Health Care Management Department, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, 19104, USA.
Am J Kidney Dis. 2012 Oct;60(4):524-9. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2012.05.019. Epub 2012 Jul 15.
The conceptual model for an accountable care organization imagines that care will be rendered to a defined population by an entity that receives bundled payment for that care, coordinates the individual services involved in that care, provides measures of outcomes and quality, and divides the bundled payment among those who supply services. How does this concept differ from earlier efforts, and what, if anything, does it mean for the care of patients with end-stage renal disease? The concept is similar to the largely abandoned integrated delivery networks of the 1990s. The support from Medicare may make a difference, but Medicare's need to constrain spending growth will pose a challenge. Kidney disease care is already much more coordinated than health care for the rest of the population. There are some potential gains from greater coordination, especially with care for comorbid conditions associated with hospitalization. However, economic analysis suggests that the absence of large populations of patients in given geographic sites and the relatively smaller gain from incremental improvements in coordination might mean that the accountable care organization model are not ideal for the dialysis market.
问责制医疗照顾组织的概念模型设想,由一个为该医疗照顾提供捆绑式支付的实体为一个特定人群提供医疗照顾,协调该医疗照顾所涉及的个别服务,提供结果和质量的衡量标准,并在提供服务的人员之间分配捆绑式支付。这一概念与 20 世纪 90 年代的早期努力有何不同,如果对终末期肾病患者的治疗有何不同?这一概念类似于上世纪 90 年代基本被放弃的综合医疗网络。医疗保险的支持可能会有所帮助,但医疗保险控制支出增长的需求将构成挑战。肾脏疾病的治疗已经比其他人群的医疗护理协调得更多。从更大的协调中可能会有一些潜在的收益,特别是在与住院相关的合并症的治疗方面。然而,经济分析表明,在特定地理区域缺乏大量患者人群,以及从协调方面的增量改进中获得的收益相对较小,这可能意味着问责制医疗照顾组织的模式并不适合透析市场。