• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

共病医学患者的抑郁障碍协同照护

Collaborative care for depression in medically ill patients.

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology, University of Freiburg, Germany.

出版信息

Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2012 Sep;25(5):405-14. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0b013e3283556c63.

DOI:10.1097/YCO.0b013e3283556c63
PMID:22801356
Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Depression is common in medically ill patients and associated with a negative prognosis. Recent findings indicate that single interventions have little effect on outcomes in these patients. Alternatively, complex interventions based on a collaborative care model are promising. This review summarizes recent findings regarding collaborative care in medically ill patients with comorbid depression.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent trials provide evidence for a significantly beneficial effect on depression outcomes with moderate effect sizes regarding depressive symptoms [standardized mean differences (SMDs): -0.46 to -0.74, n = 5] and depression response [odds ratios (ORs): 1.29 to 4.75, n = 6]. Psychosocial quality of life (SMDs: 0.09 to 0.54, n = 5) and satisfaction with care (ORs: 2.55-7.43, n = 3; SMDs: 0.05 and 0.2, n = 1) were increased in intervention patients compared with usual care, whereas physical quality of life (SMDs: -0.17 to 0.06) was not. The evidence regarding medication adherence and somatic, disease-specific outcomes is sparse and conclusions cannot be drawn so far.

SUMMARY

Collaborative care interventions are efficacious in medically ill patients with depression. However, there is no data concerning their cost-effectiveness. Furthermore, as trials on collaborative care comprise a heterogeneous set of components, the most effective characteristics should be identified. Moreover, these interventions should be adapted to other healthcare systems than the United States.

摘要

目的综述

患有躯体疾病的患者常并发抑郁,且预后较差。近期研究表明,单一干预措施对这类患者的结局影响甚微,而基于协作式护理模式的综合干预措施则前景广阔。本综述总结了近期关于合并抑郁的躯体疾病患者协作式护理的研究进展。

最近的发现

近期试验为协作式护理对抑郁结局的有益影响提供了证据,其对抑郁症状(标准化均数差:-0.46 至-0.74,n=5)和抑郁反应(比值比:1.29 至 4.75,n=6)的改善效果具有中等效应量。与常规护理相比,心理社会健康相关生活质量(标准化均数差:0.09 至 0.54,n=5)和护理满意度(比值比:2.55 至 7.43,n=3;标准化均数差:0.05 和 0.2,n=1)升高,而躯体健康相关生活质量(标准化均数差:-0.17 至 0.06)则无差异。目前,关于药物依从性和躯体疾病特异性结局的证据还很有限,因此尚无法得出结论。

总结

协作式护理干预对患有抑郁的躯体疾病患者有效。然而,关于其成本效益比,目前尚无数据。此外,由于协作式护理试验包含了各种不同的干预内容,因此应明确最有效的干预特征。另外,还需对这些干预措施进行调整,使其适应除美国以外的其他医疗体系。

