Li Hailiang, Cui Xiaoli, Tong Yan, Gong Muxin
College of Pharmacy of Chinese Medicine, Capital University of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100069, China.
Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi. 2012 Apr;37(7):908-12.
To compare inclusion effects and process conditions of two preparation methods-colloid mill and saturated solution-for beta-CD inclusion compound of four traditional Chinese medicine volatile oils and study the relationship between each process condition and volatile oil physical properties and the regularity of selective inclusion of volatile oil components.
Volatile oils from Nardostachyos Radix et Rhizoma, Amomi Fructus, Zingiberis Rhizoma and Angelicaesinensis Radix were prepared using two methods in the orthogonal test. These inclusion compounds by optimized processes were assessed and compared by such methods as TLC, IR and scanning electron microscope. Inclusion oils were extracted by steam distillation, and the components found before and after inclusion were analyzed by GC-MS.
Analysis showed that new inclusion compounds, but inclusion compounds prepared by the two processes had differences to some extent. The colloid mill method showed a better inclusion effect than the saturated solution method, indicating that their process conditions had relations with volatile oil physical properties. There were differences in the inclusion selectivity of components between each other.
The colloid mill method for inclusion preparation is more suitable for industrial requirements. To prepare volatile oil inclusion compounds with heavy gravity and high refractive index, the colloid mill method needs longer time and more water, while the saturated solution method requires higher temperature and more beta-cyclodextrin. The inclusion complex prepared with the colloid mill method contains extended molecular weight chemical composition, but the kinds of components are reduced.
比较胶体磨法和饱和溶液法两种制备方法对四种中药挥发油β-环糊精包合物的包合效果及工艺条件,研究各工艺条件与挥发油物理性质的关系以及挥发油成分的选择性包合规律。
采用两种方法对甘松、砂仁、干姜、当归挥发油进行正交试验制备。通过薄层色谱法(TLC)、红外光谱法(IR)和扫描电子显微镜等方法对优化工艺后的包合物进行评价和比较。采用水蒸气蒸馏法提取包合油,用气相色谱-质谱联用仪(GC-MS)分析包合前后的成分。
分析表明,制备出了新的包合物,但两种工艺制备的包合物在一定程度上存在差异。胶体磨法的包合效果优于饱和溶液法,说明其工艺条件与挥发油物理性质有关。各成分之间的包合选择性存在差异。
胶体磨法制备包合物更适合工业需求。制备相对密度大、折光率高的挥发油包合物时,胶体磨法需要更长时间和更多的水,而饱和溶液法需要更高的温度和更多的β-环糊精。胶体磨法制备的包合物包含分子量较大的化学成分,但成分种类减少。