Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
CNS Spectr. 2012 Dec;17(4):207-13. doi: 10.1017/S1092852912000545. Epub 2012 Jul 2.
Pathological gambling (PG) is a severe and persistent pattern of problem gambling that has been aligned with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). However, no study has compared the neurocognitive profiles of individuals with PG and OCD.
We compared neurocognitive functioning, including executive function, verbal learning and memory, and visual-spatial organization and memory among 16 pathological gamblers, 31 drug-naïve OCD subjects, and 52 healthy controls.
The only neurocognitive marker common to both groups was increased fragmentation errors on the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test (ROCF). The PG subjects showed increased nonperseverative error on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test and organization difficulties in the ROCF, whereas the OCD subjects revealed longer response times on the Stroop test and retention difficulties on the immediate recall scale of the ROCF.
A more careful approach is required in considering whether PG is a part of the OCD spectrum, as little evidence of neurocognitive overlap between PG and OCD has been reported.
病理性赌博(PG)是一种严重且持续的赌博问题模式,已与强迫症(OCD)相一致。然而,尚无研究比较 PG 和 OCD 个体的神经认知特征。
我们比较了 16 名病理性赌博者、31 名未经药物治疗的强迫症患者和 52 名健康对照组的神经认知功能,包括执行功能、言语学习和记忆以及视觉空间组织和记忆。
两组唯一共有的神经认知标记是 Rey-Osterrieth 复杂图形测试(ROCF)中增加的片段错误。PG 组在威斯康星卡片分类测试中表现出增加的非持续性错误和 ROCF 中的组织困难,而 OCD 组在 Stroop 测试中表现出更长的反应时间和 ROCF 即时回忆量表上的保留困难。
需要更仔细地考虑 PG 是否是 OCD 谱的一部分,因为已经报道了 PG 和 OCD 之间神经认知重叠的证据很少。