相似文献

1
Collaborative care for depression in medically ill patients.共病医学患者的抑郁障碍协同照护
Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2012 Sep;25(5):405-14. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0b013e3283556c63.
2
Recommendation from the community preventive services task force for use of collaborative care for the management of depressive disorders.社区预防服务工作组推荐使用协作式护理管理抑郁障碍。
Am J Prev Med. 2012 May;42(5):521-4. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.01.010.
3
Collaborative care to improve the management of depressive disorders: a community guide systematic review and meta-analysis.协作式护理改善抑郁障碍管理效果的研究:社区指南系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Prev Med. 2012 May;42(5):525-38. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.01.019.
4
Collaborative depression care models: from development to dissemination.协作式抑郁症护理模式:从发展到传播
Am J Prev Med. 2012 May;42(5):550-2. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.01.017.
5
Economics of collaborative care for management of depressive disorders: a community guide systematic review.协作式护理管理抑郁障碍的经济学研究:社区指南系统评价。
Am J Prev Med. 2012 May;42(5):539-49. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.01.011.
6
Cost-effectiveness analysis of a rural telemedicine collaborative care intervention for depression.农村远程医疗协作式抑郁症护理干预的成本效益分析
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2010 Aug;67(8):812-21. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.82.
7
Using evidence-based quality improvement methods for translating depression collaborative care research into practice.运用基于证据的质量改进方法将抑郁症协作护理研究转化为实践。
Fam Syst Health. 2010 Jun;28(2):91-113. doi: 10.1037/a0020302.
8
Systemic organizational change for the collaborative care approach to managing depressive disorders.采用协作护理方法管理抑郁症的系统性组织变革。
Am J Prev Med. 2012 May;42(5):553-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.01.016.
9
Enhanced care for depression.抑郁的强化护理。
Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2013 Jan;26(1):7-12. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0b013e32835b2c8c.
10
Collaborative care models for the treatment of depression. Based on a presentation by Wayne Katon, MD.抑郁症治疗的协作护理模式。基于医学博士韦恩·卡顿的一次演讲。
Am J Manag Care. 1999 Sep;5(13 Suppl):S794-800; discussion S800-10.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of guided Internet- and mobile-based CBT for adolescents and young adults with chronic somatic conditions and comorbid depression and anxiety symptoms (youthCOACH): study protocol for a multicentre randomized controlled trial.基于互联网和移动的认知行为疗法对慢性躯体疾病合并抑郁和焦虑症状的青少年和年轻成人的有效性和成本效益研究(youthCOACH):一项多中心随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2020 Mar 12;21(1):253. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-4041-9.
2
Exploring multi-level system factors facilitating educator training and implementation of evidence-based practices (EBP): a study protocol.探索促进教育者培训和实施循证实践(EBP)的多层次系统因素:研究方案。
Implement Sci. 2018 Jan 8;13(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0698-1.
3
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a guided internet- and mobile-based depression intervention for individuals with chronic back pain: protocol of a multi-centre randomised controlled trial.一项针对慢性背痛患者的基于互联网和移动设备的抑郁症引导干预措施的有效性和成本效益:一项多中心随机对照试验方案
BMJ Open. 2017 Dec 28;7(12):e015226. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015226.
4
Cost-utility of collaborative care for the treatment of comorbid major depressive disorder in outpatients with chronic physical conditions. A randomized controlled trial in the general hospital setting (CC-DIM).协作式照护对合并重度抑郁症的慢性躯体疾病门诊患者的成本效益。一项综合医院环境下的随机对照试验(CC-DIM)
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2017 Jul 18;13:1881-1893. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S134008. eCollection 2017.
5
Cost-effectiveness of collaborative care for the treatment of depressive disorders in primary care: a systematic review.基层医疗中协作护理治疗抑郁症的成本效益:一项系统评价。
PLoS One. 2015 May 19;10(5):e0123078. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123078. eCollection 2015.
6
Inpatient and outpatient costs in patients with coronary artery disease and mental disorders: a systematic review.冠心病合并精神障碍患者的住院和门诊费用:一项系统评价
Biopsychosoc Med. 2015 Apr 17;9:11. doi: 10.1186/s13030-015-0039-z. eCollection 2015.
7
Collaborative care for the treatment of comorbid depression and coronary heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.合并抑郁症和冠心病的协同治疗:一项系统评价与荟萃分析方案
Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 28;3:127. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-3-127.
8
The Impact of an Early Eclectic Rehabilitative Intervention on Symptoms in First Episode Depression among Employed People.早期综合康复干预对在职人群首次发作抑郁症症状的影响
Depress Res Treat. 2013;2013:926562. doi: 10.1155/2013/926562. Epub 2013 Nov 10.
9
Clinical impact of the temporal relationship between depression and type 2 diabetes: the Fremantle diabetes study phase II.抑郁症与 2 型糖尿病之间时间关系的临床影响:弗里曼特尔糖尿病研究二期。
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 4;8(12):e81254. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081254. eCollection 2013.
10
Mental health collaborative care and its role in primary care settings.心理健康协作式照护及其在初级保健环境中的作用。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2013 Aug;15(8):383. doi: 10.1007/s11920-013-0383-2.