• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

动机不足的解释:比较自我评价和解释接收者知识意识的作用。

Motivated shortcomings in explanation: the role of comparative self-evaluation and awareness of explanation recipient's knowledge.

机构信息

Knowledge Media Research Center, Tübingen, Germany.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Gen. 2013 May;142(2):445-57. doi: 10.1037/a0029339. Epub 2012 Jul 16.

DOI:10.1037/a0029339
PMID:22800443
Abstract

Being aware of someone else's existing knowledge is a prerequisite to effectively adapting an explanation to that person's learning needs. However, such knowledge awareness introduces the potential for motivated self-evaluation based on relative knowledge, that is, for social comparison. Because favorable social comparisons are actively defended, we propose that knowledge awareness might undermine information sharing in explanation when social comparison motives are active. We tested this hypothesis in a series of experiments in which participants provided explanations to an ostensible learning partner with or without knowledge awareness. Both dispositionally and situationally motivated social comparison interacted with knowledge awareness to reduce information sharing in explanation. Intriguingly, knowledge awareness uniformly facilitated adaptation of the information that was shared to address partner knowledge deficit. These results illustrate a tension in the components of effective explanation. At the same time that knowledge awareness effectively coordinates explanation content, it can lead to knowledge hoarding by knowledgeable explainers who are motivated to rely on knowledge differences between the self and the explanation recipient for self-evaluation.

摘要

意识到他人已有的知识是将解释有效地调整为适应该人学习需求的前提。然而,这种知识意识会带来基于相对知识的动机性自我评价的可能性,即社会比较。因为有利的社会比较会被积极维护,所以我们提出,当社会比较动机活跃时,知识意识可能会破坏解释中的信息共享。我们在一系列实验中检验了这一假设,在这些实验中,参与者在有或没有知识意识的情况下向一个表面上的学习伙伴提供解释。无论是性格上还是情境上的社会比较动机都与知识意识相互作用,从而减少了解释中的信息共享。有趣的是,知识意识统一地促进了所共享信息的调整,以解决伙伴的知识缺陷。这些结果说明了有效解释的组成部分之间存在紧张关系。与此同时,知识意识可以有效地协调解释内容,但它也可能导致有知识的解释者进行知识囤积,因为他们有动机依赖自我和解释接受者之间的知识差异来进行自我评价。

相似文献

1
Motivated shortcomings in explanation: the role of comparative self-evaluation and awareness of explanation recipient's knowledge.动机不足的解释:比较自我评价和解释接收者知识意识的作用。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2013 May;142(2):445-57. doi: 10.1037/a0029339. Epub 2012 Jul 16.
2
Self-monitoring without awareness: using mimicry as a nonconscious affiliation strategy.无意识的自我监控:将模仿作为一种非意识的归属策略。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Dec;85(6):1170-9. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.6.1170.
3
Learning to lead.学习领导。
Nurs Manag (Harrow). 2006 Feb;12(9):34-7. doi: 10.7748/nm2006.02.12.9.34.c2044.
4
In search of information that confirms a desired self-perception: motivated processing of social feedback and choice of social interactions.寻找能够证实理想自我认知的信息:对社会反馈的动机性加工与社会互动的选择
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2004 Apr;30(4):412-22. doi: 10.1177/0146167203261882.
5
Motivated self-stereotyping: heightened assimilation and differentiation needs result in increased levels of positive and negative self-stereotyping.动机性自我刻板印象:增强的同化和分化需求导致积极和消极自我刻板印象水平的提高。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002 Apr;82(4):543-62.
6
Awareness of interpersonal style and self-evaluation.人际风格意识与自我评估。
J Soc Psychol. 1997 Aug;137(4):429-34. doi: 10.1080/00224549709595458.
7
Self-serving interpretations of flattery: why ingratiation works.奉承的利己主义解读:为何逢迎奏效。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002 Apr;82(4):515-26.
8
Explanation and prior knowledge interact to guide learning.解释和先验知识相互作用以指导学习。
Cogn Psychol. 2013 Feb;66(1):55-84. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.09.002. Epub 2012 Oct 23.
9
Motives of the human animal: comprehending, managing, and sharing inner states.人类动物的动机:理解、管理和分享内心状态。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2008;59:361-85. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093726.
10
Personality and persona: personality processes in self-presentation.人格与角色:自我呈现中的人格过程。
J Pers. 2011 Dec;79(6):1191-218. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00704.x. Epub 2011 Oct 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Selecting learning partners: memory for participation and competence.选择学习伙伴:对参与度和能力的记忆。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2025 Aug 3;10(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s41235-025-00656-z.
2
Social comparison effects on students' cognitive anxiety, self-confidence, and performance in Chinese composition writing.社会比较对学生在汉语作文写作中的认知焦虑、自信心和表现的影响。
Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 15;13:1060421. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1060421. eCollection 2022.
3
Personal Competition Among Sports Players and Their Performance as a Team: A Moderated Mediation Model.
运动员个人竞争与其团队表现:一个有调节的中介模型。
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 28;13:862599. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.862599. eCollection 2022.
4
The Cognitive-Affective-Social Theory of Learning in digital Environments (CASTLE).数字环境下学习的认知-情感-社会理论(CASTLE)。
Educ Psychol Rev. 2022;34(1):1-38. doi: 10.1007/s10648-021-09626-5. Epub 2021 Jun 30.
5
Team Sports Off the Field: Competing Excludes Cooperating for Individual but Not for Team Athletes.团队运动赛场之外:竞争排斥个体运动员的合作,但不排斥团队运动员的合作。
Front Psychol. 2019 Nov 5;10:2470. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02470. eCollection 2019.
6
When those who know do share: Group goals facilitate information sharing, but social power does not undermine it.当知情者分享时:群体目标有助于信息共享,但社会权力不会破坏它。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 11;14(3):e0213795. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213795. eCollection 2019.
7
Interactivity: A Potential Determinant of Learning by Preparing to Teach and Teaching.交互性:通过备课和授课进行学习的一个潜在决定因素。
Front Psychol. 2019 Jan 11;9:2755. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02755. eCollection 2018.