Department of Oral Medicine/Dental Research Center, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Oct;41(10):1265-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2012.06.001. Epub 2012 Jul 9.
A comparative evaluation of low-level laser and CO(2) laser therapies was performed, for the treatment of oral lichen planus (OLP). In a randomized open clinical trial, 28 patients with 57 lesions were randomly assigned to two groups. One group received CO(2) laser therapy, the other received low-level laser therapy (LLLT) for 5 sessions every other day. Participants were examined before the treatment, after 2 weeks, and at 1, 2 and 3 months, to assess the changes in sign and symptom scores. Improvements in size of lesions, in pain and clinical response scores were achieved in both groups. After 3 months, clinical response showed 100% and 85% partial to complete improvement in LLLT and CO(2) laser surgery, respectively. This demonstrates a quick and pronounced beneficial effect in controlling symptoms related to OLP. Both methods may be effective in the treatment of OLP, and can be used as alternative therapy alongside standard treatment modalities. The present study showed that LLLT displayed better results than CO(2) laser therapy as alternative or additional therapy, but further investigations in comparison with standard treatment modalities with a prolonged follow-up period will be necessary to confirm the efficacy of laser therapy in the treatment of OLP.
一项关于低水平激光和 CO2 激光治疗口腔扁平苔藓(OLP)的对比评估。在一项随机开放临床试验中,28 名患者的 57 处病变被随机分为两组。一组接受 CO2 激光治疗,另一组接受低水平激光治疗(LLLT),每两天治疗 5 次。参与者在治疗前、治疗后 2 周以及治疗后 1、2 和 3 个月接受检查,以评估症状和体征评分的变化。两组患者的病变大小、疼痛和临床反应评分均有所改善。3 个月后,LLLT 和 CO2 激光手术的临床反应分别显示 100%和 85%的部分至完全改善。这表明激光治疗在控制 OLP 相关症状方面具有快速而显著的有益效果。两种方法均可有效治疗 OLP,并可作为标准治疗方法的替代疗法。本研究表明,与 CO2 激光治疗相比,LLLT 作为替代或附加治疗具有更好的效果,但需要进一步进行与标准治疗方法比较的研究,并延长随访时间,以确认激光治疗在治疗 OLP 方面的疗效。