Suppr超能文献

评估精神分裂症中的抑郁症状: Calgary 精神分裂症抑郁量表与汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表的心理计量学比较。

Evaluating depressive symptoms in schizophrenia: a psychometric comparison of the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia and the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Psychopathology. 2012;45(5):276-85. doi: 10.1159/000336729. Epub 2012 Jul 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare two measures of depression in patients with schizophrenia and schizophrenia spectrum disorder, including patients with delusional and schizoaffective disorder, to conclude implications for their application.

SAMPLING AND METHODS

A total of 278 patients were assessed using the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS) and the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17). The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) was also applied. At admission and discharge, a principal component analysis was performed with each depression scale. The two depression rating scales were furthermore compared using correlation and regression analyses.

RESULTS

Three factors were revealed for the CDSS and HAMD-17 factor component analysis. A very similar item loading was found for the CDSS at admission and discharge, whereas results of the loadings of the HAMD-17 items were less stable. The first two factors of the CDSS revealed correlations with positive, negative and general psychopathology. In contrast, multiple significant correlations were found for the HAMD-17 factors and the PANSS subscores. Multiple regression analyses demonstrated that the HAMD-17 accounted more for the positive and negative symptom domains than the CDSS.

CONCLUSIONS

The present results suggest that compared to the HAMD-17, the CDSS is a more specific instrument to measure depressive symptoms in schizophrenia and schizophrenia spectrum disorder, especially in acutely ill patients.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在比较两种用于评估精神分裂症和精神分裂症谱系障碍患者(包括妄想性和分裂情感性障碍患者)抑郁症状的方法,以总结其应用的影响。

方法

共有 278 名患者接受了 Calgary 精神分裂症抑郁量表(CDSS)和 Hamilton 抑郁评定量表(HAMD-17)的评估。还应用了阳性和阴性综合征量表(PANSS)。在入院和出院时,对每个抑郁量表进行主成分分析。还使用相关性和回归分析比较了两种抑郁评定量表。

结果

CDSS 和 HAMD-17 因子成分分析分别揭示了三个因素。在入院和出院时,CDSS 的项目负荷非常相似,而 HAMD-17 项目的负荷结果则不太稳定。CDSS 的前两个因子与阳性、阴性和一般精神病学相关。相比之下,HAMD-17 因子与 PANSS 分量表之间存在多个显著的相关性。多元回归分析表明,HAMD-17 比 CDSS 更能解释阳性和阴性症状领域。

结论

与 HAMD-17 相比,CDSS 是一种更能特异性测量精神分裂症和精神分裂症谱系障碍患者抑郁症状的工具,尤其是在急性发病的患者中。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验