Ekström Nils, Schiöler Linus, Svensson Ann-Marie, Eeg-Olofsson Katarina, Miao Jonasson Junmei, Zethelius Björn, Cederholm Jan, Eliasson Björn, Gudbjörnsdottir Soffia
Department of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
BMJ Open. 2012 Jul 13;2(4). doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001076. Print 2012.
To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of metformin use in clinical practice in a large sample of pharmacologically treated patients with type 2 diabetes and different levels of renal function.
Observational study between July 2004 and December 2010, mean follow-up 3.9 years.
Hospital outpatient clinics and primary care in Sweden.
51 675 men and women with type 2 diabetes, registered in the Swedish National Diabetes Register, and on continuous glucose-lowering treatment with oral hypoglycaemic agents (OHAs) or insulin.
Risks of cardiovascular disease (CVD), all-cause mortality and acidosis/serious infection, associated with each treatment regimens, were analysed in all patients and in subgroups with different estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) intervals. Covariance adjustment and propensity scores were used to adjust for several baseline risk factors and characteristics at Cox regression.
Compared with metformin in monotherapy, HRs for fatal/non-fatal CVD and all-cause mortality with all other OHAs combined (approximately 80% sulphonylureas) in monotherapy were 1.02 (95% CI 0.93 to 1.12) and 1.13 (1.01 to 1.27), while 1.18 (1.07 to 1.29) and 1.34 (1.19 to 1.50) with insulin in monotherapy, adjusting using propensity scores. Metformin, compared with any other treatment, showed reduced risks of acidosis/serious infection (adjusted HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.97) and all-cause mortality (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.99), in patients with eGFR 45-60 ml/min/1.73 m(2), and no increased risks of all-cause mortality, acidosis/serious infection or CVD were found in patients with eGFR 30-45 ml/min/1.73 m(2).
Metformin showed lower risk than insulin for CVD and all-cause mortality and slightly lower risk for all-cause mortality compared with other OHA, in these 51 675 patients followed for 4 years. Patients with renal impairment showed no increased risk of CVD, all-cause mortality or acidosis/serious infection. In clinical practice, the benefits of metformin use clearly outbalance the risk of severe side effects.
评估二甲双胍在大量接受药物治疗的2型糖尿病且肾功能水平不同的患者临床实践中的有效性和安全性。
2004年7月至2010年12月的观察性研究,平均随访3.9年。
瑞典的医院门诊和初级保健机构。
51675名2型糖尿病男性和女性,登记在瑞典国家糖尿病登记处,接受口服降糖药(OHAs)或胰岛素的持续降糖治疗。
分析所有患者以及不同估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)区间亚组中,与每种治疗方案相关的心血管疾病(CVD)、全因死亡率和酸中毒/严重感染的风险。在Cox回归中使用协方差调整和倾向评分来调整几个基线风险因素和特征。
与二甲双胍单药治疗相比,使用所有其他OHAs联合治疗(约80%为磺脲类)的单药治疗中,致命/非致命CVD和全因死亡率的HR分别为1.02(95%CI 0.93至1.12)和1.13(1.01至1.27),而胰岛素单药治疗的HR分别为1.18(1.07至1.29)和1.34(1.19至1.50),使用倾向评分进行调整。与任何其他治疗相比,二甲双胍在eGFR为45 - 60 ml/min/1.73m²的患者中,酸中毒/严重感染风险降低(调整后HR 0.85,95%CI 0.74至0.97),全因死亡率降低(HR 0.87,95%CI 0.77至0.99),在eGFR为30 - 45 ml/min/1.73m²的患者中未发现全因死亡率、酸中毒/严重感染或CVD风险增加。
在这51675名随访4年的患者中,二甲双胍在CVD和全因死亡率方面显示出比胰岛素更低的风险,与其他OHAs相比全因死亡率风险略低。肾功能损害患者未显示出CVD、全因死亡率或酸中毒/严重感染风险增加。在临床实践中,使用二甲双胍的益处明显超过严重副作用的风险。