• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测转子间髋部骨折中螺钉切出的可靠性。

Reliability of predictors for screw cutout in intertrochanteric hip fractures.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Jul 18;94(14):1266-72. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00357.

DOI:10.2106/JBJS.K.00357
PMID:22810396
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Following internal fixation of intertrochanteric hip fractures, tip apex distance, fracture classification, position of the screw in the femoral head, and fracture reduction are known predictors for screw cutout, but the reliability of these measurements is unknown. We investigated the reliability of the tip apex distance measurement, the Cleveland femoral head dividing system, the three-grade classification system of Baumgaertner for fracture reduction, and the AO classification system as predictors for screw cutout.

METHODS

All patients with an intertrochanteric hip fracture who were managed with either a dynamic hip screw or a gamma nail between January 2007 and June 2010 were evaluated from our hip trauma database.

RESULTS

The tip apex distance measurement was reliable and patients with device cutout had a significantly higher tip apex distance. The agreement between observers with regard to screw position and fracture reduction was moderately reliable. After adjustment for tip apex distance and screw position, A3 fractures were at more risk of cutout compared with A1 fractures. Poor fracture reduction was significantly related with a higher incidence of cutout in univariate analysis, but not in multivariate analysis. Central-inferior and anterior-inferior positions, after adjustment for tip apex distance and screw position, were significantly protective against cutout.

CONCLUSION

To decrease probable risks of cutout, the tip apex distance needs to stay small or the screw needs to be placed central-inferiorly or anterior-inferiorly.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

摘要

背景

股骨转子间骨折内固定术后,尖顶距、骨折分型、股骨头内螺钉位置以及骨折复位是螺钉切出的已知预测因素,但这些测量方法的可靠性尚不清楚。我们研究了尖顶距测量、克利夫兰股骨头分型系统、Baumgaertner 骨折复位三分法以及 AO 骨折分型系统作为螺钉切出预测因素的可靠性。

方法

我们从髋部创伤数据库中评估了 2007 年 1 月至 2010 年 6 月期间采用动力髋螺钉或伽玛钉治疗的所有股骨转子间骨折患者。

结果

尖顶距测量可靠,器械切出的患者尖顶距明显更高。观察者之间在螺钉位置和骨折复位方面的一致性为中度可靠。在调整尖顶距和螺钉位置后,A3 型骨折比 A1 型骨折更有可能发生切出。在单因素分析中,骨折复位不良与切出发生率升高显著相关,但在多因素分析中不相关。在调整尖顶距和螺钉位置后,中心-下和前-下位置显著降低了切出的风险。

