• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

选择学习伙伴:对参与度和能力的记忆。

Selecting learning partners: memory for participation and competence.

作者信息

Ülker Oktay, Bodemer Daniel

机构信息

Research Methods in Psychology-Technology, Learning, Collaboration, University of Duisburg-Essen, Lotharstraße 65, 47057, Duisburg, Germany.

出版信息

Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2025 Aug 3;10(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s41235-025-00656-z.

DOI:10.1186/s41235-025-00656-z
PMID:40753515
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12318891/
Abstract

Remembering information about others is important but challenging in various social contexts. For instance, in long-term collaborative educational settings, students often need to choose peers for academic support. In different contexts, the selection process can depend on group awareness, i.e., the state of being informed about relevant social or cognitive characteristics of (potential) learning partners, like their participation or competence. However, selection can also depend on memory for different group awareness information on peers, which is not always accurate. An experimental study (N = 85) examined how type (participation vs. competence) and level (high vs. medium vs. low) of presented group awareness information influence learning partner selection in two phases (when information is present and when it is remembered). Higher levels were associated with higher selection probabilities, regardless of information type. Social comparison tendencies were associated with avoiding low participation partners. Moreover, we analyzed memory for group awareness information with multinomial processing tree model-based analyses: high and low participation levels were remembered better than medium levels, whereas high competence was remembered better than medium and low competence. Findings suggest that learners use different approach and avoidance strategies for choosing learning partners based on the type of given information.

摘要

在各种社交情境中,记住关于他人的信息很重要,但也具有挑战性。例如,在长期的合作教育环境中,学生经常需要选择同伴以获得学业支持。在不同情境下,选择过程可能取决于群体意识,即了解(潜在)学习伙伴的相关社会或认知特征的状态,比如他们的参与度或能力。然而,选择也可能取决于对同伴不同群体意识信息的记忆,而这种记忆并不总是准确的。一项实验研究(N = 85)考察了所呈现的群体意识信息的类型(参与度与能力)和水平(高、中、低)如何在两个阶段(信息呈现时和记忆时)影响学习伙伴的选择。无论信息类型如何,更高的水平都与更高的选择概率相关。社会比较倾向与避免选择参与度低的伙伴有关。此外,我们使用基于多项式加工树模型的分析方法来分析对群体意识信息的记忆:高参与度和低参与度水平比中等水平更容易被记住,而高能力比中等和低能力更容易被记住。研究结果表明,学习者会根据给定信息的类型使用不同的选择和回避策略来选择学习伙伴。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e6b/12318891/ccc140c070e6/41235_2025_656_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e6b/12318891/67cd92999797/41235_2025_656_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e6b/12318891/a5e6da00e2ed/41235_2025_656_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e6b/12318891/9aa6dd5471db/41235_2025_656_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e6b/12318891/ccc140c070e6/41235_2025_656_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e6b/12318891/67cd92999797/41235_2025_656_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e6b/12318891/a5e6da00e2ed/41235_2025_656_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e6b/12318891/9aa6dd5471db/41235_2025_656_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e6b/12318891/ccc140c070e6/41235_2025_656_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Selecting learning partners: memory for participation and competence.选择学习伙伴:对参与度和能力的记忆。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2025 Aug 3;10(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s41235-025-00656-z.
2
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
3
Short-Term Memory Impairment短期记忆障碍
4
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
5
"Just Ask What Support We Need": Autistic Adults' Feedback on Social Skills Training.“只需询问我们需要什么支持”:成年自闭症患者对社交技能培训的反馈
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):283-292. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0136. eCollection 2025 Jun.
6
A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care.一种新的量化社会健康指标与寻求肌肉骨骼专科护理的患者的不适程度、能力以及心理和总体健康水平相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):647-663. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003394. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
7
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.降低男男性行为者中艾滋病毒性传播风险的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.
8
The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11.档案袋对本科学生学习的教育效果:最佳证据医学教育(BEME)系统评价。BEME指南第11号。
Med Teach. 2009 Apr;31(4):282-98. doi: 10.1080/01421590902889897.
9
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
10
Technological aids for the rehabilitation of memory and executive functioning in children and adolescents with acquired brain injury.脑损伤儿童和青少年记忆与执行功能康复的技术辅助手段。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jul 1;7(7):CD011020. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011020.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating the robustness of parameter estimates in cognitive models: A meta-analytic review of multinomial processing tree models across the multiverse of estimation methods.评估认知模型中参数估计的稳健性:跨越多元估计方法的多元处理树模型的荟萃分析综述。
Psychol Bull. 2024 Aug;150(8):965-1003. doi: 10.1037/bul0000434. Epub 2024 Jun 27.
2
Memory as a foundation for approach and avoidance decisions: A fertile area for research.记忆作为趋近与回避决策的基础:一个富有研究潜力的领域。
Mem Cognit. 2025 Feb;53(2):590-605. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01588-7. Epub 2024 Jun 7.
3
How to develop, test, and extend multinomial processing tree models: A tutorial.
如何开发、测试和扩展多项加工树模型:教程
Psychol Methods. 2023 Jul 27. doi: 10.1037/met0000561.
4
Evidence for a memory advantage for prosocial behaviors.亲社会行为的记忆优势的证据。
Brain Behav. 2023 Jul;13(7):e3096. doi: 10.1002/brb3.3096. Epub 2023 Jun 8.
5
The influence of memory on approach and avoidance decisions: Investigating the role of episodic memory in social decision making.记忆对趋近和回避决策的影响:探究情节记忆在社会决策中的作用。
Cognition. 2022 Aug;225:105072. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105072. Epub 2022 Mar 21.
6
Memory as a cognitive requirement for reciprocal cooperation.记忆是互惠合作的认知要求。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2022 Feb;43:271-277. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.08.008. Epub 2021 Aug 16.
7
A novel paradigm to assess storage of sources in memory: the source recognition test with reinstatement.一种新的评估记忆中源存储的范式:再认的源识别测试。
Memory. 2021 Apr;29(4):507-523. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2021.1910310. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
8
Adaptive memory: Source memory is positively associated with adaptive social decision making.适应记忆:源记忆与适应性社会决策呈正相关。
Cognition. 2019 May;186:7-14. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.01.014. Epub 2019 Feb 1.
9
Adaptive Memory: Remembering Potential Mates.适应性记忆:记住潜在配偶。
Evol Psychol. 2017 Oct-Dec;15(4):1474704917742807. doi: 10.1177/1474704917742807.
10
Is he important to me? Source memory advantage for personally relevant cheaters.他对我重要吗?与个人相关的骗子的源记忆优势。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Jun;25(3):1129-1137. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1345-1.