 Oct;59(2):161-7.
2
Predictors of mortality in a medical intensive care unit.医学重症监护病房的死亡率预测因素
Natl Med J India. 1997 Nov-Dec;10(6):270-2.
3
The outcome of acute renal failure in the intensive care unit according to RIFLE: model application, sensitivity, and predictability.根据RIFLE标准评估重症监护病房中急性肾衰竭的预后：模型应用、敏感性及可预测性
Am J Kidney Dis. 2005 Dec;46(6):1038-48. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2005.08.033.
4
Readmission to surgical intensive care increases severity-adjusted patient mortality.再次入住外科重症监护病房会增加经病情严重程度调整后的患者死亡率。
J Trauma. 2006 May;60(5):1027-31. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000218217.42861.b7.
5
Evaluation of the APACHE II scoring system in an Israeli intensive care unit.以色列重症监护病房中急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统（APACHE II）的评估。
Isr J Med Sci. 1994 Jul;30(7):514-20.
6
Complicated acute myocardial infarction requiring mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit: prognostic factors of clinical outcome in a series of 157 patients.重症监护病房中需要机械通气的复杂急性心肌梗死：157例患者临床结局的预后因素
Crit Care Med. 2004 Jan;32(1):100-5. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000098605.58349.76.
7
[Application of the acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II score system to patients with infection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in lower respiratory tract in intensive care unit].急性生理与慢性健康状况评估II评分系统在重症监护病房铜绿假单胞菌下呼吸道感染患者中的应用
Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2003 Nov;15(11):662-5.
8
Acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE II) scoring in the Medical Intensive Care Unit, National University Hospital, Singapore.新加坡国立大学医院重症监护病房的急性生理学与慢性健康状况评估（APACHE II）评分
Singapore Med J. 1993 Feb;34(1):41-4.
9
Experience with the APACHE II severity of disease scoring system in predicting outcome in a surgical intensive therapy unit.急性生理学及慢性健康状况评分系统（APACHE II）在外科重症监护病房预测预后方面的应用经验。
J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1991 Feb;36(1):37-40.
10
Acute pancreatitis in intensive care unit patients: value of clinical and radiologic prognosticators at predicting clinical course and outcome.重症监护病房患者的急性胰腺炎：临床和影像学预后指标对预测临床病程及结局的价值
Crit Care Med. 2003 Apr;31(4):1026-30. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000049951.77583.85.

引用本文的文献

1
Intensive Care Society's APACHE II study in Britain and Ireland--II: Outcome comparisons of intensive care units after adjustment for case mix by the American APACHE II method.重症监护学会在英国和爱尔兰开展的急性生理学及慢性健康状况评分系统（APACHE II）研究——II：采用美国APACHE II方法对病例组合进行调整后各重症监护病房的结局比较
BMJ. 1993 Oct 16;307(6910):977-81. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6910.977.
2
Intensive Care Society's APACHE II study in Britain and Ireland--I: Variations in case mix of adult admissions to general intensive care units and impact on outcome.重症监护协会在英国和爱尔兰开展的急性生理学及慢性健康状况评分系统（APACHE II）研究——I：成人入住综合重症监护病房病例组合的差异及其对预后的影响
BMJ. 1993 Oct 16;307(6910):972-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6910.972.

本文引用的文献

1
Intensive care in the Belfast city hospital. The first two years-an audit.贝尔法斯特市医院的重症监护。头两年——一项审计。
Ulster Med J. 1981;50(2):99-104.
2
An evaluation of outcome from intensive care in major medical centers.大型医疗中心重症监护结果评估。
Ann Intern Med. 1986 Mar;104(3):410-8. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-104-3-410.
3
Mortality and quality of life after intensive care for critical illness.危重病重症监护后的死亡率和生活质量。
Intensive Care Med. 1988;14(3):217-20. doi: 10.1007/BF00717992.
4
Audit of intensive care: a 30 month experience using the Apache II severity of disease classification system.重症监护审计：使用急性生理学及慢性健康状况评分系统（Apache II）进行疾病严重程度分类的30个月经验。
Intensive Care Med. 1988;14(5):567-74. doi: 10.1007/BF00263531.
5
Predicting outcome among intensive care unit patients using computerised trend analysis of daily Apache II scores corrected for organ system failure.通过对因器官系统功能衰竭校正后的每日急性生理学及慢性健康状况评分系统（Apache II）评分进行计算机化趋势分析来预测重症监护病房患者的预后。
Intensive Care Med. 1988;14(5):558-66. doi: 10.1007/BF00263530.
6
Comparison of clinical assessment with APACHE II for predicting mortality risk in patients admitted to a medical intensive care unit.在入住内科重症监护病房的患者中，比较临床评估与急性生理学及慢性健康状况评分系统II（APACHE II）对预测死亡风险的作用。
JAMA. 1988;260(12):1739-42.
7
Survival compared to the general population and changes in health status among intensive care patients.与普通人群相比，重症监护患者的生存率及健康状况变化。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1989 Jan;33(1):6-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1989.tb02850.x.
8
A clinical sickness score for the critically ill in Central Africa.
Intensive Care Med. 1989;15(7):467-70. doi: 10.1007/BF00255604.
9
The changing challenges of critical care.
Intensive Care Med. 1989;15(7):415-6. doi: 10.1007/BF00255593.
10
Quality of life and survival following intensive medical care.
Q J Med. 1989 Apr;71(264):347-57.