Shi Fangling, Wu Shiyuan, Cai Wei, Zhao Youming
Department of Orthopaedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China; The Second School of Medicine, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.
The Second School of Medicine, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Foot Ankle Surg. 2021 Jul;27(5):468-479. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2020.07.004. Epub 2020 Jul 18.
The choice of the best therapeutic regimen for Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture (AATR) remains controversial. Our study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of therapeutic regimens in AATR patients using a network meta-analysis of data from clinical randomized controlled trials.
MATERIAL/METHODS: The studies were abstracted from Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Google Scholar and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. RCTs meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria were selected. Statistical analyses were conducted using Stata software, version 14.0 (Stata Corporation, College Station, Texas, USA).
38 randomized controlled trials involving 2480 participants were included. The studies were published between 1981 and 2019. A total of 6 therapeutic regimens -open repair (OR), minimally invasive repair (MIR) and nonoperative treatment (non) combined with traditional standard rehabilitation (TSR) and accelerated functional rehabilitation (AFR) - were included in the literature. The treatments were ranked based on the Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking Curve (SUCRA) probability. In terms of the re-rupture rate, the therapeutic regimens were ranked as follows: OR&AFR, OR&TSR, MIR&AFR, MIR&TSR, nonoperative treatment &AFR and nonoperative treatment &TSR. In terms of the wound-related complication, the therapeutic regimens were ranked as follows: MIR&AFR, nonoperative treatment &AFR, MIR&TSR, nonoperative treatment &TSR, OR&AFR and OR&TSR. In terms of the sural nerve injury, the therapeutic regimens were ranked as follows: non, OR and MIR. In terms of the deep venous thrombosis, the therapeutic regimens were ranked as follows: MIR&AFR, OR&AFR, nonoperative treatment &AFR, OR&TSR, MIR&TSR and nonoperative treatment &TSR. In terms of the returning back to sport, the therapeutic regimens were ranked as follows: MIR&TSR, OR&AFR, OR&TSR, nonoperative treatment &AFR, nonoperative treatment &TSR and MIR&AFR.
MIR can repair the ruptured Achilles tendon and narrow the tendon gap with low risk of complications. AFR is superior to TSR without increasing the risk of rerupture. MIR&AFR is the best therapeutic regime for AATR. More RCTs focused on AATR are needed to further indicate this conclusion.
急性跟腱断裂(AATR)最佳治疗方案的选择仍存在争议。我们的研究旨在通过对临床随机对照试验数据进行网状Meta分析,评估AATR患者治疗方案的疗效和安全性。
材料/方法:从Medline、Embase、Web of Science、谷歌学术和Cochrane对照试验中央注册库中提取研究。选择符合纳入和排除标准的随机对照试验。使用Stata软件14.0版(美国德克萨斯州大学城的Stata公司)进行统计分析。
纳入38项涉及2480名参与者的随机对照试验。这些研究发表于1981年至2019年之间。文献中共纳入6种治疗方案——开放修复(OR)、微创修复(MIR)以及非手术治疗(non)分别联合传统标准康复(TSR)和加速功能康复(AFR)。根据累积排序曲线下面积(SUCRA)概率对治疗方法进行排序。就再断裂率而言,治疗方案排序如下:OR&AFR、OR&TSR、MIR&AFR、MIR&TSR、非手术治疗&AFR和非手术治疗&TSR。就伤口相关并发症而言,治疗方案排序如下:MIR&AFR、非手术治疗&AFR、MIR&TSR、非手术治疗&TSR、OR&AFR和OR&TSR。就腓肠神经损伤而言,治疗方案排序如下:non、OR和MIR。就深静脉血栓形成而言,治疗方案排序如下:MIR&AFR、OR&AFR、非手术治疗&AFR、OR&TSR、MIR&TSR和非手术治疗&TSR。就恢复运动而言,治疗方案排序如下:MIR&TSR、OR&AFR、OR&TSR、非手术治疗&AFR、非手术治疗&TSR和MIR&AFR。
微创修复能够修复断裂的跟腱并缩小肌腱间隙,并发症风险较低。加速功能康复在不增加再断裂风险的情况下优于传统标准康复。微创修复联合加速功能康复是急性跟腱断裂的最佳治疗方案。需要更多关注急性跟腱断裂的随机对照试验来进一步证实这一结论。