Medina Mónica, Collins Allen G, Takaoka Tori L, Kuehl Jennifer V, Boore Jeffrey L
Department of Evolutionary Genomics, Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, 2800 Mitchell Drive, Walnut Creek, CA 94598, USA.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jun 13;103(24):9096-100. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0602444103. Epub 2006 Jun 5.
Stony corals, which form the framework for modern reefs, are classified as Scleractinia (Cnidaria, Anthozoa, and Hexacorallia) in reference to their external aragonitic skeletons. However, persistent notions, collectively known as the "naked coral" hypothesis, hold that the scleractinian skeleton does not define a natural group. Three main lines of evidence have suggested that some stony corals are more closely related to one or more of the soft-bodied hexacorallian groups than they are to other scleractinians: (i) morphological similarities; (ii) lack of phylogenetic resolution in molecular analyses of scleractinians; and (iii) discrepancy between the commencement of a diverse scleractinian fossil record at 240 million years ago (Ma) and a molecule-based origination of at least 300 Ma. No molecular evidence has been able to clearly reveal relationships at the base of a well supported clade composed of scleractinian lineages and the nonskeletonized Corallimorpharia. We present complete mitochondrial genome data that provide strong evidence that one clade of scleractinians is more closely related to Corallimorpharia than it is to a another clade of scleractinians. Thus, the scleractinian skeleton, which we estimate to have originated between 240 and 288 Ma, was likely lost in the ancestry of Corallimorpharia. We estimate that Corallimorpharia originated between 110 and 132 Ma during the late- to mid-Cretaceous, coinciding with high levels of oceanic CO(2), which would have impacted aragonite solubility. Corallimorpharians escaped extinction from aragonite skeletal dissolution, but some modern stony corals may not have such fortunate fates under the pressure of increased anthropogenic CO(2) in the ocean.
石珊瑚构成了现代珊瑚礁的框架,根据其外部文石骨骼被归类为石珊瑚目(刺胞动物门、珊瑚纲、六放珊瑚亚纲)。然而,一些长期存在的观点,统称为“裸珊瑚”假说,认为石珊瑚目的骨骼并不能界定一个自然类群。有三条主要证据表明,某些石珊瑚与一个或多个软质六放珊瑚类群的关系比它们与其他石珊瑚目的关系更为密切:(i)形态相似性;(ii)石珊瑚目分子分析中缺乏系统发育分辨率;(iii)2.4亿年前(Ma)多样化的石珊瑚目化石记录开始与基于分子的至少3亿年前起源之间的差异。没有分子证据能够清楚地揭示由石珊瑚目谱系和无骨骼的珊瑚藻组成的一个得到充分支持的进化枝基部的关系。我们提供了完整的线粒体基因组数据,有力地证明了一个石珊瑚目进化枝与珊瑚藻的关系比它与另一个石珊瑚目进化枝的关系更为密切。因此,我们估计起源于2.4亿至2.88亿年前的石珊瑚目骨骼,很可能在珊瑚藻的祖先中消失了。我们估计珊瑚藻起源于白垩纪晚期至中期的1.1亿至1.32亿年前,与海洋中高浓度的二氧化碳同时出现,这会影响文石的溶解度。珊瑚藻从文石骨骼溶解中逃脱了灭绝,但在海洋中人为二氧化碳增加的压力下,一些现代石珊瑚可能没有如此幸运的命运。