Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology Center, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2012 Sep;23(9):996-1000. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2012.02331.x. Epub 2012 Jul 19.
Randomized Trial of ICE During CTI Ablation.
Despite a high success rate, radio-frequency ablation (RFA) of the cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) can be unusually challenging in some cases. We postulated that visualization of the CTI with intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) could maximize the success rate, decrease the procedure and ablation time, and minimize the radiation exposure.
In our prospective, randomized study, we included 102 patients scheduled for CTI ablation. We randomized patients in 2 groups: guided only by fluoroscopy (n = 52) or ICE-guided (n =50) group. Procedure time, fluoroscopy time, and the time spent for RFA were significantly shorter, radiation exposure (dose-area product-DAP) and the sum of delivered radio frequency energy were significantly lower in the ICE-group (68.06 ± 15.09 minutes vs 105.94 ± 36.51 minutes, P < 0.001, 5.54 ± 3.77 minutes vs 18.63 ± 10.60 minutes, P <0.001, 482.80 ± 534.12 seconds vs 779.76 ± 620.82 seconds, P = 0.001 and 397.62 ± 380.81 cGycm(2) vs 1,312.92 ± 1,129.28 cGycm(2) , P < 0.001, 10,866.84 ± 6,930.84 Ws vs 16,393.56 ± 13,995.78 Ws, P = 0.048, respectively). Seven patients (13%) from the fluoroscopy-only group crossed over to ICE-guidance because of prolonged unsuccessful RFA and were all treated successfully. Four vascular complications and 2 recurrences were equally distributed between the 2 groups.
ICE-guided ablation of the CTI significantly shortens the procedure and fluoroscopy time, markedly decreases radiation exposure, and time spent for ablation in comparison with fluoroscopy-only procedures. At the same time, visualization with ICE allowed successful ablation in challenging cases. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 23, pp. 996-1000, September 2012).
ICE 在 CTI 消融中的随机试验。
尽管射频消融(RFA)成功率很高,但在某些情况下,心尖峡部(CTI)的消融可能会异常具有挑战性。我们推测,使用心腔内超声心动图(ICE)观察 CTI 可以最大限度地提高成功率,缩短手术和消融时间,并最大限度地减少辐射暴露。
在我们前瞻性、随机研究中,我们纳入了 102 名计划进行 CTI 消融的患者。我们将患者随机分为两组:仅透视引导组(n = 52)或 ICE 引导组(n = 50)。ICE 组的手术时间、透视时间和 RFA 时间明显缩短,辐射暴露(剂量面积乘积-DAP)和传递的射频能量总和明显降低(68.06 ± 15.09 分钟 vs 105.94 ± 36.51 分钟,P < 0.001,5.54 ± 3.77 分钟 vs 18.63 ± 10.60 分钟,P < 0.001,482.80 ± 534.12 秒 vs 779.76 ± 620.82 秒,P = 0.001 和 397.62 ± 380.81 cGycm² vs 1312.92 ± 1129.28 cGycm²,P < 0.001,10866.84 ± 6930.84 Ws vs 16393.56 ± 13995.78 Ws,P = 0.048)。由于 RFA 不成功且时间延长,透视组中有 7 名患者(13%)交叉至 ICE 引导,并均成功治疗。两组血管并发症和复发各有 4 例和 2 例。
与仅透视组相比,ICE 引导 CTI 消融可显著缩短手术和透视时间,明显降低辐射暴露和消融时间。同时,ICE 的可视化允许在具有挑战性的情况下进行成功的消融。(J 心血管电生理学,第 23 卷,第 996-1000 页,2012 年 9 月)。