• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者对长期疾病护理中差错的感知:定性研究。

Patients' perceptions of error in long-term illness care: qualitative study.

机构信息

Department of Primary Care and Public Health Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.

出版信息

J Health Serv Res Policy. 2012 Jul;17(3):181-7. doi: 10.1258/JHSRP.2012.011122.

DOI:10.1258/JHSRP.2012.011122
PMID:22807556
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To explore patients' perceptions of events that may represent errors in long-term illness care and evaluate potential associations with dimensions of quality in health care.

METHODS

Qualitative study based on semi-structured interviews with 33 patients with long-term conditions.

RESULTS

Patients' accounts revealed experiences of errors arising from health care. Errors of access included difficulties of gate-keeping leading to problems in gaining access to primary care consultations, diagnostic tests and specialist care. Potential harms included delayed diagnosis or delayed delivery of specialist care. Errors of interpersonal care included patients' perceptions of not being taken seriously, including perceived failure by professionals to respond adequately to reports of adverse drug reactions or accounts of painful symptoms. Potential harms included continuing medication-related symptoms, negative emotional reactions and breakdown in communication between patients and professionals. Errors were noted at transitions between primary and secondary care including failures of information transfer and communication.

CONCLUSIONS

Problems of gaining access to care and problems at transitions between levels of care may sometimes constitute errors, but they may also give rise to circumstances in which errors occur. Interpersonal and communication problems may also be associated with errors. There appears to be a close relationship between broader concepts of quality of care and the concept of patient safety.

摘要

目的

探索患者对长期疾病护理中可能出现的错误事件的看法,并评估其与医疗保健质量维度的潜在关联。

方法

基于对 33 名长期患病患者的半结构化访谈的定性研究。

结果

患者的叙述揭示了医疗保健中出现错误的经历。获取方面的错误包括守门人制度导致患者在获得初级保健咨询、诊断测试和专科护理方面出现问题。潜在危害包括延迟诊断或延迟提供专科护理。人际护理方面的错误包括患者感到自己不被重视,包括专业人员对不良反应报告或痛苦症状的描述没有做出适当的反应。潜在危害包括持续的药物相关症状、负面情绪反应以及患者和专业人员之间的沟通破裂。在初级保健和二级保健之间的过渡中也出现了问题,包括信息传递和沟通的失败。

结论

获得医疗保健的机会和在医疗保健水平之间过渡的问题有时可能构成错误,但也可能导致错误发生的情况。人际和沟通问题也可能与错误有关。在更广泛的医疗保健质量概念和患者安全概念之间似乎存在密切的关系。

相似文献

1
Patients' perceptions of error in long-term illness care: qualitative study.患者对长期疾病护理中差错的感知:定性研究。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2012 Jul;17(3):181-7. doi: 10.1258/JHSRP.2012.011122.
2
Patients' perception of types of errors in palliative care - results from a qualitative interview study.姑息治疗中患者对错误类型的认知——一项定性访谈研究的结果
BMC Palliat Care. 2016 Aug 11;15(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12904-016-0141-4.
3
Medical care perceptions in elderly patients with musculoskeletal complaints.老年肌肉骨骼疾病患者的医疗护理认知
Isr Med Assoc J. 2001 Nov;3(11):822-7.
4
Rural patients' experiences of the open disclosure of adverse events.农村患者对不良事件公开披露的体验。
Aust J Rural Health. 2014 Aug;22(4):197-203. doi: 10.1111/ajr.12124.
5
Experience of continuity of care of patients with multiple long-term conditions in England.英格兰对患有多种长期疾病患者的连续性护理经验。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2009 Apr;14(2):82-7. doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2009.008111.
6
Approaches to reducing the most important patient errors in primary health-care: patient and professional perspectives.减少初级卫生保健中最重要的患者错误的方法:患者和专业人员的观点。
Health Soc Care Community. 2010 May;18(3):296-303. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2009.00904.x. Epub 2010 Feb 7.
7
A patient-initiated voluntary online survey of adverse medical events: the perspective of 696 injured patients and families.一项由患者发起的关于不良医疗事件的自愿在线调查:696名受伤患者及其家属的观点。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Oct;24(10):620-9. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-003980. Epub 2015 Jun 19.
8
Patients' perception of error during craniotomy for brain tumour and their attitudes towards pre-operative discussion of error: a qualitative study.脑肿瘤开颅手术患者对术中失误的认知及其对术前失误讨论的态度:一项定性研究
Br J Neurosurg. 2012 Jun;26(3):326-30. doi: 10.3109/02688697.2011.633642. Epub 2011 Nov 28.
9
Dimensions of quality in long-term care facilities in Taiwan.台湾长期照护机构的质量维度。
J Adv Nurs. 2005 Dec;52(6):609-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03632.x.
10
Patient reports of preventable problems and harms in primary health care.患者对初级卫生保健中可预防问题及伤害的报告。
Ann Fam Med. 2004 Jul-Aug;2(4):333-40. doi: 10.1370/afm.220.

