Social and Community Health, School of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
J Marital Fam Ther. 2012 Jul;38(3):458-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.2012.00320.x. Epub 2012 Jul 2.
Practitioners who view intimate partner violence as a set of strategies aimed at maintaining positions of power and privilege often face an engagement dilemma when men at their first contact talk of themselves as disempowered by circumstances such as separation, loss of access to children, legal problems, substance abuse issues, and their own history of being abused. This paper explores how a language-oriented approach to violence can assist practitioners in responding to abuser's current perceptions while avoiding collusion with justifications for violence. It examines common ways of speaking that men will employ to justify their violence then explores practical ways to identify and neutralized these messages before exploring personal opportunities for change.
当从业者将亲密伴侣暴力视为一系列旨在维护权力和特权的策略时，他们在首次接触到将自己描述为因分居、失去子女探视权、法律问题、药物滥用问题以及自身被虐待史等情况而失去权力的男性时，往往会面临一个参与困境。本文探讨了一种面向语言的暴力处理方法如何帮助从业者应对施虐者当前的认知，同时避免共谋暴力的正当化。它检查了男性用来为自己的暴力行为辩护的常见说法，然后探讨了在探讨个人变革机会之前，识别和消除这些信息的实际方法。
