Suppr超能文献

前列腺癌盆腔淋巴结转移的定位。

Mapping of pelvic lymph node metastases in prostate cancer.

机构信息

Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Eur Urol. 2013 Mar;63(3):450-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.06.057. Epub 2012 Jul 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Opinions about the optimal lymph node dissection (LND) template in prostate cancer differ. Drainage and dissemination patterns are not necessarily identical.

OBJECTIVE

To present a precise overview of the lymphatic drainage pattern and to correlate those findings with dissemination patterns. We also investigated the relationship between the number of positive lymph nodes (LN+) and resected lymph nodes (LNs) per region.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Seventy-four patients with localized prostate adenocarcinoma were prospectively enrolled. Patients did not show suspect LNs on computed tomography scan and had an LN involvement risk of ≥ 10% but ≤ 35% (Partin tables) or a cT3 tumor.

INTERVENTION

After intraprostatic technetium-99m nanocolloid injection, patients underwent planar scintigraphy and single-photon emission computed tomography imaging. Then surgery was performed, starting with a sentinel node (SN) procedure and a superextended lymphadenectomy followed by radical prostatectomy.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Distribution of scintigraphically detected SNs and removed SNs per region were registered. The number of LN+, as well as the percentage LN+ of the total number of removed LNs per region, was demonstrated in combining data of all patients. The impact of the extent of LND on N-staging and on the number of LN+ removed was calculated.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

A total of 470 SNs were scintigraphically detected (median: 6; interquartile range [IQR]: 3-9), of which 371 SNs were removed (median: 4; IQR: 2.25-6). In total, 91 LN+ (median: 2; IQR: 1-3) were found in 34 of 74 patients. The predominant site for LN+ was the internal iliac region. An extended LND (eLND) would have correctly staged 32 of 34 patients but would have adequately removed all LN+ in only 26 of 34 patients. When adding the presacral region, these numbers increased to 33 of 34 and 30 of 34 patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Standard eLND would have correctly staged the majority of LN+ patients, but 13% of the LN+ would have been missed. Adding the presacral LNs to the template should be considered to obtain a minimal template with maximal gain. NOTE: This manuscript was invited based on the 2011 European Association of Urology meeting in Vienna.

摘要

背景

对于前列腺癌最佳淋巴结清扫(LND)模板的意见存在分歧。引流和扩散模式不一定相同。

目的

本文旨在精确概述淋巴引流模式,并将这些发现与扩散模式相关联。我们还研究了阳性淋巴结(LN+)数量与每个区域切除的淋巴结(LNs)之间的关系。

设计、设置和参与者:前瞻性纳入 74 例局部前列腺腺癌患者。患者在计算机断层扫描上未显示可疑淋巴结,且 LN 受累风险≥10%但≤35%(Partin 表)或 cT3 肿瘤。

干预

在前列腺内锝-99m 纳米胶体注射后,患者进行平面闪烁扫描和单光子发射计算机断层扫描成像。然后进行手术,首先进行前哨淋巴结(SN)手术和超扩展淋巴结清扫术,然后进行根治性前列腺切除术。

观察指标和统计学分析

记录每个区域中放射性示踪 SN 和切除的 SN 的分布情况。在结合所有患者的数据后,展示每个区域的 LN+数量以及每个区域中切除的 LNs 总数中 LN+的百分比。计算 LND 范围对 N 分期和 LN+切除数量的影响。

结果和局限性

共检测到 470 个 SN(中位数:6;四分位距 [IQR]:3-9),其中 371 个 SN 被切除(中位数:4;IQR:2.25-6)。总共在 74 例患者中的 34 例中发现 91 个 LN+(中位数:2;IQR:1-3)。LN+的主要部位是髂内区。广泛的 LND(eLND)将正确分期 34 例中的 32 例,但仅能充分切除 34 例中的 26 例 LN+。当添加骶前区域时,这些数字分别增加到 34 例中的 33 例和 34 例中的 30 例。

结论

标准 eLND 将正确分期大多数 LN+患者,但会漏诊 13%的 LN+。应考虑将骶前淋巴结加入模板,以获得最小模板但最大获益。

注意

本文基于维也纳 2011 年欧洲泌尿外科学会会议的邀请而撰写。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验