• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为什么驾驶员在雾天保持较小的车头间距?一项驾驶模拟器研究评估了在自动驾驶和手动跟车过程中风险感知和横向控制。

Why do drivers maintain short headways in fog? A driving-simulator study evaluating feeling of risk and lateral control during automated and manual car following.

机构信息

Department of BioMechanical Engineering, Maritime and Materials Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Ergonomics. 2012;55(9):971-85. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2012.691993. Epub 2012 Jul 17.

DOI:10.1080/00140139.2012.691993
PMID:22804738
Abstract

Drivers in fog tend to maintain short headways, but the reasons behind this phenomenon are not well understood. This study evaluated the effect of headway on lateral control and feeling of risk in both foggy and clear conditions. Twenty-seven participants completed four sessions in a driving simulator: clear automated (CA), clear manual (CM), fog automated (FA) and fog manual (FM). In CM and FM, the drivers used the steering wheel, throttle and brake pedals. In CA and FA, a controller regulated the distance to the lead car, and the driver only had to steer. Drivers indicated how much risk they felt on a touchscreen. Consistent with our hypothesis, feeling of risk and steering activity were elevated when the lead car was not visible. These results might explain why drivers adopt short headways in fog. Practitioner Summary: Fog poses a serious road safety hazard. Our driving-simulator study provides the first experimental evidence to explain the role of risk-feeling and lateral control in headway reduction. These results are valuable for devising effective driver assistance and support systems.

摘要

在雾天行驶的司机往往会保持较短的跟车距离,但这种现象背后的原因尚不清楚。本研究评估了在雾天和晴天两种情况下,车间距对横向控制和风险感知的影响。27 名参与者在驾驶模拟器中完成了四个阶段的测试:晴天自动(CA)、晴天手动(CM)、雾天自动(FA)和雾天手动(FM)。在 CM 和 FM 中,驾驶员使用方向盘、油门和刹车踏板。在 CA 和 FA 中,控制器调节与前车的距离,驾驶员只需转向。驾驶员通过触摸屏表示他们感觉到的风险程度。与我们的假设一致,当看不到前车时,风险感知和转向活动会增加。这些结果可能解释了为什么司机在雾天采用较短的跟车距离。

从业者总结

雾对道路安全构成严重威胁。我们的驾驶模拟器研究首次提供了实验证据,解释了风险感知和横向控制在跟车距离减少中的作用。这些结果对于设计有效的驾驶员辅助和支持系统很有价值。

相似文献

1
Why do drivers maintain short headways in fog? A driving-simulator study evaluating feeling of risk and lateral control during automated and manual car following.为什么驾驶员在雾天保持较小的车头间距?一项驾驶模拟器研究评估了在自动驾驶和手动跟车过程中风险感知和横向控制。
Ergonomics. 2012;55(9):971-85. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2012.691993. Epub 2012 Jul 17.
2
Speed choice and driving performance in simulated foggy conditions.模拟雾天条件下的速度选择与驾驶表现。
Accid Anal Prev. 2011 May;43(3):698-705. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.10.014. Epub 2010 Dec 15.
3
Car following decisions under three visibility conditions and two speeds tested with a driving simulator.在三种能见度条件和两种速度下,使用驾驶模拟器测试跟车决策。
Accid Anal Prev. 2007 Jan;39(1):106-16. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2006.06.009. Epub 2006 Sep 7.
4
The consequences of an increase in heavy goods vehicles for passenger car drivers' mental workload and behaviour: a simulator study.重型货车增加对乘用车驾驶员心理负荷和行为的影响:一项模拟器研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2008 Mar;40(2):818-28. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2007.09.029. Epub 2007 Oct 22.
5
Driving in fog: the effects of driving experience and visibility on speed compensation and hazard avoidance.雾天驾驶:驾驶经验和能见度对速度补偿和避险的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2012 Sep;48:472-9. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2012.03.003. Epub 2012 Mar 28.
6
On-road and simulated driving: concurrent and discriminant validation.道路和模拟驾驶:同时验证和判别验证。
J Safety Res. 2011 Aug;42(4):267-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2011.06.004. Epub 2011 Aug 11.
7
That's close enough--a threshold effect of time headway on the experience of risk, task difficulty, effort, and comfort.这已经足够接近了——时间间隔对风险、任务难度、努力和舒适度的体验存在阈值效应。
Accid Anal Prev. 2010 Nov;42(6):1926-33. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.05.014. Epub 2010 Jun 8.
8
Evaluating secondary input devices to support an automotive touchscreen HMI: A cross-cultural simulator study conducted in the UK and China.评估用于支持车载触摸屏人机界面的辅助输入设备:在英国和中国进行的跨文化模拟器研究。
Appl Ergon. 2019 Jul;78:184-196. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.03.005. Epub 2019 Mar 22.
9
The influence of cruise control and adaptive cruise control on driving behaviour--a driving simulator study.巡航控制和自适应巡航控制对驾驶行为的影响——驾驶模拟器研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2011 May;43(3):1134-9. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.12.023. Epub 2011 Jan 13.
10
Relationships between driving simulator performance and driving test results.驾驶模拟器性能与驾驶测试结果之间的关系。
Ergonomics. 2009 Feb;52(2):137-53. doi: 10.1080/00140130802277521.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Imitation Phenomenon on Two-lane Traffic Safety in Fog Weather.雾天环境下跟驰现象对双车道交通安全的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Oct 1;16(19):3709. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16193709.
2
Preliminary study on visual recognition under low visibility conditions caused by artificial dynamic smog.人工动态烟雾导致低能见度条件下视觉识别的初步研究
Int J Ophthalmol. 2018 Nov 18;11(11):1821-1828. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2018.11.14. eCollection 2018.
3
Glaucoma and Driving Risk under Simulated Fog Conditions.模拟雾天条件下青光眼与驾驶风险
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2016 Dec 14;5(6):15. doi: 10.1167/tvst.5.6.15. eCollection 2016 Dec.
4
Obstacle avoidance, visual detection performance, and eye-scanning behavior of glaucoma patients in a driving simulator: a preliminary study.青光眼患者在驾驶模拟器中的避障、视觉检测表现和眼动扫描行为:一项初步研究。
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 16;8(10):e77294. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077294. eCollection 2013.