• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于在墨西哥重新引入狼群的潜在区域的标准的共识。

Consensus on criteria for potential areas for wolf reintroduction in Mexico.

机构信息

Programa Regional de Manejo de Vida Silvestre, Universidad Nacional, Apartado 1350, Heredia 3000, Costa Rica.

出版信息

Conserv Biol. 2012 Aug;26(4):630-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2012.01888.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2012.01888.x
PMID:22809352
Abstract

Given the conflict with human interests that in many cases results in the extirpation of large carnivores, acceptance of their reintroduction is a considerable challenge. By the 1980s Mexican wolves (Canis lupus) were extinct in the wild. In 1998 a population was reintroduced in the Blue Range Mountains of New Mexico (U.S.A.). Efforts to reintroduce the species in Mexico have been ongoing since the late 1980s. Four teams working independently identified 6 areas in northern Mexico in the historic range of Mexican wolves, where reintroductions could potentially be successful. Each team used different methods and criteria to identify the areas, which makes it difficult to prioritize among these areas. Therefore, members of the different teams worked together to devise criteria for use in identifying priority areas. They identified areas with high, intermediate, and low potential levels of conflict between wolves and humans. Areas with low potential conflict had larger buffers (i.e., distance from human settlement to areas suitable for wolves) around human settlements than high- and intermediate-conflict areas and thus were thought most appropriate for the first reintroduction. High-conflict areas contained habitat associated with wolf presence, but were closer to human activity. The first reintroduction of Mexican wolves to Mexico occurred in October 2011 in one of the identified low-conflict areas. The identification of suitable areas for reintroduction represents a crucial step in the process toward the restoration of large carnivores. Choice of the first reintroduction area can determine whether the reintroduction is successful or fails. A failure may preclude future reintroduction efforts in a region or country.

摘要

鉴于在许多情况下,大型食肉动物的灭绝与人类利益相冲突,因此接受它们的重新引入是一个相当大的挑战。到 20 世纪 80 年代,墨西哥狼(Canis lupus)在野外已经灭绝。1998 年,在美国新墨西哥州的蓝岭山脉重新引入了一个种群。自 20 世纪 80 年代末以来,墨西哥一直在努力重新引入该物种。四个独立的团队在墨西哥北部历史上墨西哥狼的范围内确定了 6 个地区,在这些地区重新引入可能会成功。每个团队都使用不同的方法和标准来确定这些区域,这使得很难在这些区域之间进行优先级排序。因此,不同团队的成员共同努力制定了用于确定优先区域的标准。他们确定了人与狼之间冲突程度较高、中等和较低的区域。潜在冲突程度较低的区域在人类住区周围有较大的缓冲区(即,从人类住区到适合狼的区域的距离),而高冲突和中等冲突区域则没有,因此被认为最适合首次引入。高冲突区域包含与狼存在相关的栖息地,但离人类活动更近。2011 年 10 月,墨西哥首次在一个低冲突区域进行了墨西哥狼的重新引入。为重新引入选择合适的区域是恢复大型食肉动物过程中的关键步骤。首次引入区域的选择可以决定重新引入是成功还是失败。如果失败,可能会排除该地区或国家未来的重新引入工作。

相似文献

1
Consensus on criteria for potential areas for wolf reintroduction in Mexico.关于在墨西哥重新引入狼群的潜在区域的标准的共识。
Conserv Biol. 2012 Aug;26(4):630-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2012.01888.x.
2
Captive breeding and the reintroduction of Mexican and red wolves.圈养繁殖与墨西哥狼和红狼的重新引入。
Mol Ecol. 2008 Jan;17(1):344-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03400.x.
3
Developing metapopulation connectivity criteria from genetic and habitat data to recover the endangered Mexican wolf.从遗传和栖息地数据中制定复合种群连通性标准,以恢复濒危的墨西哥狼。
Conserv Biol. 2014 Feb;28(1):76-86. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12156. Epub 2013 Sep 20.
4
Systematic conservation planning and the cost of tackling conservation conflicts with large carnivores in Italy.意大利的系统保护规划以及应对与大型食肉动物的保护冲突的成本。
Conserv Biol. 2007 Dec;21(6):1455-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00834.x.
5
Trophic cascades from wolves to grizzly bears in Yellowstone.黄石公园内狼对灰熊的营养级联效应。
J Anim Ecol. 2014 Jan;83(1):223-33. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12123. Epub 2013 Sep 4.
6
Legacy lost: genetic variability and population size of extirpated US grey wolves (Canis lupus).遗产丧失:美国已灭绝灰狼(Canis lupus)的遗传变异性和种群规模
Mol Ecol. 2005 Jan;14(1):9-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02389.x.
7
Carnivore repatriation and holarctic prey: narrowing the deficit in ecological effectiveness.食肉动物回归与全北区猎物:缩小生态效能差距
Conserv Biol. 2007 Aug;21(4):1105-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00729.x.
8
Does interference competition with wolves limit the distribution and abundance of coyotes?与狼的干扰竞争是否限制了郊狼的分布和数量?
J Anim Ecol. 2007 Nov;76(6):1075-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2007.01287.x.
9
Elk migration patterns and human activity influence wolf habitat use in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem.麋鹿的迁徙模式和人类活动影响大黄石生态系统中狼的栖息地利用。
Ecol Appl. 2012 Dec;22(8):2293-307. doi: 10.1890/11-1829.1.
10
Wolf reintroduction to Scotland: public attitudes and consequences for red deer management.狼重新引入苏格兰:公众态度及对马鹿管理的影响
Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Apr 7;274(1612):995-1002. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2006.0369.

引用本文的文献

1
The Importance of Human Emotions for Wildlife Conservation.人类情感对野生动物保护的重要性。
Front Psychol. 2020 Jun 24;11:1277. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01277. eCollection 2020.
2
Biological and Sociopolitical Sources of Uncertainty in Population Viability Analysis for Endangered Species Recovery Planning.生物和社会政治因素对濒危物种恢复规划中种群生存力分析的不确定性影响。
Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 12;9(1):10130. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-45032-2.
3
Potential Distribution of Mountain Cloud Forest in Michoacán, Mexico: Prioritization for Conservation in the Context of Landscape Connectivity.
墨西哥米却肯州山地云雾森林的潜在分布:景观连通性背景下的保护优先次序
Environ Manage. 2017 Jul;60(1):86-103. doi: 10.1007/s00267-017-0871-y. Epub 2017 Apr 18.
4
CLINICAL CHALLENGE.临床挑战。
J Zoo Wildl Med. 2016 Sep;47(3):948-951. doi: 10.1638/2015-0178.1.