• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项建立中国人正常喉咽 pH 值数据库的研究。

A Study to Draw a Normative Database of Laryngopharynx pH Profile in Chinese.

机构信息

Departments of Gastroenterology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.

Departments of Otorhinolaryngology , Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.

出版信息

J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2014 Jul 31;20(3):347-51. doi: 10.5056/jnm13138.

DOI:10.5056/jnm13138
PMID:24948130
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4102165/
Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To draw a normative database of laryngopharynx pH profile in Chinese subjects.

METHODS

Normal volunteers were recruited from "www.Ganji.com" and People's hospital between May 2008 and December 2009. The Restech pH Probes were calibrated in pH 7 and pH 4 buffer solutions according to the manufacturer's instructions. Each volunteer was asked to wear the device for a 24-hour period and was encouraged to participate in normal daily activities.

RESULTS

The healthy volunteers consisted of 20 males and 9 females with a median age of 23 years (interquartile range, 21 to 32 years). The 95th percentiles for % total times at pH < 4, pH < 4.5, pH < 5.0 and pH < 5.5 for the oropharynx pH catheter were 0.06%, 1.01%, 7.23% and 27.34%, respectively. The 95th percentile for number of reflux events within the 24-hour period at pH < 4, pH < 4.5, pH < 5.0 and pH < 5.5 were 2.0, 18.0, 107.5 and 284.5, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to systematically assess the degree of reflux detected by the new pH probe in healthy asymptomatic Chinese volunteers and to report normative values in Chinese people. Using an oropharyngeal pH catheter to monitor laryngopharyngeal reflux indicated that in healthy Chinese, reflux should be considered normal if the percent time at pH less than 4.5 is no more than 1%.

摘要

背景/目的:绘制中国人喉咽部 pH 曲线的正常参考值数据库。

方法

正常志愿者从“www.Ganji.com”和人民医院招募,时间为 2008 年 5 月至 2009 年 12 月。根据制造商的说明,用 Restech pH 探头在 pH 7 和 pH 4 缓冲液中校准。要求每位志愿者佩戴设备 24 小时,并鼓励其参与正常的日常活动。

结果

健康志愿者包括 20 名男性和 9 名女性,中位数年龄为 23 岁(四分位间距,21 至 32 岁)。口咽 pH 导管的 pH < 4、pH < 4.5、pH < 5.0 和 pH < 5.5 的总时间 95%百分位值分别为 0.06%、1.01%、7.23%和 27.34%。24 小时内 pH < 4、pH < 4.5、pH < 5.0 和 pH < 5.5 的反流事件数 95%百分位值分别为 2.0、18.0、107.5 和 284.5。

结论

这是第一项系统评估新 pH 探头在无症状健康中国志愿者中检测到的反流程度并报告中国人正常值的研究。使用咽 pH 导管监测喉咽反流,如果 pH < 4.5 的时间百分比不超过 1%,则可认为反流是正常的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/675e/4102165/a6a0b19d2b3f/jnm-20-347f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/675e/4102165/0a90135462b3/jnm-20-347f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/675e/4102165/a6a0b19d2b3f/jnm-20-347f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/675e/4102165/0a90135462b3/jnm-20-347f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/675e/4102165/a6a0b19d2b3f/jnm-20-347f2.jpg

相似文献

1
A Study to Draw a Normative Database of Laryngopharynx pH Profile in Chinese.一项建立中国人正常喉咽 pH 值数据库的研究。
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2014 Jul 31;20(3):347-51. doi: 10.5056/jnm13138.
2
A new pH catheter for laryngopharyngeal reflux: Normal values.一种用于喉咽反流的新型pH导管:正常值
Laryngoscope. 2009 Aug;119(8):1639-43. doi: 10.1002/lary.20282.
3
Study on laryngopharyngeal and esophageal reflux characteristics using 24-h multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring in healthy volunteers.健康志愿者 24 小时多通道腔内阻抗-pH 监测研究胃食管和喉咽反流特征。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Oct;277(10):2801-2811. doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-05969-x. Epub 2020 May 9.
4
Twenty-four-hour esophageal impedance-pH monitoring in healthy preterm neonates: rate and characteristics of acid, weakly acidic, and weakly alkaline gastroesophageal reflux.健康早产儿24小时食管阻抗-pH监测:酸、弱酸性和弱碱性胃食管反流的发生率及特征
Pediatrics. 2006 Aug;118(2):e299-308. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-3140. Epub 2006 Jul 10.
5
Simultaneous laryngopharyngeal pH monitoring (Restech) and conventional esophageal pH monitoring-correlation using a large patient cohort of more than 100 patients with suspected gastroesophageal reflux disease.使用超过100例疑似胃食管反流病患者的大型队列进行同步咽喉部pH监测(Restech)与传统食管pH监测的相关性研究。
Dis Esophagus. 2018 Oct 1;31(10). doi: 10.1093/dote/doy018.
6
Liquid-containing Refluxes and Acid Refluxes May Be Less Frequent in the Japanese Population Than in Other Populations: Normal Values of 24- hour Esophageal Impedance and pH Monitoring.与其他人群相比,含液体反流和酸反流在日本人群中可能不太常见:24小时食管阻抗和pH监测的正常值。
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016 Oct 30;22(4):620-629. doi: 10.5056/jnm15195.
7
The proximal probe in esophageal pH monitoring: development of a normative database.食管pH监测中的近端探头:一个标准数据库的建立
J Voice. 2000 Jun;14(2):247-54. doi: 10.1016/s0892-1997(00)80033-8.
8
Abilities of Oropharyngeal pH Tests and Salivary Pepsin Analysis to Discriminate Between Asymptomatic Volunteers and Subjects With Symptoms of Laryngeal Irritation.口咽pH测试和唾液胃蛋白酶分析鉴别无症状志愿者与有喉部刺激症状受试者的能力。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Apr;14(4):535-542.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.11.017. Epub 2015 Dec 9.
9
Impact of different pH thresholds for 24-hour dual probe pH monitoring in patients with suspected laryngopharyngeal reflux.不同pH阈值对疑似喉咽反流患者进行24小时双探头pH监测的影响
J Laryngol Otol. 2008 May;122(5):485-9. doi: 10.1017/S0022215107008390. Epub 2007 May 23.
10
[Correlation analysis between Dx-pH monitoring and proton pump inhibitor test in the diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease].[Dx-pH监测与质子泵抑制剂试验在喉咽反流性疾病诊断中的相关性分析]
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Jan 7;55(1):34-39. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2020.01.007.

