Department of Informatics, University of Bergen, Pb. 7803, N-5020 Bergen, Norway.
Bioinformatics. 2012 Oct 1;28(19):2431-40. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts445. Epub 2012 Jul 12.
The function of a protein depends not only on its structure but also on its dynamics. This is at the basis of a large body of experimental and theoretical work on protein dynamics. Further insight into the dynamics-function relationship can be gained by studying the evolutionary divergence of protein motions. To investigate this, we need appropriate comparative dynamics methods. The most used dynamical similarity score is the correlation between the root mean square fluctuations (RMSF) of aligned residues. Despite its usefulness, RMSF is in general less evolutionarily conserved than the native structure. A fundamental issue is whether RMSF is not as conserved as structure because dynamics is less conserved or because RMSF is not the best property to use to study its conservation.
We performed a systematic assessment of several scores that quantify the (dis)similarity between protein fluctuation patterns. We show that the best scores perform as well as or better than structural dissimilarity, as assessed by their consistency with the SCOP classification. We conclude that to uncover the full extent of the evolutionary conservation of protein fluctuation patterns, it is important to measure the directions of fluctuations and their correlations between sites.
Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics Online.
蛋白质的功能不仅取决于其结构,还取决于其动力学。这是大量关于蛋白质动力学的实验和理论工作的基础。通过研究蛋白质运动的进化分歧,可以进一步深入了解动力学-功能关系。为了进行研究,我们需要适当的比较动力学方法。最常用的动力学相似性评分是对齐残基的均方根波动 (RMSF) 之间的相关性。尽管它很有用,但 RMSF 通常不如天然结构具有进化保守性。一个基本问题是,RMSF 是否不如结构保守,是因为动力学的保守性较低,还是因为 RMSF 不是研究其保守性的最佳属性。
我们对几种量化蛋白质波动模式(相似性/差异性)的评分进行了系统评估。我们表明,最好的评分与结构差异一样好,甚至更好,这可以通过它们与 SCOP 分类的一致性来评估。我们得出结论,为了揭示蛋白质波动模式的全部进化保守程度,测量波动的方向及其在各位点之间的相关性非常重要。
补充数据可在“Bioinformatics Online”上获取。