Budach Svenja C, Mueller Ralf S
Small Animal Medicine Clinic, Centre for Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Ludwig Maximilian University, Veterinaerstraße 13, 80539 Munich, Germany.
Vet Dermatol. 2012 Oct;23(5):426-e80. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3164.2012.01075.x. Epub 2012 Jul 19.
Cutaneous cytology is used in veterinary dermatology to assess bacteria and yeast on the skin surface and in the ears for diagnostic purposes and to monitor treatment success. A number of methods were used in reported studies to quantify micro-organisms on cytology, but evaluation of the intra- and interobserver reliability of the methods is rare.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the intra- and interobserver reliability of a semiquantitative cytology assessment method frequently used in practice.
A total of 60 experienced and inexperienced veterinarians and veterinary students were asked to evaluate 10 glass slides and 18 photographs of cutaneous cytology twice. Cocci, rods, yeast, neutrophilic and eosinophilic granulocytes and macrophages were graded from 0 to 4+.
The intra-observer reproducibility for evaluating the slides in the experienced group was 84.3%; in the inexperienced group it was 82.6%. For the photographs, the intra-observer reproducibility was 92.1% in both groups. The interobserver reproducibility for evaluating the slides was 81.6 and 81.0% in the experienced and inexperienced group, respectively; corresponding values for the photographs were 91.0 and 90.0%. There was no significant difference between different participants or between the first and second evaluation by each participant for any of the parameters graded.
Based on these results, this semiquantitative method of grading can be recommended for evaluating and monitoring of antimicrobial therapy in daily practice.
皮肤细胞学检查在兽医皮肤病学中用于评估皮肤表面和耳部的细菌及酵母菌,以辅助诊断并监测治疗效果。在已发表的研究中,有多种方法用于对细胞学检查中的微生物进行定量,但对这些方法的观察者内及观察者间可靠性评估却较为少见。
本研究旨在评估一种实践中常用的半定量细胞学评估方法的观察者内及观察者间可靠性。
共邀请60名经验丰富和经验不足的兽医及兽医专业学生对10张皮肤细胞学玻片和18张照片进行两次评估。对球菌、杆菌、酵母菌、嗜中性粒细胞、嗜酸性粒细胞及巨噬细胞进行0至4+分级。
经验丰富组对玻片评估的观察者内重复性为84.3%;经验不足组为82.6%。对于照片,两组的观察者内重复性均为92.1%。经验丰富组和经验不足组对玻片评估的观察者间重复性分别为81.6%和81.0%;照片的相应值分别为91.0%和90.0%。对于所分级的任何参数,不同参与者之间或每位参与者的首次与第二次评估之间均无显著差异。
基于这些结果,这种半定量分级方法可推荐用于日常实践中抗菌治疗的评估和监测。