Department of BioMechanical Engineering, Maritime and Materials Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.
Ergonomics. 2012;55(9):971-85. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2012.691993. Epub 2012 Jul 17.
Drivers in fog tend to maintain short headways, but the reasons behind this phenomenon are not well understood. This study evaluated the effect of headway on lateral control and feeling of risk in both foggy and clear conditions. Twenty-seven participants completed four sessions in a driving simulator: clear automated (CA), clear manual (CM), fog automated (FA) and fog manual (FM). In CM and FM, the drivers used the steering wheel, throttle and brake pedals. In CA and FA, a controller regulated the distance to the lead car, and the driver only had to steer. Drivers indicated how much risk they felt on a touchscreen. Consistent with our hypothesis, feeling of risk and steering activity were elevated when the lead car was not visible. These results might explain why drivers adopt short headways in fog. Practitioner Summary: Fog poses a serious road safety hazard. Our driving-simulator study provides the first experimental evidence to explain the role of risk-feeling and lateral control in headway reduction. These results are valuable for devising effective driver assistance and support systems.
在雾天行驶的司机往往会保持较短的跟车距离,但这种现象背后的原因尚不清楚。本研究评估了在雾天和晴天两种情况下,车间距对横向控制和风险感知的影响。27 名参与者在驾驶模拟器中完成了四个阶段的测试:晴天自动(CA)、晴天手动(CM)、雾天自动(FA)和雾天手动(FM)。在 CM 和 FM 中,驾驶员使用方向盘、油门和刹车踏板。在 CA 和 FA 中,控制器调节与前车的距离,驾驶员只需转向。驾驶员通过触摸屏表示他们感觉到的风险程度。与我们的假设一致,当看不到前车时,风险感知和转向活动会增加。这些结果可能解释了为什么司机在雾天采用较短的跟车距离。
雾对道路安全构成严重威胁。我们的驾驶模拟器研究首次提供了实验证据,解释了风险感知和横向控制在跟车距离减少中的作用。这些结果对于设计有效的驾驶员辅助和支持系统很有价值。