Suppr超能文献

澳大利亚养老院临终关怀路径的可接受性和可行性。

Acceptability and feasibility of end-of-life care pathways in Australian residential aged care facilities.

机构信息

La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC.

出版信息

Med J Aust. 2012 Jul 16;197(2):106-9. doi: 10.5694/mja11.11518.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the acceptability and feasibility of using end-of-life (EOL) care pathways in residential aged care facilities (RACFs).

DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Multistage action research approach involving interviews, surveys and prospective audits of deaths and EOL care pathway use among residents and staff of RACFs and associated general practitioners from 14 RACFs in Victoria and South Australia between April 2009 and July 2010.

INTERVENTION

Introduction of EOL care pathways.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Evidence of acceptability was determined by the rate of pathway use in RACFs and through feedback from RACF managers, staff and GPs. Evidence of feasibility was determined by reductions in transfers to hospital for symptom management before death, length of time on pathways, and whether care was consistent with best practice at EOL.

RESULTS

The use of EOL care pathways across the RACFs fell into low-, moderate- and high-uptake groups (for 10%, 34% and 68% of all deaths at the facility, respectively). Feedback from RACF staff and GPs indicated that acceptability was critical to successful implementation. The use of EOL care pathways demonstrated improvements in care, sometimes over extended periods. There were fewer unnecessary admissions to hospital before death, although not all RACF staff and GPs were aware of the project.

CONCLUSION

EOL care pathways are feasible strategies for delivering EOL care consistent with best practice. However, their introduction into Australian RACFs needs to include strategies to facilitate acceptability by RACF staff and GPs.

摘要

目的

调查在养老院中使用临终关怀路径的可接受性和可行性。

设计、设置和参与者:采用多阶段行动研究方法,对 2009 年 4 月至 2010 年 7 月期间,维多利亚州和南澳大利亚州的 14 家养老院及其相关的全科医生,对养老院居民和工作人员的死亡和临终关怀路径使用情况进行了访谈、调查和前瞻性审计。

干预措施

引入临终关怀路径。

主要观察指标

养老院采用临终关怀路径的比例,以及养老院经理、工作人员和全科医生的反馈来确定可接受性的证据。可行性的证据是通过在死亡前减少因症状管理而转往医院的次数、路径使用时间长短以及临终关怀是否符合最佳实践来确定的。

结果

在养老院中,临终关怀路径的使用情况分为低、中、高采用率组(分别占设施内所有死亡人数的 10%、34%和 68%)。来自养老院工作人员和全科医生的反馈表明,可接受性是成功实施的关键。临终关怀路径的使用改善了护理,有时持续较长时间。在死亡前,到医院接受不必要治疗的情况减少了,尽管并非所有养老院工作人员和全科医生都了解该项目。

结论

临终关怀路径是提供符合最佳实践的临终关怀的可行策略。然而,要将其引入澳大利亚养老院,需要包括一些策略来促进养老院工作人员和全科医生的接受度。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验