• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

公众对刑事司法政策的看法:受害经历会产生影响吗?

Public perceptions of criminal justice policy: does victimization make a difference?

作者信息

Rich R F, Sampson R J

机构信息

Institute of Government and Public Affairs, University of Illinois.

出版信息

Violence Vict. 1990 Summer;5(2):109-18.

PMID:2278951
Abstract

In this paper we examine public perceptions of criminal justice policy and public attitudes toward victims. We are particularly interested in exploring the relationship between the use of social science data and the adoption of public policy affecting victims of crime. To do this we analyze a representative sample of over 450 residents of the Chicago metropolitan area in 1983. The specific issues examined include attitudes toward rape (e.g., whether caused by victim's behavior), prosecution of marital rape, plea bargaining, sentencing of predatory offenders, and the relative importance and efficacy of rehabilitation, incapacitation, and retribution as goals of punishment. Overall, the results suggest that age and education have the most important influence on public attitudes regarding these criminal justice policies. Surprisingly, victimization status does not emerge as a salient predictor of criminal justice perceptions. We conclude with a call for greater use of social science surveys as information input into local and federal decision making on criminal justice policy.

摘要

在本文中,我们研究了公众对刑事司法政策的看法以及公众对受害者的态度。我们特别感兴趣的是探索社会科学数据的使用与影响犯罪受害者的公共政策的采用之间的关系。为此,我们分析了1983年芝加哥大都市区450多名居民的代表性样本。所研究的具体问题包括对强奸的态度(例如,是否由受害者的行为引起)、婚内强奸的起诉、认罪谈判、掠夺性犯罪者的量刑,以及康复、监禁和报复作为惩罚目标的相对重要性和有效性。总体而言,结果表明年龄和教育程度对公众对这些刑事司法政策的态度影响最大。令人惊讶的是,受害状况并未成为刑事司法认知的显著预测因素。我们呼吁更多地使用社会科学调查作为地方和联邦刑事司法政策决策的信息输入。

相似文献

1
Public perceptions of criminal justice policy: does victimization make a difference?公众对刑事司法政策的看法:受害经历会产生影响吗?
Violence Vict. 1990 Summer;5(2):109-18.
2
Contributions of family violence research to criminal justice policy on wife assault: paradigms of science and social control.家庭暴力研究对针对妻子袭击的刑事司法政策的贡献:科学与社会控制范式
Violence Vict. 1988 Fall;3(3):159-86.
3
Crime and punishment: is "justice" good public policy?罪与罚:“正义”是良好的公共政策吗?
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2008;36(3):385-7.
4
Future law enforcement officers and social workers: perceptions of domestic violence.未来的执法官员和社会工作者:对家庭暴力的看法。
J Interpers Violence. 2010 Aug;25(8):1367-87. doi: 10.1177/0886260509346062. Epub 2009 Oct 29.
5
Female sexual abuse and criminal justice intervention: a comparison of child protective service and criminal justice samples.女性性虐待与刑事司法干预:儿童保护服务与刑事司法样本的比较
Child Abuse Negl. 2008 Jan;32(1):111-9. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2007.04.014.
6
Political orientation and perceptions of adolescent autonomy and judicial culpability.政治倾向以及对青少年自主性和司法罪责的认知。
Behav Sci Law. 2009 Jan-Feb;27(1):29-34. doi: 10.1002/bsl.851.
7
Moving beyond the individual: examining the effects of domestic violence policies on social norms.超越个体层面:审视家庭暴力政策对社会规范的影响。
Am J Community Psychol. 2003 Dec;32(3-4):253-64. doi: 10.1023/b:ajcp.0000004746.31861.e7.
8
Obstacles to victims' cooperation with the criminal prosecution of their abusers: the role of social support.
Violence Vict. 1999 Winter;14(4):427-44.
9
Apology in the criminal justice setting: evidence for including apology as an additional component in the legal system.刑事司法背景下的道歉:将道歉纳入法律体系作为附加组成部分的证据。
Behav Sci Law. 2002;20(4):337-62. doi: 10.1002/bsl.495.
10
Taking guns from batterers: public support and policy implications.从施暴者手中收缴枪支:公众支持及政策影响。
Eval Rev. 2006 Jun;30(3):361-73. doi: 10.1177/0193841X06287217.