Rhodes Eric R, Villegas Leah Fohl, Shaw Nancy J, Miller Carrie, Villegas Eric N
National Exposure Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
J Vis Exp. 2012 Jul 9(65):4177. doi: 10.3791/4177.
Cryptosporidium and Giardia species are two of the most prevalent protozoa that cause waterborne diarrheal disease outbreaks worldwide. To better characterize the prevalence of these pathogens, EPA Method 1623 was developed and used to monitor levels of these organisms in US drinking water supplies (12). The method has three main parts; the first is the sample concentration in which at least 10 L of raw surface water is filtered. The organisms and trapped debris are then eluted from the filter and centrifuged to further concentrate the sample. The second part of the method uses an immunomagnetic separation procedure where the concentrated water sample is applied to immunomagnetic beads that specifically bind to the Cryptosporidium oocysts and Giardia cysts allowing for specific removal of the parasites from the concentrated debris. These (oo)cysts are then detached from the magnetic beads by an acid dissociation procedure. The final part of the method is the immunofluorescence staining and enumeration where (oo)cysts are applied to a slide, stained, and enumerated by microscopy. Method 1623 has four listed sample concentration systems to capture Cryptosporidium oocysts and Giardia cysts in water: Envirochek filters (Pall Corporation, Ann Arbor, MI), Envirochek HV filters (Pall Corporation), Filta-Max filters (IDEXX, Westbrook, MA), or Continuous Flow Centrifugation (Haemonetics, Braintree, MA). However, Cryptosporidium and Giardia (oo)cyst recoveries have varied greatly depending on the source water matrix and filters used(1,14). A new tangential flow hollow-fiber ultrafiltration (HFUF) system has recently been shown to be more efficient and more robust at recovering Cryptosporidium oocysts and Giardia cysts from various water matrices; moreover, it is less expensive than other capsule filter options and can concentrate multiple pathogens simultaneously(1-3,5-8,10,11). In addition, previous studies by Hill and colleagues demonstrated that the HFUF significantly improved Cryptosporidium oocysts recoveries when directly compared with the Envirochek HV filters(4). Additional modifications to the current methods have also been reported to improve method performance. Replacing the acid dissociation procedure with heat dissociation was shown to be more effective at separating Cryptosporidium from the magnetic beads in some matrices(9,13) . This protocol describes a modified Method 1623 that uses the new HFUF filtration system with the heat dissociation step. The use of HFUF with this modified Method is a less expensive alternative to current EPA Method 1623 filtration options and provides more flexibility by allowing the concentration of multiple organisms.
隐孢子虫和贾第虫是全球范围内导致水源性腹泻病暴发的两种最常见的原生动物。为了更好地描述这些病原体的流行情况,美国环境保护局(EPA)制定了方法1623,并用于监测美国饮用水供应中这些生物体的水平(12)。该方法有三个主要部分;第一部分是样品浓缩,即至少过滤10升原地表水。然后将生物体和截留的碎片从过滤器中洗脱出来并离心,以进一步浓缩样品。该方法的第二部分采用免疫磁分离程序,将浓缩后的水样应用于免疫磁珠,这些磁珠能特异性结合隐孢子虫卵囊和贾第虫包囊,从而从浓缩后的碎片中特异性去除寄生虫。然后通过酸解离程序将这些(卵)囊从磁珠上分离下来。该方法的最后一部分是免疫荧光染色和计数,即将(卵)囊应用于载玻片上,进行染色并通过显微镜计数。方法1623有四种列出的用于捕获水中隐孢子虫卵囊和贾第虫包囊的样品浓缩系统:Envriochek过滤器(颇尔公司,密歇根州安阿伯)、Envriochek HV过滤器(颇尔公司)、Filta - Max过滤器(IDEXX公司,马萨诸塞州韦斯特布鲁克)或连续流离心法(海莫奈蒂克斯公司,马萨诸塞州布伦特里)。然而,隐孢子虫和贾第虫(卵)囊的回收率因水源水基质和所使用的过滤器不同而有很大差异(1,14)。最近有研究表明,一种新型的切向流中空纤维超滤(HFUF)系统在从各种水基质中回收隐孢子虫卵囊和贾第虫包囊方面更高效、更稳定;此外,它比其他胶囊过滤器选项成本更低,并且可以同时浓缩多种病原体(1 - 3,5 - 8,10,11)。此外,希尔及其同事之前的研究表明,与Envriochek HV过滤器直接比较时,HFUF显著提高了隐孢子虫卵囊的回收率(4)。也有报道称对当前方法进行了其他改进以提高方法性能。在某些基质中,用热解离程序替代酸解离程序在从磁珠上分离隐孢子虫方面更有效(9,13)。本方案描述了一种改进的方法1623,该方法使用带有热解离步骤的新型HFUF过滤系统。将HFUF与这种改进方法一起使用是当前EPA方法1623过滤选项的一种成本更低的替代方法,并且通过允许浓缩多种生物体提供了更大的灵活性。