引用本文的文献

1
Does hypopharyngeal-esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring for the diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux have to be 24 h?下咽-食管多通道腔内阻抗-pH监测用于诊断喉咽反流时必须是24小时吗?
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Nov;279(11):5323-5329. doi: 10.1007/s00405-022-07554-w. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
2
Clinical Update Findings about pH-Impedance Monitoring Features in Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Patients.喉咽反流患者pH阻抗监测特征的临床最新研究结果
J Clin Med. 2022 Jun 1;11(11):3158. doi: 10.3390/jcm11113158.
3
Poor consistency between reflux symptom index and laryngopharyngeal pH monitoring in laryngopharyngeal reflux diagnosis in Chinese population.

本文引用的文献

1
Relationship among symptoms, mucosal injury, and acid exposure in gastroesophageal reflux disease.胃食管反流病中的症状、黏膜损伤和酸暴露之间的关系。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2013 Dec;126(23):4430-4.
2
Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of gastroesophageal reflux disease.胃食管反流病诊断和管理指南
Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Mar;108(3):308-28; quiz 329. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.444. Epub 2013 Feb 19.
3
[Clinical research of 24-hour double-probe pH-metry in the laryngopharyngeal reflux diseases].喉咽反流疾病24小时双探头pH测量的临床研究
在中国人群中,反流症状指数与喉咽pH监测在喉咽反流诊断中的一致性较差。
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Jan;9(1):25. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-4783.
4
Esophageal Impedance-pH Monitoring and Pharyngeal pH Monitoring in the Diagnosis of Extraesophageal Reflux in Children.食管阻抗-pH监测与咽部pH监测在儿童食管外反流诊断中的应用
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2019 Mar 3;2019:6271910. doi: 10.1155/2019/6271910. eCollection 2019.
5
Acidic Pharyngeal Reflux Does Not Correlate with Symptoms and Laryngeal Injury Attributed to Laryngopharyngeal Reflux.酸性咽回流与喉咽反流引起的症状和喉损伤不相关。
Dig Dis Sci. 2019 May;64(5):1270-1280. doi: 10.1007/s10620-018-5372-1. Epub 2018 Nov 14.
6
Sex and Gender Differences in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.胃食管反流病中的性别差异
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016 Oct 30;22(4):575-588. doi: 10.5056/jnm16138.
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2012 Apr;47(4):320-3.
4
[Symptom-based relationship between gastroesophageal reflux disease and laryngopharyngeal reflux disease].基于症状的胃食管反流病与喉咽反流病之间的关系
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2011 Sep 20;91(35):2472-5.
5
Gastroesophageal and laryngopharyngeal reflux detected by 24-hour combined impedance and pH monitoring in healthy Chinese volunteers.24 小时联合阻抗和 pH 监测在健康中国志愿者中胃食管和喉咽反流的检测。
J Dig Dis. 2011 Jun;12(3):173-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-2980.2011.00502.x.
6
Epidemiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease in Asia: a systematic review.亚洲胃食管反流病的流行病学:系统评价。
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2011 Jan;17(1):14-27. doi: 10.5056/jnm.2011.17.1.14. Epub 2011 Jan 26.
7
Heterotopic gastric mucosal patch of the esophagus is associated with higher prevalence of laryngopharyngeal reflux symptoms.食管异位胃黏膜斑与咽喉反流症状的更高患病率相关。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2010 Nov;267(11):1793-9. doi: 10.1007/s00405-010-1259-2. Epub 2010 May 1.
8
Laryngopharyngeal reflux is not always secondary to gastroesophageal reflux.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2010 Feb;267(2):321-2. doi: 10.1007/s00405-009-1137-y.
9
Heterotopic gastric mucosal patch in patients with reflux laryngitis: an entity of clinical interest?反流性喉炎患者的异位胃黏膜斑:一个具有临床意义的实体?
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2009 Oct;19(5):361-3. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3181bae1be.
10
A new pH catheter for laryngopharyngeal reflux: Normal values.一种用于喉咽反流的新型pH导管:正常值
Laryngoscope. 2009 Aug;119(8):1639-43. doi: 10.1002/lary.20282.