结论

为了降低切出的可能风险,尖顶距需要保持较小,或者螺钉需要放置在中心-下或前-下位置。

证据水平

治疗性 III 级。请参阅作者说明,以获取完整的证据水平描述。

相似文献

1
Reliability of predictors for screw cutout in intertrochanteric hip fractures.预测转子间髋部骨折中螺钉切出的可靠性。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Jul 18;94(14):1266-72. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00357.
2
A mathematical simulation of the tip-apex distance and the calcar-referenced tip-apex distance for intertrochanteric fractures reduced with lag screws.使用拉力螺钉复位的转子间骨折的尖顶距离和参照股骨距的尖顶距离的数学模拟。
Injury. 2016 Jun;47(6):1302-8. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.03.029. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
3
Anterior Malreduction is Associated With Lag Screw Cutout After Internal Fixation of Intertrochanteric Fractures.骨折内固定术后前侧复位不良与拉力螺钉切出相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Mar 1;482(3):536-545. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002834. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
4
Is tip apex distance as important as we think? A biomechanical study examining optimal lag screw placement.尖顶距是否如我们所想的那般重要?一项关于最佳拉力螺钉置入位置的生物力学研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Aug;472(8):2492-8. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3594-x. Epub 2014 Apr 24.
5
Risk factors in cutout of sliding hip screw in intertrochanteric fractures: an evaluation of 937 patients.滑转子髋螺钉切出的危险因素:937 例患者评估。
Int Orthop. 2010 Dec;34(8):1273-6. doi: 10.1007/s00264-009-0866-2. Epub 2009 Sep 26.
6
Importance of screw position in intertrochanteric femoral fractures treated by dynamic hip screw.动力髋螺钉治疗股骨转子间骨折时螺钉位置的重要性。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2010 Feb;96(1):21-7. doi: 10.1016/j.rcot.2009.11.004.
7
Tip apex distance, hip screw placement, and neck shaft angle as potential risk factors for cut-out failure of hip screws after surgical treatment of intertrochanteric fractures.尖端顶点距离、髋螺钉位置和颈干角是手术治疗股骨转子间骨折后髋螺钉切出失败的潜在危险因素。
Int Orthop. 2012 Nov;36(11):2347-54. doi: 10.1007/s00264-012-1636-0. Epub 2012 Aug 12.
8
Surgical treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures with associated femoral neck fractures using a sliding hip screw.使用滑动髋螺钉治疗合并股骨颈骨折的股骨转子间髋部骨折
J Orthop Trauma. 2005 Jan;19(1):1-4. doi: 10.1097/00005131-200501000-00001.
9
Mechanical failure of Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) fixation in intertrochanteric fracture of the femur.股骨转子间骨折中动力髋螺钉(DHS)固定的机械故障。
Med J Malaysia. 2001 Dec;56 Suppl D:12-7.
10
Radiographic and functional results of osteosynthesis using the proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) in the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures.使用股骨近端抗旋髓内钉(PFNA)治疗不稳定型股骨转子间骨折的影像学及功能结果。
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2010;44(2):127-34. doi: 10.3944/AOTT.2010.2237.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Functional Outcomes Between Short and Long Cephalomedullary Nails in Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures in Elderly Patients.老年患者股骨转子间骨折中短型与长型股骨近端髓内钉功能预后的比较
Cureus. 2025 Aug 11;17(8):e89818. doi: 10.7759/cureus.89818. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Evaluation of reduction quality and implant positioning in intertrochanteric fracture fixation: A review of key radiographic parameters.股骨粗隆间骨折内固定中复位质量及植入物位置的评估:关键影像学参数综述
World J Orthop. 2025 Aug 18;16(8):106982. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v16.i8.106982.
3
Risk factors for implant failure of PFNA-II in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures (AO/OTA 31 A1 and A2).
PFNA-II治疗股骨转子间骨折(AO/OTA 31 A1和A2型)时植入失败的危险因素。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Aug 13;26(1):784. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-09035-7.
4
Are Tip-Apex Distance and Surgical Delay Associated with Increased Risk of Complications and Mortality Within the First Two Years After Surgery for Femoral Neck Fractures?股骨头颈骨折术后两年内,尖顶距离和手术延迟是否与并发症及死亡率增加相关?
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 15;14(14):4991. doi: 10.3390/jcm14144991.
5
Lower cortical thickness index does not correlate with increased surgical complications in proximal femoral fractures: a clinical and radiological study.较低的皮质厚度指数与股骨近端骨折手术并发症增加无关:一项临床和放射学研究。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 6;15(1):24115. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-09362-8.
6
The impact on lateral wall fractures by a sliding hip screw device in trochanteric fractures : a biomechanical study.动力髋螺钉装置对转子间骨折外侧壁骨折的影响:一项生物力学研究。
Bone Jt Open. 2025 May 29;6(5):582-589. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.65.BJO-2024-0266.R1.
7
Predicting mechanical complications in proximal femoral nailing for elderly patients: a radiological scoring system based on a single-centre retrospective cohort with 586 cases.预测老年患者股骨近端髓内钉固定术后的机械并发症:基于一项包含586例病例的单中心回顾性队列研究的放射学评分系统
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2025 Apr 12;51(1):172. doi: 10.1007/s00068-025-02850-6.
8
Computational evaluation of the biomechanical effects of position changes in the femoral neck system on Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures: an in silico study.股骨颈系统位置变化对 Pauwels III 型股骨颈骨折生物力学影响的计算评估:一项计算机模拟研究。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025 Feb 24;13:1493555. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1493555. eCollection 2025.
9
Biomechanical evaluation of the modified proximal femoral nail for the treatment of reverse obliquity intertrochanteric fractures.改良型股骨近端髓内钉治疗反斜型股骨转子间骨折的生物力学评估
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 25;15(1):3261. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-87951-3.
10
Predictive Factors for Cut-Out Risks of Unstable Trochanteric Fractures.不稳定型股骨转子间骨折切出风险的预测因素
Cureus. 2024 Nov 24;16(11):e74355. doi: 10.7759/cureus.74355. eCollection 2024 Nov.