Department of Neonatology, Charité University Medical Center, Berlin, Germany.
Neonatology. 2012;102(3):190-5. doi: 10.1159/000339325. Epub 2012 Jul 10.
Mask leak is a frequent problem during manual ventilation. Our aim was to investigate the effect of predefined leaks on delivered peak inflation pressure (PIP), positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and tidal volume (V(t)) when using different neonatal manual ventilation devices.
A neonatal-lung model was ventilated at different respiratory rates (RRs, 40, 60, 80/min) using a mechanically operated self-inflating bag (SIB) and a manually operated T-piece resuscitator (PIP = 20 cm H(2)O, PEEP = 5 cm H(2)O). Four open tubes of different lengths, which produced up to 90% leak, were consecutively attached between the ventilation device and the lung model. A pneumotachograph was used to measure pressures, flow and volume.
With increasing leak (0-90%) PIP and PEEP decreased significantly (p < 0.001) for both devices. Using the SIB, the mean ± SD PIP fell from 20.1 ± 0.3 to 15.9 ± 7 cm H(2)O and PEEP fell from 5.0 ± 0 to 0.3 ± 0.5 cm H(2)O, leading to an increased pressure difference (Δp); V(t) increased from 8.8 ± 0.7 to 11.1 ± 0.8 ml (p < 0.001). With increasing RRs, the leak-dependent changes were significantly lower (p < 0.001). Using the T-piece resuscitator, PIP dropped independent of RRs from 20.3 ± 0.5 to 18.5 ± 0.6 cm H(2)O and PEEP from 5.1 ± 0.4 to 4.0 ± 0 cm H(2)O, while Δp and V(t) did not differ significantly.
The decrease in PIP and PEEP with increasing leak is RR dependent and distinctly higher when using an SIB compared to a T-piece device. In contrast to V(t) delivered with the SIB, V(t) delivered by the T-piece resuscitator was nearly constant even for leaks up to 90%.
在手动通气过程中,面罩泄漏是一个常见的问题。我们的目的是研究在使用不同新生儿手动通气设备时,预设泄漏对输送峰值充气压力(PIP)、呼气末正压(PEEP)和潮气量(Vt)的影响。
使用机械控制的自充气球(SIB)和手动 T 型复苏器对新生儿肺模型进行不同呼吸频率(RR,40、60、80/min)通气。四个长度不同的开放式气管,产生高达 90%的泄漏,依次连接在通气设备和肺模型之间。使用气流计测量压力、流量和体积。
随着泄漏的增加(0-90%),两种设备的 PIP 和 PEEP 均显著下降(p < 0.001)。使用 SIB,平均±SD PIP 从 20.1 ± 0.3 降至 15.9 ± 7 cm H2O,PEEP 从 5.0 ± 0 降至 0.3 ± 0.5 cm H2O,导致压力差(Δp)增加;Vt 从 8.8 ± 0.7 增加到 11.1 ± 0.8 ml(p < 0.001)。随着 RR 的增加,泄漏依赖性变化显著降低(p < 0.001)。使用 T 型复苏器,PIP 独立于 RR 从 20.3 ± 0.5 降至 18.5 ± 0.6 cm H2O,PEEP 从 5.1 ± 0.4 降至 4.0 ± 0 cm H2O,而Δp 和 Vt 没有显著差异。
随着泄漏的增加,PIP 和 PEEP 的降低与 RR 有关,使用 SIB 时比使用 T 型设备时明显更高。与 SIB 输送的 Vt 不同,即使泄漏高达 90%,T 型复苏器输送的 Vt 几乎保持不变。