Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
PLoS Med. 2012;9(7):e1001250. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001250. Epub 2012 Jul 10.
The rigorous evaluation of the impact of combination HIV prevention packages at the population level will be critical for the future of HIV prevention. In this review, we discuss important considerations for the design and interpretation of cluster randomized controlled trials (C-RCTs) of combination prevention interventions. We focus on three large C-RCTs that will start soon and are designed to test the hypothesis that combination prevention packages, including expanded access to antiretroviral therapy, can substantially reduce HIV incidence. Using a general framework to integrate mathematical modelling analysis into the design, conduct, and analysis of C-RCTs will complement traditional statistical analyses and strengthen the evaluation of the interventions. Importantly, even with combination interventions, it may be challenging to substantially reduce HIV incidence over the 2- to 3-y duration of a C-RCT, unless interventions are scaled up rapidly and key populations are reached. Thus, we propose the innovative use of mathematical modelling to conduct interim analyses, when interim HIV incidence data are not available, to allow the ongoing trials to be modified or adapted to reduce the likelihood of inconclusive outcomes. The preplanned, interactive use of mathematical models during C-RCTs will also provide a valuable opportunity to validate and refine model projections.
在人群层面上严格评估艾滋病毒综合预防套餐的影响,对于艾滋病毒预防的未来至关重要。在这篇综述中,我们讨论了设计和解释组合预防干预措施的集群随机对照试验(C-RCT)的重要注意事项。我们重点讨论了即将开始的三项大型 C-RCT,这些试验旨在检验以下假设,即包括扩大获得抗逆转录病毒治疗在内的综合预防套餐能够大幅降低艾滋病毒感染率。使用通用框架将数学模型分析纳入 C-RCT 的设计、实施和分析中,将补充传统的统计分析,并加强对干预措施的评估。重要的是,即使采用综合干预措施,在 C-RCT 的 2 至 3 年期间内,也可能难以大幅降低艾滋病毒感染率,除非干预措施迅速扩大规模并覆盖关键人群。因此,我们建议创新性地使用数学模型进行中期分析,在没有中期艾滋病毒感染数据的情况下,可以对正在进行的试验进行修改或调整,以降低不确定结果的可能性。在 C-RCT 期间,预先规划和交互式使用数学模型也将提供一个宝贵的机会来验证和完善模型预测。