引用本文的文献

1
Disclosure following a medical error: lessons learned from a national initiative of workshops with patients, healthcare teams, and executives.医疗差错后的披露:从一项面向患者、医疗团队和管理人员的全国性研讨会倡议中吸取的经验教训。
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2024 Mar 11;13(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s13584-024-00599-8.
2
Designing the learning of intraprofessional collaboration among medical residents.设计医学住院医师之间的专业协作学习。
Med Educ. 2022 Oct;56(10):1017-1031. doi: 10.1111/medu.14868. Epub 2022 Jul 24.
3
Competencies to promote collaboration between primary and secondary care doctors: an integrative review.
促进初级保健医生和二级保健医生合作的能力:综合评价。
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Sep 2;21(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01234-6.
4
Why Families Get Angry: Practical Strategies for Clinical Ethics Consultants to Rebuild Trust Between Angry Families and Clinicians in the Critical Care Environment.家庭为何愤怒:临床伦理顾问在重症监护环境中重建愤怒家庭与临床医生之间信任的实用策略。
HEC Forum. 2019 Sep;31(3):201-217. doi: 10.1007/s10730-019-09370-y.
5
Safety work and risk management as burdens of treatment in primary care: insights from a focused ethnographic study of patients with multimorbidity.基层医疗中作为治疗负担的安全工作与风险管理:对患有多种疾病患者的聚焦人种志研究见解
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Sep 8;19(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0844-0.
6
Patients' evaluations of patient safety in English general practices: a cross-sectional study.英国全科医疗中患者对患者安全的评估:一项横断面研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2017 Jul;67(660):e474-e482. doi: 10.3399/bjgp17X691085. Epub 2017 Jun 5.
7
Identifying patient-centred recommendations for improving patient safety in General Practices in England: a qualitative content analysis of free-text responses using the Patient Reported Experiences and Outcomes of Safety in Primary Care (PREOS-PC) questionnaire.识别以患者为中心的建议,以提高英格兰普通实践中的患者安全:使用患者报告的初级保健安全体验和结果(PREOS-PC)问卷对自由文本回复进行的定性内容分析。
Health Expect. 2017 Oct;20(5):961-972. doi: 10.1111/hex.12537. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
8
Living with a long-term condition: Understanding well-being for individuals with thrombophilia or asthma.与长期疾病共存:了解血栓形成倾向或哮喘患者的健康状况。
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2016 Aug 16;11:31530. doi: 10.3402/qhw.v11.31530. eCollection 2016.
9
Blame the Patient, Blame the Doctor or Blame the System? A Meta-Synthesis of Qualitative Studies of Patient Safety in Primary Care.归咎于患者、归咎于医生还是归咎于制度?基层医疗中患者安全定性研究的元综合分析
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 5;10(8):e0128329. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128329. eCollection 2015.
10
Trust, temporality and systems: how do patients understand patient safety in primary care? A qualitative study.信任、时间性与系统:患者如何理解基层医疗中的患者安全?一项定性研究。
Health Expect. 2016 Apr;19(2):253-63. doi: 10.1111/hex.12342. Epub 2015 Feb 3.