Baliński Andrzej, Sun Yuanlin, Dzik Jerzy
Instytut Paleobiologii PAN, Twarda 51/55, 00-818, Warszawa, Poland.
Naturwissenschaften. 2012 Aug;99(8):645-53. doi: 10.1007/s00114-012-0947-8. Epub 2012 Jul 12.
Phosphatic (possibly secondarily phosphatised) remains of antipatharian coralla, previously unknown in the fossil record, occur abundantly in the early Ordovician Fenxiang Formation in the Hubei Province, southern China. Probably two species (and genera) are represented, which differ in spinosity of branches. The more spinose one, Sinopathes reptans, has its lateral spines bearing regular, longitudinally arranged costellae. The early Floian geological age of this finding, about 470 Ma, supports predictions on the timing of anthozoan phylogeny derived from the molecular phylogenetic evidence. Black corals (Antipatharia) are basal to the scleractinians in the Hexacorallia clade, being more derived than sea anemones and the Zoantharia. Based on calibration of the molecular clock with Mesozoic data, the first split of lineages within the scleractinian hexacorals was proposed to take place approximately 425 million years ago. This implies that the origin of Antipatharia should precede this date. They have not been known in the fossil record because of unmineralised skeleton composed primarily of laminar chitin complexed with a protein. Unlike all recent species, the encrusting basal part of the colony dominated in the Ordovician ones and only occasionally erect branches developed, rather chaotically ramified. This presumably plesiomorphic trait seems consistent with ancient geological age and suggests that some problematic fossils from the Late Cambrian may be their, even less-derived, relatives.
在中国南方湖北省早奥陶世的坟山组中,大量出现了反珊瑚目珊瑚的磷酸盐化(可能是次生磷酸盐化)遗迹,这在化石记录中此前尚不为人知。这里可能代表了两个物种(及属),它们在分支的刺状程度上有所不同。刺状程度更高的一种是爬行中华黑珊瑚(Sinopathes reptans),其侧刺上有规则的纵向排列的小肋。这一发现的地质年代为早弗洛期,约4.7亿年前,支持了从分子系统发育证据得出的关于珊瑚虫系统发育时间的预测。黑珊瑚(反珊瑚目)是六放珊瑚亚纲石珊瑚目的基部类群,比海葵和花筒珊瑚更进化。根据用中生代数据校准的分子钟,石珊瑚六放珊瑚亚纲内谱系的首次分裂被认为大约发生在4.25亿年前。这意味着反珊瑚目的起源应该早于此日期。由于其骨骼主要由与蛋白质复合的层状几丁质组成,未矿化,因此在化石记录中一直不为人知。与所有现存物种不同,奥陶纪的群体以覆盖的基部部分为主,只有偶尔会发育出直立的分支,且分支相当混乱。这种大概是近祖性状似乎与古老的地质年代相符,并表明寒武纪晚期一些有问题的化石可能是它们的、甚至是更原始的亲属。