Suppr超能文献

测试 MDS 3.0 的 PHQ-9 访谈版和观察版(PHQ-9 OV)。

Testing the PHQ-9 interview and observational versions (PHQ-9 OV) for MDS 3.0.

机构信息

UCLA/Jewish Home Borun Center for Gerontological Research, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

出版信息

J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2012 Sep;13(7):618-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2012.06.003. Epub 2012 Jul 15.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To test the feasibility and validity of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 item interview (PHQ-9) and the newly developed Patient Health Questionnaire Observational Version (PHQ-9 OV) for screening for mood disorder in nursing home populations.

METHODS

The PHQ-9 was tested as part of the national Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS 3.0) evaluation study among 3822 residents scheduled for MDS 2.0 assessments. Residents from 71 community nursing homes (NHs) in eight states were randomly included in a feasibility sample (n = 3258) and a validation sample (n = 418). Each resident's ability to communicate determined whether the PHQ-9 interview or the PHQ-9 OV was initially attempted. In the validation sample, trained research nurses administered the instruments. For residents in the validation sample without severe cognitive impairment (3 MS ≥30) agreement between PHQ-9 and the modified Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia (m-SADS) was measured with weighted kappas (κ). For residents with severe cognitive impairment (3MS <30), agreement between PHQ-9 interview or PHQ-9 OV and the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia (Cornell Scale) was measured using correlation coefficients. Staff impressions were obtained from an anonymous survey mailed to all MDS assessors.

RESULTS

The PHQ-9 was completed in 86% of the 3258 residents in the feasibility sample. In the validation sample, the agreement between PHQ-9 and m-SADS was very good (weighted κ = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.61-0.76), whereas agreement between MDS 2.0 and m-SADS was poor (weighted κ = 0.15, 95% CI = 0.06-0.25). Likewise, in residents with severe cognitive impairment, PHQ correlations with the criterion standard Cornell Scale were superior to the MDS 2.0 for both the PHQ-9 (0.63 vs 0.34) and the PHQ-9 OV (0.84 vs 0.28). Eighty-six percent of survey respondents reported that the PHQ-9 provided new insight into residents' mood. The average time for completing the PHQ-9 interview was 4 minutes.

DISCUSSION

Compared with the MDS 2.0 observational items, the PHQ-9 interview had greater agreement with criterion standard diagnostic assessments. For residents who could not complete the interview, the PHQ-9 OV also had greater agreement with a criterion measure for depression than did the MDS 2.0 observational items. Moreover, the majority of NH residents were able to complete the PHQ-9, and most surveyed staff reported improved assessments with the new approach.

摘要

目的

测试患者健康问卷-9 项访谈(PHQ-9)和新开发的患者健康问卷观察版本(PHQ-9 OV)在疗养院人群中筛查情绪障碍的可行性和有效性。

方法

PHQ-9 作为国家最低数据集 3.0(MDS 3.0)评估研究的一部分进行了测试,该研究纳入了 3822 名计划接受 MDS 2.0 评估的居民。来自八个州的 71 家社区疗养院(NH)的居民被随机纳入可行性样本(n=3258)和验证样本(n=418)。根据每个居民的沟通能力,确定最初尝试使用 PHQ-9 访谈还是 PHQ-9 OV。在验证样本中,经过培训的研究护士使用这些工具进行评估。对于验证样本中没有严重认知障碍的居民(3MS≥30),使用加权 Kappa(κ)测量 PHQ-9 与改良情感障碍和精神分裂症时间表(m-SADS)之间的一致性。对于有严重认知障碍的居民(3MS<30),使用相关系数测量 PHQ-9 访谈或 PHQ-9 OV 与康奈尔痴呆症抑郁量表(Cornell Scale)之间的一致性。从寄给所有 MDS 评估员的匿名调查中获得了工作人员的印象。

结果

在可行性样本中的 3258 名居民中,86%完成了 PHQ-9。在验证样本中,PHQ-9 与 m-SADS 之间的一致性非常好(加权 κ=0.69,95%CI=0.61-0.76),而 MDS 2.0 与 m-SADS 之间的一致性较差(加权 κ=0.15,95%CI=0.06-0.25)。同样,在有严重认知障碍的居民中,PHQ 与标准标准康奈尔量表的相关性优于 MDS 2.0,PHQ-9 为 0.63,PHQ-9 OV 为 0.84。86%的调查受访者报告说,PHQ-9 提供了对居民情绪的新见解。完成 PHQ-9 访谈的平均时间为 4 分钟。

讨论

与 MDS 2.0 观察项目相比,PHQ-9 访谈与标准诊断评估具有更高的一致性。对于无法完成访谈的居民,PHQ-9 OV 与抑郁的标准衡量标准的一致性也高于 MDS 2.0 观察项目。此外,大多数 NH 居民能够完成 PHQ-9,并且大多数接受调查的工作人员报告说,新方法改善了评估。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验