• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Can nonhuman primates use tokens to represent and sum quantities?非人类灵长类动物能使用代币来表征和累加数量吗?
J Comp Psychol. 2010 Nov;124(4):369-80. doi: 10.1037/a0019855.
2
Delaying gratification for food and tokens in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): when quantity is salient, symbolic stimuli do not improve performance.延迟满足对卷尾猴(Cebus apella)和黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)的食物和代币的影响:当数量显著时,符号刺激并不能提高表现。
Anim Cogn. 2012 Jul;15(4):539-48. doi: 10.1007/s10071-012-0482-1. Epub 2012 Mar 21.
3
Do capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) use tokens as symbols?卷尾猴(白喉卷尾猴)会将代币用作符号吗?
Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Oct 22;274(1625):2579-85. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2007.0726.
4
Numerical judgments by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) in a token economy.黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)在代币经济中的数字判断。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2011 Apr;37(2):165-74. doi: 10.1037/a0021472.
5
Do primates see the solitaire illusion differently? A comparative assessment of humans (Homo sapiens), chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta), and capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).灵长类动物对单人纸牌幻觉的看法是否不同?对人类(智人)、黑猩猩(黑猩猩)、恒河猴(猕猴)和卷尾猴(卷尾猴)的比较评估。
J Comp Psychol. 2014 Nov;128(4):402-13. doi: 10.1037/a0037499. Epub 2014 Aug 18.
6
Food and token quantity discrimination in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).卷尾猴(僧帽猴)对食物和代币数量的辨别
Anim Cogn. 2008 Apr;11(2):275-82. doi: 10.1007/s10071-007-0111-6. Epub 2007 Sep 28.
7
A concept of value during experimental exchange in brown capuchin monkeys, Cebus apella.棕色卷尾猴(僧帽卷尾猴)实验性交换过程中的价值概念。
Folia Primatol (Basel). 2004 Sep-Oct;75(5):317-30. doi: 10.1159/000080209.
8
Quantity judgments of sequentially presented food items by capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).卷尾猴(僧帽猴)对依次呈现的食物项目的数量判断
Anim Cogn. 2009 Jan;12(1):97-105. doi: 10.1007/s10071-008-0174-z. Epub 2008 Aug 1.
9
Tokens improve capuchin performance in the reverse-reward contingency task.代币提高了卷尾猴在反向奖励任务中的表现。
Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Mar 22;278(1707):849-54. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.1602. Epub 2010 Sep 22.
10
Preference transitivity and symbolic representation in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).卷尾猴(僧帽猴)的偏好传递性和符号表征
PLoS One. 2008 Jun 11;3(6):e2414. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002414.

引用本文的文献

1
Maze runners: monkeys show restricted Arabic numeral summation during computerized two-arm maze performance.《迷宫行者:猴子在计算机化双臂迷宫任务中表现出受限的阿拉伯数字求和能力》
Anim Cogn. 2024 Mar 6;27(1):23. doi: 10.1007/s10071-024-01853-x.
2
Comparative economics: how studying other primates helps us better understand the evolution of our own economic decision making.比较经济学:研究其他灵长类动物如何帮助我们更好地理解人类自身经济决策的演变。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023 May 8;378(1876):20210497. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0497. Epub 2023 Mar 20.
3
Non-human primate token use shows possibilities but also limitations for establishing a form of currency.非人类灵长类动物的代币使用为建立某种形式的货币提供了可能性,但也存在局限性。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Mar;376(1819):20190675. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0675. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
4
Quantity-quality trade-off in the acquisition of token preference by capuchin monkeys ( spp.).通过卷尾猴( spp.)获得代币偏好的数量-质量权衡。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Mar;376(1819):20190662. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0662. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
5
Macaque monkeys can learn token values from human models through vicarious reward.猕猴可以通过间接奖励从人类模型中学习符号价值。
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e59961. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059961. Epub 2013 Mar 27.
6
Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) transfer tokens repeatedly with a partner to accumulate rewards in a self-control task.黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)在自我控制任务中与同伴反复传递代币以积累奖励。
Anim Cogn. 2013 Jul;16(4):627-36. doi: 10.1007/s10071-013-0599-x. Epub 2013 Feb 5.
7
Adult cleaner wrasse outperform capuchin monkeys, chimpanzees and orang-utans in a complex foraging task derived from cleaner--client reef fish cooperation.在一项源自清洁鱼-客户礁鱼合作的复杂觅食任务中,成年清洁濑鱼在表现上优于卷尾猴、黑猩猩和猩猩。
PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e49068. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049068. Epub 2012 Nov 21.
8
Sequential responding and planning in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).卷尾猴(Cebus apella)的连续反应和计划。
Anim Cogn. 2012 Nov;15(6):1085-94. doi: 10.1007/s10071-012-0532-8. Epub 2012 Jul 17.
9
Language-trained chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) delay gratification by choosing token exchange over immediate reward consumption.经过语言训练的黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)会选择代币兑换而不是立即奖励消费,从而延迟满足。
Am J Primatol. 2012 Sep;74(9):864-70. doi: 10.1002/ajp.22042. Epub 2012 Jun 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Token-mediated tool-use by a tufted capuchin monkey (Cebus apella).丛冠卷尾猴(Cebus apella)通过代币介导使用工具。
Anim Cogn. 1998 Oct;1(2):101-6. doi: 10.1007/s100710050014. Epub 2014 Jan 5.
2
Perception of food amounts by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): the role of magnitude, contiguity, and wholeness.黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)对食物量的感知:数量、连续性和整体性的作用。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2009 Oct;35(4):516-24. doi: 10.1037/a0015488.
3
Trading behavior between conspecifics in chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes.黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)种内个体间的交易行为。
J Comp Psychol. 2009 May;123(2):181-94. doi: 10.1037/a0015092.
4
Perception of Food Amounts by Chimpanzees Based on the Number, Size, Contour Length and Visibility of Items.黑猩猩基于物品数量、大小、轮廓长度和可见性对食物量的感知
Anim Behav. 2008 May;75(5):1793-1802. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.10.035.
5
Its own reward: lessons to be drawn from the reversed-reward contingency paradigm.其自身的回报:从反向奖励意外情况范式中吸取的教训。
Anim Cogn. 2009 Jul;12(4):547-58. doi: 10.1007/s10071-009-0215-2. Epub 2009 Feb 11.
6
Endowment effect in capuchin monkeys.卷尾猴的禀赋效应
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008 Dec 12;363(1511):3837-44. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0149.
7
Tracking and inferring spatial rotation by children and great apes.儿童和大猩猩对空间旋转的追踪与推断
Dev Psychol. 2008 Sep;44(5):1396-408. doi: 10.1037/a0012594.
8
Quantity judgments of sequentially presented food items by capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).卷尾猴(僧帽猴)对依次呈现的食物项目的数量判断
Anim Cogn. 2009 Jan;12(1):97-105. doi: 10.1007/s10071-008-0174-z. Epub 2008 Aug 1.
9
Preference transitivity and symbolic representation in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).卷尾猴(僧帽猴)的偏好传递性和符号表征
PLoS One. 2008 Jun 11;3(6):e2414. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002414.
10
Ordinal judgments of symbolic stimuli by capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) and rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta): the effects of differential and nondifferential reward.卷尾猴(僧帽猴属)和恒河猴(猕猴属)对符号刺激的顺序判断:差异奖励和非差异奖励的影响。
J Comp Psychol. 2008 Feb;122(1):52-61. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.122.1.52.

