Maas E, Barlow J, Robin D, Shapiro L
San Diego State University, CA, USA.
Aphasiology. 2002 Jan 1;16(4-6):609-622. doi: 10.1080/02687030244000266. Epub 2010 Aug 31.
Recent research suggests that the complexity of treatment stimuli influences the effectiveness of treatment. However, no studies have examined the role of complexity on sound production treatment in adult individuals with sound production impairments. AIMS: This study examines effects of syllable complexity on treatment outcome in two patients with acquired sound production problems. Complexity is defined in terms of syllable structure: clusters are more complex than singletons. Using a single-subject multiple-baseline design, we address the question: Is treatment of complex syllables more effective than treatment of simple syllables? METHODS #ENTITYSTARTX00026; PROCEDURES: Two patients with aphasia and apraxia of speech were trained to produce complex or simple syllables (using modelling). Improvement was measured by percent correct on a word and nonword repetition test. OUTCOMES #ENTITYSTARTX00026; RESULTS: We found that both treatment on simple syllables and treatment on complex syllables led to improved production of simple syllables, while treatment of complex syllables also led to improvement on some complex syllables for one of the two patients. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggests that training complex items is more effective than training simple items, at least for some patients. Possible reasons for lack of stronger effects are discussed, as well as directions for future research.
近期研究表明,治疗刺激的复杂性会影响治疗效果。然而,尚无研究探讨复杂性在患有发声障碍的成年个体的发声治疗中的作用。
本研究考察音节复杂性对两名患有后天性发声问题患者治疗结果的影响。复杂性根据音节结构来定义:音节群比单音节更复杂。采用单被试多基线设计,我们探讨以下问题:复杂音节的治疗是否比简单音节的治疗更有效?
对两名患有失语症和言语失用症的患者进行训练,使其发出复杂或简单音节(采用示范法)。通过单词和非单词重复测试的正确百分比来衡量改善情况。
我们发现,简单音节治疗和复杂音节治疗均使简单音节的发声得到改善,而对于两名患者中的一名,复杂音节治疗也使一些复杂音节的发声得到改善。
这些结果表明,至少对某些患者而言,训练复杂项目比训练简单项目更有效。文中讨论了缺乏更强效果的可能原因以及未来研究的方向。