• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用自动项目生成技术来创建多项选择题测试项目。

Using automatic item generation to create multiple-choice test items.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

Med Educ. 2012 Aug;46(8):757-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04289.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04289.x
PMID:22803753
Abstract

CONTEXT

Many tests of medical knowledge, from the undergraduate level to the level of certification and licensure, contain multiple-choice items. Although these are efficient in measuring examinees' knowledge and skills across diverse content areas, multiple-choice items are time-consuming and expensive to create. Changes in student assessment brought about by new forms of computer-based testing have created the demand for large numbers of multiple-choice items. Our current approaches to item development cannot meet this demand.

METHODS

We present a methodology for developing multiple-choice items based on automatic item generation (AIG) concepts and procedures. We describe a three-stage approach to AIG and we illustrate this approach by generating multiple-choice items for a medical licensure test in the content area of surgery.

RESULTS

To generate multiple-choice items, our method requires a three-stage process. Firstly, a cognitive model is created by content specialists. Secondly, item models are developed using the content from the cognitive model. Thirdly, items are generated from the item models using computer software. Using this methodology, we generated 1248 multiple-choice items from one item model.

CONCLUSIONS

Automatic item generation is a process that involves using models to generate items using computer technology. With our method, content specialists identify and structure the content for the test items, and computer technology systematically combines the content to generate new test items. By combining these outcomes, items can be generated automatically.

摘要

背景

从本科到认证和许可考试的医学知识测试中,都包含多项选择题。尽管这些测试在不同的内容领域中高效地衡量了考生的知识和技能,但多项选择题的创建既耗时又昂贵。新形式的计算机化测试对学生评估的改变,导致了对大量多项选择题的需求。我们目前的项目开发方法无法满足这一需求。

方法

我们提出了一种基于自动项目生成(AIG)概念和程序的多项选择题开发方法。我们描述了一种三阶段的 AIG 方法,并通过在手术内容领域的医学许可考试中生成多项选择题来说明这种方法。

结果

为了生成多项选择题,我们的方法需要经过三个阶段。首先,由内容专家创建认知模型。其次,使用认知模型中的内容开发项目模型。最后,使用计算机软件从项目模型中生成项目。使用这种方法,我们从一个项目模型中生成了 1248 道多项选择题。

结论

自动项目生成是一个使用模型通过计算机技术生成项目的过程。在我们的方法中,内容专家确定并构建测试项目的内容,而计算机技术则系统地组合内容以生成新的测试项目。通过结合这些结果,可以自动生成项目。

相似文献

1
Using automatic item generation to create multiple-choice test items.使用自动项目生成技术来创建多项选择题测试项目。
Med Educ. 2012 Aug;46(8):757-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04289.x.
2
Evaluating the quality of medical multiple-choice items created with automated processes.评估使用自动化流程创建的医学多项选择题的质量。
Med Educ. 2013 Jul;47(7):726-33. doi: 10.1111/medu.12202.
3
Using Automatic Item Generation to Improve the Quality of MCQ Distractors.使用自动试题生成来提高多项选择题干扰项的质量。
Teach Learn Med. 2016;28(2):166-73. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2016.1146608.
4
Three Modeling Applications to Promote Automatic Item Generation for Examinations in Dentistry.三种用于促进牙科考试自动试题生成的建模应用。
J Dent Educ. 2016 Mar;80(3):339-47.
5
Using cognitive models to develop quality multiple-choice questions.运用认知模型来编制高质量的多项选择题。
Med Teach. 2016 Aug;38(8):838-43. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2016.1150989. Epub 2016 Mar 21.
6
A suggestive approach for assessing item quality, usability and validity of Automatic Item Generation.自动出题的项目质量、可用性和有效性评估的一种提示方法。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2023 Dec;28(5):1441-1465. doi: 10.1007/s10459-023-10225-y. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
7
Using Automatic Item Generation to Create Multiple-Choice Questions for Pharmacy Assessment.使用自动项目生成技术为药剂学评估创建多项选择题。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2023 Oct;87(10):100081. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpe.2023.100081. Epub 2023 May 10.
8
Three Sources of Validation Evidence Needed to Evaluate the Quality of Generated Test Items for Medical Licensure.评估用于医疗许可考试的生成试题质量需要三种验证证据来源。
Teach Learn Med. 2024 Jan-Mar;36(1):72-82. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2022.2119569. Epub 2022 Sep 14.
9
The effects of violating standard item writing principles on tests and students: the consequences of using flawed test items on achievement examinations in medical education.违反标准试题编写原则对考试及学生的影响:医学教育中使用有缺陷的试题对成绩考试的后果。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2005;10(2):133-43. doi: 10.1007/s10459-004-4019-5.
10
Comparing narrative and multiple-choice formats in online communication skill assessment.在线沟通技巧评估中比较叙事和多项选择格式。
Med Educ. 2009 Jun;43(6):533-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03368.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Automatic- and Transformer-Based Automatic Item Generation: A Critical Review.基于自动和Transformer的自动试题生成:批判性综述
J Intell. 2025 Aug 12;13(8):102. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence13080102.
2
Pilot Study on Using Large Language Models for Educational Resource Development in Japanese Radiological Technologist Exams.利用大语言模型进行日本放射技师考试教育资源开发的初步研究。
Med Sci Educ. 2025 Jan 18;35(2):919-927. doi: 10.1007/s40670-024-02251-1. eCollection 2025 Apr.
3
Using a Hybrid of AI and Template-Based Method in Automatic Item Generation to Create Multiple-Choice Questions in Medical Education: Hybrid AIG.
在医学教育中运用人工智能与基于模板的方法相结合的混合方式进行自动试题生成以创建多项选择题:混合式自动试题生成
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Apr 4;9:e65726. doi: 10.2196/65726.
4
Optimizing a national examination for medical undergraduates via modern automated test assembly approaches.通过现代自动化测试组装方法优化全国医学生考试。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Aug 25;24(1):919. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05905-1.
5
Large language models for generating medical examinations: systematic review.生成医学检查的大型语言模型:系统评价。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Mar 29;24(1):354. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05239-y.
6
Using machine learning to improve Q-matrix validation.使用机器学习改进 Q 矩阵验证。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Mar;56(3):1916-1935. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02126-0. Epub 2023 May 25.
7
A suggestive approach for assessing item quality, usability and validity of Automatic Item Generation.自动出题的项目质量、可用性和有效性评估的一种提示方法。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2023 Dec;28(5):1441-1465. doi: 10.1007/s10459-023-10225-y. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
8
Feedback, fairness, and validity: effects of disclosing and reusing multiple-choice questions in medical schools.反馈、公平性和有效性:在医学院校中披露和重用多项选择题的影响。
Med Educ Online. 2023 Dec;28(1):2143298. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2022.2143298.
9
Essential steps in the development, implementation, evaluation and quality assurance of the written part of the Swiss federal licensing examination for human medicine.瑞士联邦人用药物许可考试书面部分的开发、实施、评估和质量保证的基本步骤。
GMS J Med Educ. 2022 Sep 15;39(4):Doc43. doi: 10.3205/zma001564. eCollection 2022.
10
Feasibility assurance: a review of automatic item generation in medical assessment.可行性保证:医学评估中自动项目生成的回顾。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2022 May;27(2):405-425. doi: 10.1007/s10459-022-10092-z. Epub 2022 Mar 1.