非人类灵长类动物能使用代币来表征和累加数量吗?

Can nonhuman primates use tokens to represent and sum quantities?

作者信息

Evans Theodore A, Beran Michael J, Addessi Elsa

机构信息

Language Research Center, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30302-5010,

出版信息

J Comp Psychol. 2010 Nov;124(4):369-80. doi: 10.1037/a0019855.

DOI:10.1037/a0019855
PMID:20836596
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5152591/
Abstract

It is unclear whether nonhuman animals can use physical tokens to flexibly represent various quantities by combining token values. Previous studies showed that chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and a macaque (Macaca mulatta) were only partly successful in tests involving sets of different-looking food containers representing different food quantities, while some capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) have shown greater success in tests involving sets of various concrete objects representing different food quantities. Some of the discrepancy in results between these studies may be attributed to the different methods used. In an effort to reconcile these discrepancies, we presented two primates species, chimpanzees and capuchin monkeys, with two token tasks. The critical test in each task involved summing the value of multiple tokens of different types to make accurate quantity judgments. We found that, using either method, individuals of both species learned to associate individual tokens with specific quantities, as well as successfully compare individual tokens to one another or to sets of visible food items. However, regardless of method, only a few individuals exhibited the capacity to sum multiple tokens of different types and then use those summed values to make an optimal response. This suggests that flexible combination of symbolic stimuli in quantity judgments tasks is within the abilities of chimpanzees and capuchins but does not characterize the majority of individuals. Furthermore, the results suggest the need to carefully examine specific methodological details that may promote or hinder such possible representation.

摘要

尚不清楚非人类动物是否能够通过组合代币值,使用实物代币灵活地表示各种数量。先前的研究表明,黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)和一只猕猴(Macaca mulatta)在涉及代表不同食物数量的外观不同的食物容器组的测试中仅部分成功,而一些卷尾猴(Cebus apella)在涉及代表不同食物数量的各种具体物体组的测试中表现出更大的成功。这些研究结果之间的一些差异可能归因于所使用的不同方法。为了调和这些差异,我们向两种灵长类动物——黑猩猩和卷尾猴——呈现了两个代币任务。每个任务中的关键测试都涉及对不同类型的多个代币的值进行求和,以做出准确的数量判断。我们发现,无论使用哪种方法,两个物种的个体都学会了将单个代币与特定数量相关联,并且成功地相互比较单个代币或与可见食物项目组进行比较。然而,无论采用哪种方法,只有少数个体表现出能够对不同类型的多个代币进行求和,然后使用这些求和值做出最佳反应的能力。这表明在数量判断任务中对符号刺激进行灵活组合在黑猩猩和卷尾猴的能力范围内,但并非大多数个体的特征。此外,结果表明需要仔细研究可能促进或阻碍这种可能表征的具体方法细节。