Evans Theodore A, Beran Michael J, Addessi Elsa
Language Research Center, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30302-5010,
J Comp Psychol. 2010 Nov;124(4):369-80. doi: 10.1037/a0019855.
It is unclear whether nonhuman animals can use physical tokens to flexibly represent various quantities by combining token values. Previous studies showed that chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and a macaque (Macaca mulatta) were only partly successful in tests involving sets of different-looking food containers representing different food quantities, while some capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) have shown greater success in tests involving sets of various concrete objects representing different food quantities. Some of the discrepancy in results between these studies may be attributed to the different methods used. In an effort to reconcile these discrepancies, we presented two primates species, chimpanzees and capuchin monkeys, with two token tasks. The critical test in each task involved summing the value of multiple tokens of different types to make accurate quantity judgments. We found that, using either method, individuals of both species learned to associate individual tokens with specific quantities, as well as successfully compare individual tokens to one another or to sets of visible food items. However, regardless of method, only a few individuals exhibited the capacity to sum multiple tokens of different types and then use those summed values to make an optimal response. This suggests that flexible combination of symbolic stimuli in quantity judgments tasks is within the abilities of chimpanzees and capuchins but does not characterize the majority of individuals. Furthermore, the results suggest the need to carefully examine specific methodological details that may promote or hinder such possible representation.
尚不清楚非人类动物是否能够通过组合代币值,使用实物代币灵活地表示各种数量。先前的研究表明,黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)和一只猕猴(Macaca mulatta)在涉及代表不同食物数量的外观不同的食物容器组的测试中仅部分成功,而一些卷尾猴(Cebus apella)在涉及代表不同食物数量的各种具体物体组的测试中表现出更大的成功。这些研究结果之间的一些差异可能归因于所使用的不同方法。为了调和这些差异,我们向两种灵长类动物——黑猩猩和卷尾猴——呈现了两个代币任务。每个任务中的关键测试都涉及对不同类型的多个代币的值进行求和,以做出准确的数量判断。我们发现,无论使用哪种方法,两个物种的个体都学会了将单个代币与特定数量相关联,并且成功地相互比较单个代币或与可见食物项目组进行比较。然而,无论采用哪种方法,只有少数个体表现出能够对不同类型的多个代币进行求和,然后使用这些求和值做出最佳反应的能力。这表明在数量判断任务中对符号刺激进行灵活组合在黑猩猩和卷尾猴的能力范围内,但并非大多数个体的特征。此外,结果表明需要仔细研究可能促进或阻碍这种可能表征的具体方法细节。